00805nas a2200229   4500008004100000022001400041245013800055210006900193260001300262300000800275490000800283653002600291653001300317653001100330653002100341653001100362653001600373653002500389100002000414700002200434856011900456       2024                        eng d  a1872-895200aOperant up-conditioning of the soleus cutaneous reflex to non-noxious stimuli in a person with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury.0 aOperant upconditioning of the soleus cutaneous reflex to nonnoxi  c2024 Jan  a1-30 v15710aConditioning, Operant10aH-Reflex10aHumans10aMuscle, Skeletal10aReflex10aSpinal Cord10aSpinal Cord Injuries1 aPhipps, Alan, M1 aThompson, Aiko, K  uhttps://www.neurotechcenter.org/publications/2024/operant-conditioning-soleus-cutaneous-reflex-non-noxious-stimuli01203nas a2200277   4500008004100000022001400041245009000055210006900145260001200214300001000226490000700236520041500243653001200658653002600670653001300696653001100709653001700720653002100737653002400758653001100782653001600793653002500809100002200834700002100856856004800877       2014                        eng d  a1538-300800aThe simplest motor skill: mechanisms and applications of reflex operant conditioning.0 asimplest motor skill mechanisms and applications of reflex opera  c04/2014  a82-900 v423 aOperant conditioning protocols can change spinal reflexes gradually, which are the simplest behaviors. This article summarizes the evidence supporting two propositions: that these protocols provide excellent models for defining the substrates of learning and that they can induce and guide plasticity to help restore skills, such as locomotion, that have been impaired by spinal cord injury or other disorders.10aAnimals10aConditioning, Operant10aH-Reflex10aHumans10aMotor Skills10aMuscle, Skeletal10aNeuronal Plasticity10aReflex10aSpinal Cord10aSpinal Cord Injuries1 aThompson, Aiko, K1 aWolpaw, Jonathan  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2450873802599nas a2200289   4500008004100000022001400041245013200055210006900187260001200256300001800268490000700286520174900293653001702042653002102059653001502080653001102095653001702106653001602123100001302139700001302152700001302165700001702178700002402195700002102219700002102240856004802261       2010                        eng d  a1529-240100aH-reflex up-conditioning encourages recovery of EMG activity and H-reflexes after sciatic nerve transection and repair in rats.0 aHreflex upconditioning encourages recovery of EMG activity and H  c12/2010  a16128–161360 v303 aOperant conditioning of the spinal stretch reflex or its electrical analog, the H-reflex, produces spinal cord plasticity and can thereby affect motoneuron responses to primary afferent input. To explore whether this conditioning can affect the functional outcome after peripheral nerve injury, we assessed the effect of up-conditioning soleus (SOL) H-reflex on SOL and tibialis anterior (TA) function after sciatic nerve transection and repair. Sprague Dawley rats were implanted with EMG electrodes in SOL and TA and stimulating cuffs on the posterior tibial nerve. After control data collection, the sciatic nerve was transected and repaired and the rat was exposed for 120 d to continued control data collection (TC rats) or SOL H-reflex up-conditioning (TU rats). At the end of data collection, motoneurons that had reinnervated SOL and TA were labeled retrogradely. Putative primary afferent terminals [i.e., terminals containing vesicular glutamate transporter-1 (VGLUT1)] on SOL motoneurons were studied immunohistochemically. SOL (and probably TA) background EMG activity recovered faster in TU rats than in TC rats, and the final recovered SOL H-reflex was significantly larger in TU than in TC rats. TU and TC rats had significantly fewer labeled motoneurons and higher proportions of double-labeled motoneurons than untransected rats. VGLUT1 terminals were significantly more numerous on SOL motoneurons of TU than TC rats. Combined with the larger H-reflexes in TU rats, this anatomical finding supports the hypothesis that SOL H-reflex up-conditioning strengthened primary afferent reinnervation of SOL motoneurons. These results suggest that H-reflex up-conditioning may improve functional recovery after nerve injury and repair.10aconditioning10aperipheral nerve10aplasticity10aReflex10aregeneration10aSpinal Cord1 aChen, Yi1 aWang, Yu1 aChen, Lu1 aSun, Chenyou1 aEnglish, Arthur, W.1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aChen, Xiang Yang  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2112355902091nas a2200253   4500008004100000022001400041245004000055210003800095260001200133300001400145490000800159520142300167653002101590653002101611653002501632653001701657653001101674653001601685100002301701700002301724700002101747700002101768856004801789       2006                        eng d  a0014-481900aDiurnal H-reflex variation in mice.0 aDiurnal Hreflex variation in mice  c01/2006  a517–5280 v1683 aMice exhibit diurnal variation in complex motor behaviors, but little is known about diurnal variation in simple spinally mediated functions. This study describes diurnal variation in the H-reflex (HR), a wholly spinal and largely monosynaptic reflex. Six mice were implanted