02846nas a2200241   4500008004100000245008500041210006900126260001200195490000600207520209000213653000802303653002502311653001902336653001302355653003002368100002002398700001702418700001902435700002002454700002402474700001702498856008902515       2020                        eng d00aBCI-based sensorimotor rhythm training can affect individuated finger movements 0 aBCIbased sensorimotor rhythm training can affect individuated fi  c06/20200 v73 aBrain-computer interface (BCI) technology can restore communication and control to people who are severely paralyzed. BCI technology might also be able to enhance rehabilitation of motor function. We have previously shown that pre-movement sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) amplitude affects reaction time and performance on a joystick-based cursor movement task. The present study explores in adults without motor impairment the possibility that pre-movement SMR amplitude affects performance of individuated finger movements. In Phase 1, 8 individuals performed a finger flexion task that was monitored by an exoskeleton. During a 1-sec preparatory period, two colored targets on a video monitor cued flexion of the index finger, middle finger, both fingers, or neither finger; sudden color change then triggered the movement (or non-movement). SMR features (i.e. EEG amplitudes in specific frequency bands at specific scalp locations) in the pre-movement EEG that correlated with movement versus no movement were identified. In Phase 2, the participants learned to increase or decrease these SMR features to control a two-target BCI task. Finally, in Phase 3, they were asked to increase or decrease the SMR features to initiate the finger flexion task of Phase 1 and the impact on finger flexion performance was assessed. After BCI training, pre-movement SMR feature amplitude affected performance in a subset of individuals: lower amplitude was associated with shorter movement onset. In a subset of individuals, the beneficial effect on performance of lower SMR amplitude was greater when both fingers were flexed than when one was flexed and the other remained extended; thus, the impact of SMR amplitude modulation depended on the specificity of the subsequent motor task. These results indicate that BCI-based training of SMR activity in the pre-movement preparatory period can affect finger movements in a subset of individuals. They encourage studies that integrate such training into rehabilitation protocols and examine its capacity to enhance restoration of useful hand function.10aBCI10amovement preparation10aRehabilitation10aRobotics10asensorimotor beta rhythms1 aMcFarland, D.J.1 aNorman, S.L.1 aSarnacki, W.A.1 aWolbrecht, E.T.1 aReinkensmeyer, D.J.1 aWolpaw, J.R.  uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/2326263X.2020.1763060?journalCode=tbci2001153nas a2200205   4500008004100000022001400041245003300055210003100088260001300119300001400132490000800146520060000154653003100754653001300785653002200798100002000820700001800840700001800858856007100876       2016                        eng d  a0079-612300aChapter 13 - BCI in practice0 aChapter 13 BCI in practice  bElsevier  a389 - 4040 v2283 aBrain–computer interfaces are systems that use signals recorded from the brain to enable communication and control applications for individuals who have impaired function. This technology has developed to the point that it is now being used by individuals who can actually benefit from it. However, there are several outstanding issues that prevent widespread use. These include the ease of obtaining high-quality recordings by home users, the speed, and accuracy of current devices and adapting applications to the needs of the user. In this chapter, we discuss some of these unsolved issues.10aBrain–computer interface10aHome use10aNeurotechnologies1 aMcFarland, D.J.1 aVaughan, T.M.1 aCoyle, Damien  uhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0079612316300917