02846nas a2200241   4500008004100000245008500041210006900126260001200195490000600207520209000213653000802303653002502311653001902336653001302355653003002368100002002398700001702418700001902435700002002454700002402474700001702498856008902515       2020                        eng d00aBCI-based sensorimotor rhythm training can affect individuated finger movements 0 aBCIbased sensorimotor rhythm training can affect individuated fi  c06/20200 v73 aBrain-computer interface (BCI) technology can restore communication and control to people who are severely paralyzed. BCI technology might also be able to enhance rehabilitation of motor function. We have previously shown that pre-movement sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) amplitude affects reaction time and performance on a joystick-based cursor movement task. The present study explores in adults without motor impairment the possibility that pre-movement SMR amplitude affects performance of individuated finger movements. In Phase 1, 8 individuals performed a finger flexion task that was monitored by an exoskeleton. During a 1-sec preparatory period, two colored targets on a video monitor cued flexion of the index finger, middle finger, both fingers, or neither finger; sudden color change then triggered the movement (or non-movement). SMR features (i.e. EEG amplitudes in specific frequency bands at specific scalp locations) in the pre-movement EEG that correlated with movement versus no movement were identified. In Phase 2, the participants learned to increase or decrease these SMR features to control a two-target BCI task. Finally, in Phase 3, they were asked to increase or decrease the SMR features to initiate the finger flexion task of Phase 1 and the impact on finger flexion performance was assessed. After BCI training, pre-movement SMR feature amplitude affected performance in a subset of individuals: lower amplitude was associated with shorter movement onset. In a subset of individuals, the beneficial effect on performance of lower SMR amplitude was greater when both fingers were flexed than when one was flexed and the other remained extended; thus, the impact of SMR amplitude modulation depended on the specificity of the subsequent motor task. These results indicate that BCI-based training of SMR activity in the pre-movement preparatory period can affect finger movements in a subset of individuals. They encourage studies that integrate such training into rehabilitation protocols and examine its capacity to enhance restoration of useful hand function.10aBCI10amovement preparation10aRehabilitation10aRobotics10asensorimotor beta rhythms1 aMcFarland, D.J.1 aNorman, S.L.1 aSarnacki, W.A.1 aWolbrecht, E.T.1 aReinkensmeyer, D.J.1 aWolpaw, J.R.  uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/2326263X.2020.1763060?journalCode=tbci2003989nas a2200193   4500008004100000245005800041210005600099260001200155490000800167520340900175653000803584653000803592653002903600653003003629100001703659700002703676700001703703856007503720       2020                        eng d00aBrain-computer interfaces: Definitions and principles0 aBraincomputer interfaces Definitions and principles  c03/20200 v1683 aThroughout life, the central nervous system (CNS) interacts with the world and with the body by activating muscles and excreting hormones. In contrast, brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) quantify CNS activity and translate it into new artificial outputs that replace, restore, enhance, supplement, or improve the natural CNS outputs. BCIs thereby modify the interactions between the CNS and the environment. Unlike the natural CNS outputs that come from spinal and brainstem motoneurons, BCI outputs come from brain signals that represent activity in other CNS areas, such as the sensorimotor cortex. If BCIs are to be useful for important communication and control tasks in real life, the CNS must control these brain signals nearly as reliably and accurately as it controls spinal motoneurons. To do this, they might, for example, need to incorporate software that mimics the function of the subcortical and spinal mechanisms that participate in normal movement control. The realization of high reliability and accuracy is perhaps the most difficult and critical challenge now facing BCI research and development.

The ongoing adaptive modifications that maintain effective natural CNS outputs take place primarily in the CNS. The adaptive modifications that maintain effective BCI outputs can also take place in the BCI. This means that the BCI operation depends on the effective collaboration of two adaptive controllers, the CNS and the BCI. Realization of this second adaptive controller, the BCI, and management of its interactions with concurrent adaptations in the CNS comprise another complex and critical challenge for BCI development.