with tibial nerve cuff electrodes and electrodes in the soleus and gastrocnemius muscles, for recording of ongoing and nerve-evoked electromyographic activity (EMG). Stimulation and recording were under computer control 24 h/day. During a 10-day recording period, HR amplitude varied throughout the day, usually being larger in the dark than in the light. This diurnal HR variation could not be attributed solely to differences in the net ongoing level of descending and segmental excitation to the spinal cord or stimulus intensity. HRs were larger in the dark than in the light even after restricting the evoked responses to subsets of trials having similar ongoing EMG and M-responses. The diurnal variation in the HR was out of phase with that reported previously for rats, but was in phase with that observed in monkeys. These data, supported by those in other species, suggest that the supraspinal control of the excitability of the HR pathway varies throughout the day in a species-specific pattern. This variation should be taken into account in experimental and clinical studies of spinal reflexes recorded at different times of day.10acircadian rhythm10aElectromyography10aimplanted electrodes10aMonosynaptic10aReflex10aSpinal Cord1 aCarp, Jonathan, S.1 aTennissen, Ann, M.1 aChen, Xiang Yang1 aWolpaw, Jonathan  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1615178102210nas a2200205   4500008004100000022001400041245007200055210006900127260001200196300001600208490000700224520163400231653001101865653001201876100002101888700001301909700001301922700002101935856004801956       2006                        eng d  a0022-307700aOperant conditioning of reciprocal inhibition in rat soleus muscle.0 aOperant conditioning of reciprocal inhibition in rat soleus musc  c10/2006  a2144–21500 v963 aOperant conditioning of the H-reflex, the electrical analog of the spinal stretch reflex (SSR), induces activity-dependent plasticity in the spinal cord and might be used to improve locomotion after spinal cord injury. To further assess the potential clinical significance of spinal reflex conditioning, this study asks whether another well-defined spinal reflex pathway, the disynaptic pathway underlying reciprocal inhibition (RI), can also be operantly conditioned. Sprague-Dawley rats were implanted with electromyographic (EMG) electrodes in right soleus (SOL) and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles and a stimulating cuff on the common peroneal (CP) nerve. When background EMG in both muscles remained in defined ranges, CP stimulation elicited the TA H-reflex and SOL RI. After collection of control data for 20 days, each rat was exposed for 50 days to up-conditioning (RIup mode) or down-conditioning (RIdown mode) in which food reward occurred if SOL RI evoked by CP stimulation was more (RIup mode) or less (RIdown mode) than a criterion. TA and SOL background EMG and TA M response remained stable. In every rat, RI conditioning was successful (i.e., change > or =20% in the correct direction). In the RIup rats, final SOL RI averaged 171+/- 28% (mean +/- SE) of control, and final TA H-reflex averaged 114 +/- 14%. In the RIdown rats, final SOL RI averaged 37 +/- 13% of control, and final TA H-reflex averaged 60 +/- 18%. Final SOL RI and TA H-reflex sizes were significantly correlated. Thus like the SSR and the H-reflex, RI can be operantly conditioned; and conditioning one reflex can affect another reflex as well.10aReflex10aStretch1 aChen, Xiang Yang1 aChen, Lu1 aChen, Yi1 aWolpaw, Jonathan  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1680735102084nas a2200181   4500008004100000022001400041245007900055210006900134260001200203300001400215490000700229520154400236653001101780653002101791100002101812700002101833856004801854       2005                        eng d  a1072-050200aAblation of cerebellar nuclei prevents H-reflex down-conditioning in rats.0 aAblation of cerebellar nuclei prevents Hreflex downconditioning   c05/2005  a248–2540 v123 aWhile studies of cerebellar involvement in learning and memory have described plasticity within the cerebellum, its role in acquisition of plasticity elsewhere in the CNS is largely unexplored. This study set out to determine whether the cerebellum is needed for acquisition of the spinal cord plasticity that underlies operantly conditioned decrease in the H-reflex, the electrical analog of the spinal stretch reflex. Rats in which the cerebellar output nuclei dentate and interpositus (DIN) had been ablated were exposed for 50 d to the H-reflex down-conditioning protocol. DIN ablation, which in itself had no significant long-term effect on H-reflex size, entirely prevented acquisition of a smaller H-reflex. Since previous studies show that corticospinal tract (CST) transection also prevents down-conditioning while transection of the rubrospinal tract and other major descending tracts does not, this result implies that DIN output that affects cortex is essential for generation of the CST activity that induces the spinal cord plasticity, which is, in turn, directly responsible for the smaller H-reflex. The result extends the role of the cerebellum in learning and memory to include participation in induction of plasticity