%0 Journal Article %J Journal of neurophysiology %D 1997 %T Dorsal column but not lateral column transection prevents down-conditioning of H reflex in rats. %A Xiang Yang Chen %A Jonathan Wolpaw %K Spinal Cord %X Operant conditioning of the H reflex, the electrical analogue of the spinal stretch reflex, in freely moving rats is a relatively simple model for studying long-term supraspinal control over spinal cord function. Motivated by food reward, rats can gradually increase or decrease the soleus H reflex. This study is the first effort to determine which spinal cord pathways convey the descending influence from supraspinal structures that changes the H reflex. In anesthetized Sprague-Dawley rats, the entire dorsal column (DC), which includes the main corticospinal tract, or the right lateral column (LC) was transected by electrocautery. Animals recovered quickly and the minimal transient effects of transection on the right soleus H reflex disappeared within 16 days. Beginning at least 18 days after transection, 12 rats were exposed to the HRdown-conditioning mode, in which reward was given when the H reflex of the right soleus muscle was below a criterion value. In seven LC rats exposed to the HRdown mode, the H reflex fell to 71 +/- 8% (mean +/- SE) of its initial value. In six of the seven, conditioning was successful (i.e., decrease to < or = 80%). These results were comparable with those previously obtained from normal rats. In contrast, in five DC rats exposed to the HRdown mode, the H reflex at the end of exposure was 106 +/- 12% of its initial value. In none of these rats was HRdown-conditioning successful. DC rats differed significantly from normal and LC rats in both final H reflex values and number successful. In five DC and three LC rats that continued under control conditions over 30-78 days, the H reflex at the end of the period was 98 +/- 4% and 100 +/- 8%, respectively, of its initial value, indicating that DC or LC transection itself did not lead to gradual increase or decrease in the H reflex. The results indicate that the DC, containing the main corticospinal tract, is essential for HRdown-conditioning, whereas the ipsilateral LC, containing the main rubrospinal, vestibulospinal, and reticulospinal tracts, is not essential. Combined with the known muscular specificity of conditioning, these results suggest that the main corticospinal tract is essential for HRdown-conditioning. The DC ascending tract might also be necessary. The respective roles of the DC descending and ascending tracts, and transection effects on HRup-conditioning and on the maintenance of both HRup- and HRdown-conditioning after they have occurred, remain to be defined. %B Journal of neurophysiology %V 78 %P 1730–1734 %8 09/1997 %G eng %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9310458