BCIs can use different kinds of brain signals recorded in different ways from different brain areas. Decisions about which signals recorded in which ways from which brain areas should be selected for which applications are empirical questions that can only be properly answered by experiments.

BCIs, like other communication and control technologies, often face artifacts that contaminate or imitate their chosen signals. Noninvasive BCIs (e.g., EEG- or fNIRS-based) need to take special care to avoid interpreting nonbrain signals (e.g., cranial EMG) as brain signals. This typically requires comprehensive topographical and spectral evaluations.

In theory, the outputs of BCIs can select a goal or control a process. In the future, the most effective BCIs will probably be those that combine goal selection and process control so as to distribute control between the BCI and the application in a fashion suited to the current action. Through such distribution, BCIs may most effectively imitate natural CNS operation.

The primary measure of BCI development is the extent to which BCI systems benefit people with neuromuscular disorders. Thus, BCI clinical evaluation, validation, and dissemination is a key step. It is at the same time a complex and difficult process that depends on multidisciplinary collaboration and management of the demanding requirements of clinical studies.

Twenty-five years ago, BCI research was an esoteric endeavor pursued in only a few isolated laboratories. It is now a steadily growing field that engages many hundreds of scientists, engineers, and clinicians throughout the world in an increasingly interconnected community that is addressing the key issues and pursuing the high potential of BCI technology.10aBCI10aBMI10abrain-computer interface10abrain–machine interface1 aWolpaw, J.R.1 aMillán, José, del R.1 aRamsey, N.F.  uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B978044463934900002001263nas a2200253   4500008004100000245006000041210005900101260001200160490000800172520057900180653000800759653000800767653001300775653002500788653001900813100001400832700001500846700001500861700001500876700001700891700001200908700001700920856007200937       2020                        eng d00aOperant Condition of the Flexor Carpi Radialis H-reflex0 aOperant Condition of the Flexor Carpi Radialis Hreflex  c12/20200 v1013 aOperant conditioning of the largely monosynaptic H-reflex is a targeted and non-invasive therapeutic intervention for people with motor dysfunction after spinal cord injury and possibly stroke.1,2,3 It can complement other therapies and has no known adverse side effects. To date, H-reflex operant conditioning has focused on the leg. Here, we extend it to the arm by asking participants to either increase or decrease the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) H-reflex. In addition, we examine concurrent changes in brain activity by recording electroencephalographic activity (EEG).10aBCI10aFCR10aH-Reflex10aoperant conditioning10aRehabilitation1 aNorton, J1 aVaughan, T1 aGemoets, D1 aHeckman, S1 aToliou, S.D.1 aCarp, J1 aWolpaw, J.R.  uhttps://www.archives-pmr.org/article/S0003-9993(20)31081-9/abstract02706nas a2200265   4500008004100000245009100041210006900132260001200201490000700213520195600220653000802176653001802184653001902202653001002221653002402231653001102255100001502266700001802281700001302299700001502312700001802327700002102345700002202366856005202388       2018                        eng d00aControlling pre-movement sensorimotor rhythm can improve finger extension after stroke0 aControlling premovement sensorimotor rhythm can improve finger e  c08/20180 v153 aObjective. Brain–computer interface (BCI) technology is attracting increasing interest as a tool for enhancing recovery of motor function after stroke, yet the optimal way to apply this technology is unknown. Here, we studied the immediate and therapeutic effects of BCI-based training to control pre-movement sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) amplitude on robot-assisted finger extension in people with stroke. Approach. Eight people with moderate to severe hand impairment due to chronic stroke completed a four-week three-phase protocol during which they practiced finger extension with assistance from the FINGER robotic exoskeleton. In Phase 1, we identified spatiospectral SMR features for each person that correlated with the intent to extend the index and/or middle finger(s). In Phase 2, the participants learned to increase or decrease SMR features given visual feedback, without movement. In Phase 3, the participants were cued to increase or