TY - JOUR T1 - An MEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI). JF - Neuroimage Y1 - 2007 A1 - Mellinger, Jürgen A1 - Gerwin Schalk A1 - Christoph Braun A1 - Preissl, Hubert A1 - Rosenstiel, W. A1 - Niels Birbaumer A1 - Kübler, A. KW - Adult KW - Algorithms KW - Artifacts KW - Brain KW - Electroencephalography KW - Electromagnetic Fields KW - Electromyography KW - Feedback KW - Female KW - Foot KW - Hand KW - Head Movements KW - Humans KW - Magnetic Resonance Imaging KW - Magnetoencephalography KW - Male KW - Movement KW - Principal Component Analysis KW - Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted KW - User-Computer Interface AB -

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) allow for communicating intentions by mere brain activity, not involving muscles. Thus, BCIs may offer patients who have lost all voluntary muscle control the only possible way to communicate. Many recent studies have demonstrated that BCIs based on electroencephalography(EEG) can allow healthy and severely paralyzed individuals to communicate. While this approach is safe and inexpensive, communication is slow. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) provides signals with higher spatiotemporal resolution than EEG and could thus be used to explore whether these improved signal properties translate into increased BCI communication speed. In this study, we investigated the utility of an MEG-based BCI that uses voluntary amplitude modulation of sensorimotor mu and beta rhythms. To increase the signal-to-noise ratio, we present a simple spatial filtering method that takes the geometric properties of signal propagation in MEG into account, and we present methods that can process artifacts specifically encountered in an MEG-based BCI. Exemplarily, six participants were successfully trained to communicate binary decisions by imagery of limb movements using a feedback paradigm. Participants achieved significant mu rhythm self control within 32 min of feedback training. For a subgroup of three participants, we localized the origin of the amplitude modulated signal to the motor cortex. Our results suggest that an MEG-based BCI is feasible and efficient in terms of user training.

VL - 36 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17475511 IS - 3 ER - TY - JOUR T1 - Space-time ICA versus Ensemble ICA for ictal EEG analysis with component differentiation via Lempel-Ziv complexity. JF - Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Y1 - 2007 A1 - Christopher J James A1 - Abásolo, Daniel A1 - Disha Gupta KW - Algorithms KW - Artificial Intelligence KW - Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted KW - Electroencephalography KW - Epilepsy KW - Humans KW - Pattern Recognition, Automated KW - Principal Component Analysis KW - Reproducibility of Results KW - Sensitivity and Specificity AB - In this proof-of-principle study we analyzed intracranial electroencephalogram recordings in patients with intractable focal epilepsy. We contrast two implementations of Independent Component Analysis (ICA) - Ensemble (or spatial) ICA (E-ICA) and Space-Time ICA (ST-ICA) in separating out the ictal components underlying the measurements. In each case we assess the outputs of the ICA algorithms by means of a non-linear method known as the Lempel-Ziv (LZ) complexity. LZ complexity quantifies the complexity of a time series and is well suited to the analysis of non-stationary biomedical signals of short length. Our results show that for small numbers of intracranial recordings, standard E-ICA results in marginal improvements in the separation as measured by the LZ complexity changes. ST-ICA using just 2 recording channels both near and far from the epileptic focus result in more distinct ictal components--although at this stage there is a subjective element to the separation process for ST-ICA. Our results are promising showing that it is possible to extract meaningful information from just 2 recording electrodes through ST-ICA, even if they are not directly over the seizure focus. This work is being further expanded for seizure onset analysis. VL - 08/2007 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18003250 ER -