02753nas a2200373 4500008004100000022001400041245011800055210006900173260001200242300001100254490000800265520163200273653001001905653001501915653001701930653002001947653001501967653002501982653001102007653001702018653001102035653000902046653001602055653001402071653002802085653001802113653001602131100003202147700002102179700001902200700001902219700001902238856012202257 2021 eng d a1095-957200aWithin-subject reaction time variability: Role of cortical networks and underlying neurophysiological mechanisms.0 aWithinsubject reaction time variability Role of cortical network c08/2021 a1181270 v2373 a

Variations in reaction time are a ubiquitous characteristic of human behavior. Extensively documented, they have been successfully modeled using parameters of the subject or the task, but the neural basis of behavioral reaction time that varies within the same subject and the same task has been minimally studied. In this paper, we investigate behavioral reaction time variance using 28 datasets of direct cortical recordings in humans who engaged in four different types of simple sensory-motor reaction time tasks. Using a previously described technique that can identify the onset of population-level cortical activity and a novel functional connectivity algorithm described herein, we show that the cumulative latency difference of population-level neural activity across the task-related cortical network can explain up to 41% of the trial-by-trial variance in reaction time. Furthermore, we show that reaction time variance may primarily be due to the latencies in specific brain regions and demonstrate that behavioral latency variance is accumulated across the whole task-related cortical network. Our results suggest that population-level neural activity monotonically increases prior to movement execution, and that trial-by-trial changes in that increase are, in part, accounted for by inhibitory activity indexed by low-frequency oscillations. This pre-movement neural activity explains 19% of the measured variance in neural latencies in our data. Thus, our study provides a mechanistic explanation for a sizable fraction of behavioral reaction time when the subject's task is the same from trial to trial.

10aAdult10aAlgorithms10aAlpha Rhythm10aCerebral Cortex10aConnectome10aElectrocorticography10aFemale10aGamma Rhythm10aHumans10aMale10aMiddle Aged10aNerve Net10aPsychomotor Performance10aReaction Time10aYoung Adult1 aParaskevopoulou, Sivylla, E1 aCoon, William, G1 aBrunner, Peter1 aMiller, Kai, J1 aSchalk, Gerwin uhttps://www.neurotechcenter.org/publications/2021/within-subject-reaction-time-variability-role-cortical-networks-and03803nas a2200433 4500008004100000022001400041024002500055245010000080210006900180260001200249300001100261490000600272520257600278653001002854653001002864653001802874653002502892653002702917653002202944653002802966653001102994653001103005653001603016653000903032653001603041653001403057653003403071653002803105100001903133700002203152700001803174700002103192700001803213700002903231700001803260700002403278700001903302856004803321 2011 eng d a1741-2552 aNIHMSID: NIHMS48176700aUsing the electrocorticographic speech network to control a brain-computer interface in humans.0 aUsing the electrocorticographic speech network to control a brai c06/2011 a0360040 v83 a

Electrocorticography (ECoG) has emerged as a new signal platform for brain-computer interface (BCI) systems. Classically, the cortical physiology that has been commonly investigated and utilized for device control in humans has been brain signals from the sensorimotor cortex. Hence, it was unknown whether other neurophysiological substrates, such as the speech network, could be used to further improve on or complement existing motor-based control paradigms. We demonstrate here for the first time that ECoG signals associated with different overt and imagined phoneme articulation can enable invasively monitored human patients to control a one-dimensional computer cursor rapidly and accurately. This phonetic content was distinguishable within higher gamma frequency oscillations and enabled users to achieve final target accuracies between 68% and 91% within 15 min. Additionally, one of the patients achieved robust control using recordings from a microarray consisting of 1 mm spaced microwires. These findings suggest that the cortical network associated with speech could provide an additional cognitive and physiologic substrate for BCI operation and that these signals can be acquired from a cortical array that is small and minimally invasive.

10aAdult10aBrain10aBrain Mapping10aComputer Peripherals10aElectroencephalography10aEvoked Potentials10aFeedback, Physiological10aFemale10aHumans10aImagination10aMale10aMiddle Aged10aNerve Net10aSpeech Production Measurement10aUser-Computer Interface1 aLeuthardt, E C1 aGaona, Charles, M1 aSharma, Mohit1 aSzrama, Nicholas1 aRoland, Jarod1 aFreudenberg, Zachary, V.1 aSolisb, Jamie1 aBreshears, Jonathan1 aSchalk, Gerwin uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21471638