decrease their SMR features, and when successful, were then cued to immediately attempt to extend the finger(s) with robot assistance. Main results. Of the four participants that achieved SMR control in Phase 2, three initiated finger extensions with a reduced reaction time after decreasing (versus increasing) pre-movement SMR amplitude during Phase 3. Two also extended at least one of their fingers more forcefully after decreasing pre-movement SMR amplitude. Hand function, measured by the box and block test (BBT), improved by 7.3  ±  7.5 blocks versus 3.5  ±  3.1 blocks in those with and without SMR control, respectively. Higher BBT scores at baseline correlated with a larger change in BBT score. Significance. These results suggest that learning to control person-specific pre-movement SMR features associated with finger extension can improve finger extension ability after stroke for some individuals. These results merit further investigation in a rehabilitation context.10aBCI10aMotor control10aRehabilitation10arobot10asensorimotor rhythm10aStroke1 aNorman, SL1 aMcFarland, DJ1 aMiner, A1 aCramer, SC1 aWolbrecht, ET1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aReinkensmeyer, DJ  uhttp://stacks.iop.org/1741-2552/15/i=5/a=05602602955nas a2200289   4500008004100000245010000041210006900141260001200210490000700222520214900229653000802378653003102386653000902417653001002426653002302436653001402459653001102473100001602484700001302500700001402513700001302527700001302540700001802553700001302571700001402584856006702598       2018                        eng d00aReal-time detection and discrimination of visual perception using electrocorticographic signals0 aRealtime detection and discrimination of visual perception using  c02/20180 v153 aSeveral neuroimaging studies have demonstrated that the ventral temporal cortex contains specialized regions that process visual stimuli. This study investigated the spatial and temporal dynamics of electrocorticographic (ECoG) responses to different types and colors of visual stimulation that were presented to four human participants, and demonstrated a real-time decoder that detects and discriminates responses to untrained natural images. Approach. ECoG signals from the participants were recorded while they were shown colored and greyscale versions of seven types of visual stimuli (images of faces, objects, bodies, line drawings, digits, and kanji and hiragana characters), resulting in 14 classes for discrimination (experiment I). Additionally, a real-time system asynchronously classified ECoG responses to faces, kanji and black screens presented via a monitor (experiment II), or to natural scenes (i.e. the face of an experimenter, natural images of faces and kanji, and a mirror) (experiment III). Outcome measures in all experiments included the discrimination performance across types based on broadband γ activity. Main results. Experiment I demonstrated an offline classification accuracy of 72.9% when discriminating among the seven types (without color separation). Further discrimination of grey versus colored images reached an accuracy of 67.1%. Discriminating all colors and types (14 classes) yielded an accuracy of 52.1%. In experiment II and III, the real-time decoder correctly detected 73.7% responses to face, kanji and black computer stimuli and 74.8% responses to presented natural scenes. Significance. Seven different types and their color information (either grey or color) could be detected and discriminated using broadband γ activity. Discrimination performance maximized for combined spatial-temporal information. The discrimination of stimulus color information provided the first ECoG-based evidence for color-related population-level cortical broadband γ responses in humans. Stimulus categories can be detected by their ECoG responses in real time within 500 ms with respect to stimulus onset.10aBCI10aBrain–computer interface10aECoG10agamma10ahigh gamma mapping10areal-time10avisual1 aKapeller, C1 aOgawa, H1 aSchalk, G1 aKunii, N1 aCoon, WG1 aScharinger, J1 aGuger, C1 aKamada, K  uhttp://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1741-2552/aaa9f6/pdf01929nas a2200265   4500008004100000245010300041210006900144260000800213300001100221490000600232520106300238653000801301653003001309653000901339653002501348653002501373100002001398700001901418700001801437700002401455700002601479700001901505700001901524856012001543       2016                        eng d00aDifferential roles of high gamma and local motor potentials for movement preparation and execution0 aDifferential roles of high gamma and local motor potentials