elsewhere in the CNS, specifically in the spinal cord. The cerebellum might simply support processes in sensorimotor cortex or elsewhere that change the spinal cord, or the cerebellum itself might undergo plasticity similar to that occurring with vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) or eyeblink conditioning.10aReflex10aVestibulo-Ocular1 aChen, Xiang Yang1 aWolpaw, Jonathan  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1593050301999nas a2200253   4500008004100000022001400041245005300055210005100108260001200159300001200171490000800183520136000191653001701551653001301568653001101581653001501592653000801607653001101615653001601626100002101642700001301663700002101676856004801697       2001                        eng d  a0304-394000aTime course of H-reflex conditioning in the rat.0 aTime course of Hreflex conditioning in the rat  c04/2001  a85–880 v3023 aThis study sought to define the course of operantly conditioned change in the rat soleus H-reflex and to determine whether, like H-reflex conditioning and spinal stretch reflex conditioning in the monkey, it develops in distinct phases. Data from 33 rats in which the right soleus H-reflex was trained up (i.e. HRup mode) and 38 in which it was trained down (i.e. HRdown mode) were averaged to define the courses of H-reflex increase and decrease. In HRup rats, the H-reflex showed a large phase I increase within the first 2 days followed by gradual phase II increase that continued for weeks. In HRdown rats, the H-reflex appeared to show a small phase I decrease and then showed a gradual phase II decrease over weeks. In combination with other recent work, the data suggest that H-reflex conditioning begins with a rapid mode-appropriate alteration in corticospinal tract influence over the spinal arc of the H-reflex, which causes phase I change, and that the continuation of this altered influence induces gradual spinal cord plasticity that is responsible for phase II change. The results further establish the similarity of H-reflex conditioning in primates and rats. Thus, they encourage efforts to produce a single coherent model of the phenomenon based on data from the two species and indicate the potential clinical relevance of the rat data.10aconditioning10aLearning10aMemory10aplasticity10arat10aReflex10aSpinal Cord1 aChen, Xiang Yang1 aChen, Lu1 aWolpaw, Jonathan  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1129039301892nas a2200229   4500008004100000022001400041245007400055210006900129260001200198300001400210490000800224520124700232653001801479653001101497653001401508100001801522700001501540700001701555700002101572700002101593856004801614       2000                        eng d  a0014-481900aWhat do reflex and voluntary mean? Modern views on an ancient debate.0 aWhat do reflex and voluntary mean Modern views on an ancient deb  c02/2000  a417–4320 v1303 aAre the words reflex and voluntary useful scientific concepts, or are they prescientific terms that should be discarded? Physiologists use these words routinely in their publications, in laboratory experiments and, indeed, like most lay people, in their daily lives. The tacit assumption is that we all know, more or less, what they mean. However, the issue has a rich history of philosophical and scientific debate; and, as this article demonstrates, present-day researchers still cannot reach a consensus on the meaning of the words and on whether it is possible to draw a scientific distinction between them. The five authors present five quite different analyses. In broad terms, they split into two camps: those who equate voluntary behaviours with consciousness and suppressibility and those who view all behaviours as sensorimotor interactions, the complexity of which determines whether they are reflexive or voluntary. According to the first view, most movements of daily life are neither purely reflex nor purely voluntary. They fall into the middle ground of automatic motor programs. According to the second view, as neuroscience advances the class of reflex behaviours will grow and the class of voluntary behaviours will shrink.10aConsciousness10aReflex10avoluntary1 aProchazka, A.1 aClarac, F.1 aLoeb, G., E.1 aRothwell, J., C.1 aWolpaw, Jonathan  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1071778501213nas a2200313   4500008004100000022001400041245005000055210004500105300001400150490000700164520043400171653001300605653001000618653001700628653002100645653001300666653001100679653001500690653001100705653001200716653001100728653001600739653001600755653002200771653001500793100002100808700002300829856004700852       1993                        eng d  a0065-140000aThe volitional nature of the simplest reflex.0 avolitional nature of the simplest reflex  a103–1110 v533 aRecent studies suggest that none of the behaviors of the vertebrate CNS are fixed responses incapable of change. Even the simplest reflex of all, the two-neuron, monosynaptic spinal stretch reflex (SSR), undergoes adaptive change under appropriate circumstances. Operantly conditioned SSR change occurs gradually over days and weeks and is associated with a complex pattern of CNS plasticity at both spinal and supraspinal sites.10abehavior10aBrain10aconditioning10ahuman physiology10aLearning10aMemory10amotoneuron10anature10aprimate10aReflex10aSpinal Cord10aspinal site10asupra spinal site10avertebrate1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aCarp, Jonathan, S.  