for   cMay  a88-1020 v33 aDetermining a person’s intent, such as the planned direction of their movement, directly from their cortical activity could support important applications such as brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). Continuing development of improved BCI systems requires a better understanding of how the brain prepares for and executes movements. To contribute to this understanding, we recorded surface cortical potentials (electrocorticographic signals; ECoG) in 11 human subjects performing a delayed center-out task to establish the differential role of high gamma activity (HGA) and the local motor potential (LMP) as a function of time and anatomical area during movement preparation and execution. High gamma modulations mostly confirm previous findings of sensorimotor cortex involvement, whereas modulations in LMPs are observed in prefrontal cortices. These modulations include directional information during movement planning as well as execution. Our results suggest that sampling signals from these widely distributed cortical areas improves decoding accuracy.10aBCI10abrain-computer interfaces10aECoG10aElectrocorticography10asensorimotor systems1 aGunduz, Aysegul1 aBrunner, Peter1 aSharma, Mohit1 aLeuthardt, Eric, C.1 aRitaccio, Anthony, L.1 aPesaran, Bijan1 aSchalk, Gerwin  uhttps://www.neurotechcenter.org/publications/2016/differential-roles-high-gamma-and-local-motor-potentials-movement02257nas a2200217   4500008004100000022001400041245016900055210006900224260001200293520155100305653000801856653001301864653000801877653000801885653000801893653002201901653002301923100002001946700002501966856004801991       2013                        eng d  a1559-008900aInteractions Between Pre-Processing and Classification Methods for Event-Related-Potential Classification : Best-Practice Guidelines for Brain-Computer Interfacing.0 aInteractions Between PreProcessing and Classification Methods fo  c04/20133 aDetecting event related potentials (ERPs) from single trials is critical to the operation of many stimulus-driven brain computer interface (BCI) systems. The low strength of the ERP signal compared to the noise (due to artifacts and BCI irrelevant brain processes) makes this a challenging signal detection problem. Previous work has tended to focus on how best to detect a single ERP type (such as the visual oddball response). However, the underlying ERP detection problem is essentially the same regardless of stimulus modality (e.g. visual or tactile), ERP component (e.g. P300 oddball response, or the error-potential), measurement system or electrode layout. To investigate whether a single ERP detection method might work for a wider range of ERP BCIs we compare detection performance over a large corpus of more than 50 ERP BCI datasets whilst systematically varying the electrode montage, spectral filter, spatial filter and classifier training methods. We identify an interesting interaction between spatial whitening and regularised classification which made detection performance independent of the choice of spectral filter low-pass frequency. Our results show that pipeline consisting of spectral filtering, spatial whitening, and regularised classification gives near maximal performance in all cases. Importantly, this pipeline is simple to implement and completely automatic with no expert feature selection or parameter tuning required. Thus, we recommend this combination as a "best-practice" method for ERP detection problems.10aBCI10adecoding10aEEG10aERP10aLDA10aspatial filtering10aspectral filtering1 aFarquhar, Jason1 aHill, Jeremy, Jeremy  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2325066801769nas a2200373   4500008004100000245003800041210003700079260001200116300000900128490000600137520083700143653000800980653002900988653001601017100001801033700001601051700001501067700002101082700002101103700002101124700001201145700001501157700001601172700002001188700001301208700002101221700001501242700001901257700001601276700001601292700001501308700002401323856004801347       2012                        eng d00aReview of the BCI Competition IV.0 aReview of the BCI Competition IV  c07/2012  a1-310 v63 aThe BCI competition IV stands in the tradition of prior BCI competitions that aim to provide high quality neuroscientific data for open access to the scientific community. As experienced already in prior competitions not only scientists from the narrow field of BCI compete, but scholars with a broad variety of backgrounds and nationalities. They include high specialists as well as students. The goals of all BCI competitions have always been to challenge with respect to novel paradigms and complex data. We report on the following challenges: (1) asynchronous data, (2) synthetic, (3) multi-class continuous data, (4) session-to-session transfer, (5) directionally modulated MEG, (6) finger movements recorded by ECoG. As after past competitions, our hope is that winning entries may enhance the analysis methods of future BCIs.10aBCI10abrain-computer interface10acompetition1 aTangermann, M1 aMuller, K R1 aAertsen, A1 aBirbaumer, Niels1 aBraun, Christoph1 aBrunner, Clemens1 aLeeb, R1 aMehring, C1 aMiller, K J1 aMueller-Putz, G1 aNolte, G1 aPfurtscheller, G1 aPreissl, H1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aSchlögl, A1 aVidaurre, C1 aWaldert, S1 aBlankertz, Benjamin  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2281165701207nas a2200181   4500008004100000020002200041245003200063210003000095260001900125520069300144653000800837653002900845653002300874653002200897100001900919700001900938856006800957       2009                        eng d  a978-3-642-02811-300aBrain-Computer Interaction.0 aBrainComputer Interaction  bSpringerc20093 a<p><span style="color: #333333; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px;">Detection and automated interpretation of attention-related or intention-related brain activity carries significant promise for many military and civilian applications. This interpretation of brain activity could provide information about a person’s intended movements, imagined movements, or attentional focus, and thus could be valuable for optimizing or replacing traditional motor-based communication between a person and a computer or other output devices. We describe here the objective and preliminary results of our studies in this area.</span></p>10aBCI10abrain-computer interface10aneural engineering10aneural prosthesis1 aBrunner, Peter1 aSchalk, Gerwin  uhttp://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-02812-0_8101741nas a2200253   4500008004100000022001400041245008200055210006900137260001200206300001400218490000700232520097500239653000801214653002901222653002201251653002401273100003201297700002601329700002001355700002401375700001901399700002101418856004801439       2009                        eng d  a1873-624600aA scanning protocol for a sensorimotor rhythm-based brain-computer interface.0 ascanning protocol for a sensorimotor rhythmbased braincomputer i  c02/2009  a169–1750 v803 aThe scanning protocol is a novel brain-computer interface (BCI) implementation that can be controlled with sensorimotor rhythms (SMRs) of the electroencephalogram (EEG). The user views a screen that shows four choices in a linear array with one marked as target. The four choices are successively highlighted for 2.5s each. When a target is highlighted, the user can select it by modulating the SMR. An advantage of this method is the capacity to choose among multiple choices with just one learned SMR modulation. Each of 10 naive users trained for ten 30 min sessions over 5 weeks. User performance improved significantly (p<0.001) over the sessions and ranged from 30 to 80% mean accuracy of the last three sessions (chance accuracy=25%). The incidence of correct selections depended on the target position. These results suggest that, with further improvements, a scanning protocol can be effective. The ultimate goal is to expand it to a large matrix of selections.10aBCI10abrain-computer interface10ascanning protocol10asensorimotor rhythm1 aFriedrich, Elisabeth, V. C.1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aNeuper, Christa1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aBrunner, Peter1 aWolpaw, Jonathan  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1878660301471nas a2200325   4500008004100000022001400041245006200055210005900117260001200176300001400188490000600202520059000208653000800798653002800806653000800834653000800842653002600850653002900876653002800905653000800933653000800941653002300949653002800972653001001000653001101010100002501021700003001046700002101076856004801097       2007                        eng d  a1743-444000aBrain-computer interface systems: progress and prospects.0 aBraincomputer interface systems progress and prospects  c07/2007  a463–4740 v43 aBrain-computer interface (BCI) systems support communication through direct measures of neural activity without muscle activity. BCIs may provide the best and sometimes the only communication option for users disabled by the most severe neuromuscular disorders and may eventually become useful to less severely disabled and/or healthy individuals across a wide range of applications. This review discusses