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/831723802050nas a2200181   4500008004100000022001400041245012100055210006900176260001200245300001400257490000800271520148300279653001101762653001201773100001501785700002101800856004701821       1988                        eng d  a0014-488600aJendrassik maneuver facilitates soleus H-reflex without change in average soleus motoneuron pool membrane potential.0 aJendrassik maneuver facilitates soleus Hreflex without change in  c08/1988  a288–3020 v1013 aFacilitation of spinal reflex amplitude by remote muscle contraction, otherwise known as the Jendrassik maneuver (JM), was first shown over 100 years ago, yet the mechanism by which this facilitation operates remains undetermined. Earlier work has eliminated participation of the muscle spindle in JM-induced spinal reflex facilitation, leaving changes in postsynaptic (e.g., change in average soleus motoneuron membrane potential) and presynaptic (e.g., inhibition of presynaptic inhibition) mechanisms as viable candidates. We recorded background EMG in the soleus muscle during JM-induced soleus H-reflex facilitation in humans. The JM in this experiment consisted of wrist muscle contraction. Soleus background EMG was maintained by the subject at either a zero level (e.g., relaxed) or a specified moderate level prior to and during the JM. The JM increased H-reflex amplitude by comparable amounts in both situations, but had no effect on soleus background EMG. Given the well-known relationship between the average motoneuron pool membrane potential and background EMG, we conclude that JM facilitation of the soleus H-reflex is not caused by an increase in background excitatory input to the soleus motoneuron pool. Remaining candidates for mediation of JM induced H-reflex facilitation include change in stimulus-evoked afferent input at some point proximal to the muscle spindle, such as reduction in presynaptic inhibition, or a change in motoneuron input resistance.10aReflex10aStretch1 aDowman, R.1 aWolpaw, Jonathan  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/339664601683nas a2200169   4500008004100000022001400041245007100055210006900126260001200195300001600207490000700223520119200230653001101422653001201433100002101445856004701466       1982                        eng d  a0014-944600aChange in short-latency response to limb displacement in primates.0 aChange in shortlatency response to limb displacement in primates  c04/1982  a2156–21590 v413 aWhen a muscle is stretched in an awake, behaving primate the earliest electromyographic (EMG) responses of the muscle consists of several reflex components. The earliest, M1, is mediated entirely at the segmental level and is largely monosynaptic. The next M2, is at least in part the result of an oligosynaptic transcortical loop to control the M1 response remains to be established. If primates can learn to control M1 amplitude, the M1 loop, which is the simplest and most accessible stimulus-response pathway in the primate central nervous system, may serve as a model for the study of mechanisms of memory. Preliminary evidence presented here strongly suggests that primates can control M1 gain without change in prestimulus EMG activity. The mechanisms of such change remain to be determined. Possibilities include change in gamma motor neuron tone, in Ia synaptic function, and in alpha motor neuron recruitment. The usefulness of learned M1 change as a model for memory will depend to a large extent on the nature of the responsible mechanism and on demonstration that the change can eventually become resident at the segmental level, without need for continued descending input.10aReflex10aStretch1 aWolpaw, Jonathan  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/707578901279nas a2200169   4500008004100000022001400041245006200055210005700117260001200174300001400186490000800200520080000208653001101008100002301019700002101042856004601063       1979                        eng d  a0003-978000aThe effects of phenytoin on motor function in awake cats.0 aeffects of phenytoin on motor function in awake cats  c01/1979  a139–1480 v2373 aAdult cats were monitored for their performance of a variety of motor functions before and after acute administration of phenytoin (5, 10 or 20 mg/kg) in a schedule in which each animal received all drug doses. The only significant loss in motor function was balance and coordination. Half the animals could not balance or walk along a narrow-edged beam after 20 mg/kg of phenytoin although their performance was not impaired at lower drug doses or on wider surfaces. There were no effects of phenytoin on the righting reflex, flexor reflex, muscle strength, the hopping response, the blind placing response or visually aided placing. The data suggest that phenytoin has a selective effect on higher order neuronal systems involved with balance and locomotion rather than simple reflex pathways.10aReflex1 aCarp, Jonathan, S.1 aAnderson, R., J.  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/485678