the structure and functions of BCI systems, clarifies terminology and addresses practical applications. Progress and opportunities in the field are also identified and explicated.10aALS10aassistive communication10aBCI10aBMI10abrain-acuated control10abrain-computer interface10abrain-machine interface10aEEG10aERP10alocked-in syndrome10aslow cortical potential10aSSVEP10aStroke1 aAllison, Brendan, Z.1 aWolpaw, Elizabeth, Winter1 aWolpaw, Jonathan  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1760568201505nas a2200205   4500008004100000022001400041245010600055210006900161260001200230300001400242490000800256520087000264653001501134653000801149653002201157100002601179700002501205700002101230856004801251       2006                        eng d  a0079-612300aBrain-computer interface signal processing at the Wadsworth Center: mu and sensorimotor beta rhythms.0 aBraincomputer interface signal processing at the Wadsworth Cente  c02/2006  a411–4190 v1593 aThe Wadsworth brain-computer interface (BCI), based on mu and beta sensorimotor rhythms, uses one- and two-dimensional cursor movement tasks and relies on user training. This is a real-time closed-loop system. Signal processing consists of channel selection, spatial filtering, and spectral analysis. Feature translation uses a regression approach and normalization. Adaptation occurs at several points in this process on the basis of different criteria and methods. It can use either feedforward (e.g., estimating the signal mean for normalization) or feedback control (e.g., estimating feature weights for the prediction equation). We view this process as the interaction between a dynamic user and a dynamic system that coadapt over time. Understanding the dynamics of this interaction and optimizing its performance represent a major challenge for BCI research.10aadaptation10aBCI10aSignal Processing1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aKrusienski, Dean, J.1 aWolpaw, Jonathan  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1707124502685nas a2200433   4500008004100000022001400041245011000055210006900165260001200234300001600246490000700262520140200269653003101671653000801702653001601710653002901726653000801755653000801763653002801771653003601799653001401835653000901849653001901858653003201877653002901909100002401938700002601962700001901988700002402007700001902031700002102050700002002071700002002091700002402111700002402135700002302159700002102182856004802203       2004                        eng d  a0018-929400aThe BCI Competition 2003: progress and perspectives in detection and discrimination of EEG single trials.0 aBCI Competition 2003 progress and perspectives in detection and   c06/2004  a1044–10510 v513 aInterest in developing a new method of man-to-machine communication–a brain-computer interface (BCI)–has grown steadily over the past few decades. BCIs create a new communication channel between the brain and an output device by bypassing conventional motor output pathways of nerves and muscles. These systems use signals recorded from the scalp, the surface of the cortex, or from inside the brain to enable users to control a variety of applications including simple word-processing software and orthotics. BCI technology could therefore provide a new communication and control option for individuals who cannot otherwise express their wishes to the outside world. Signal processing and classification methods are essential tools in the development of improved BCI technology. We organized the BCI Competition 2003 to evaluate the current state of the art of these tools. Four laboratories well versed in EEG-based BCI research provided six data sets in a documented format. We made these data sets (i.e., labeled training sets and unlabeled test sets) and their descriptions available on the Internet. The goal in the competition was to maximize the performance measure for the test labels. Researchers worldwide tested their algorithms and competed for the best classification results. This paper describes the six data sets and the results and function of the most successful algorithms.10aaugmentative communication10aBCI10abeta-rhythm10abrain-computer interface10aEEG10aERP10aimagined hand movements10alateralized readiness potential10amu-rhythm10aP30010aRehabilitation10asingle-trial classification10aslow cortical potentials1 aBlankertz, Benjamin1 aMüller, Klaus-Robert1 aCurio, Gabriel1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aSchlögl, Alois1 aNeuper, Christa1 aPfurtscheller, Gert1 aHinterberger, Thilo1 aSchröder, Michael1 aBirbaumer, Niels  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15188876