01419nas a2200181   4500008004100000022001400041245011600055210006900171260001200240300001000252490000600262520084000268653001601108100001801124700002601142700002101168856004801189       2010                        eng d  a1741-255200aA comparison of regression techniques for a two-dimensional sensorimotor rhythm-based brain-computer interface.0 acomparison of regression techniques for a twodimensional sensori  c02/2010  a160030 v73 aPeople can learn to control electroencephalogram (EEG) features consisting of sensorimotor-rhythm amplitudes and use this control to move a cursor in one, two or three dimensions to a target on a video screen. This study evaluated several possible alternative models for translating these EEG features into two-dimensional cursor movement by building an offline simulation using data collected during online performance. In offline comparisons, support-vector regression (SVM) with a radial basis kernel produced somewhat better performance than simple multiple regression, the LASSO or a linear SVM. These results indicate that proper choice of a translation algorithm is an important factor in optimizing brain-computer interface (BCI) performance, and provide new insight into algorithm choice for multidimensional movement control.10aYoung Adult1 aFruitet, Joan1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aWolpaw, Jonathan  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2007550302830nas a2200337   4500008004100000022001400041245004900055210004500104260001200149300001100161490000600172520196200178653001002140653003502150653001802185653001102203653001102214653000902225653001602234653002502250653002302275653002802298653001602326100001902342700001302361700001502374700002102389700001502410700001902425856004802444       2010                        eng d  a1741-255200aDoes the 'P300' speller depend on eye gaze?.0 aDoes the P300 speller depend on eye gaze  c10/2010  a0560130 v73 a<p><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 17px;">Many people affected by debilitating neuromuscular disorders such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, brainstem stroke or spinal cord injury are impaired in their ability to, or are even unable to, communicate. A brain-computer interface (BCI) uses brain signals, rather than muscles, to re-establish communication with the outside world. One particular BCI approach is the so-called 'P300 matrix speller' that was first described by Farwell and Donchin (1988 Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 70 510-23). It has been widely assumed that this method does not depend on the ability to focus on the desired character, because it was thought that it relies primarily on the P300-evoked potential and minimally, if at all, on other EEG features such as the visual-evoked potential (VEP). This issue is highly relevant for the clinical application of this BCI method, because eye movements may be impaired or lost in the relevant user population. This study investigated the extent to which the performance in a 'P300' speller BCI depends on eye gaze. We evaluated the performance of 17 healthy subjects using a 'P300' matrix speller under two conditions. Under one condition ('letter'), the subjects focused their eye gaze on the intended letter, while under the second condition ('center'), the subjects focused their eye gaze on a fixation cross that was located in the center of the matrix. The results show that the performance of the 'P300' matrix speller in normal subjects depends in considerable measure on gaze direction. They thereby disprove a widespread assumption in BCI research, and suggest that this BCI might function more effectively for people who retain some eye-movement control. The applicability of these findings to people with severe neuromuscular disabilities (particularly in eye-movements) remains to be determined.</span></p>10aAdult10aEvent-Related Potentials, P30010aEye Movements10aFemale10aHumans10aMale10aMiddle Aged10aModels, Neurological10aPhotic Stimulation10aUser-Computer Interface10aYoung Adult1 aBrunner, Peter1 aJoshi, S1 aBriskin, S1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aBischof, H1 aSchalk, Gerwin  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2085892402146nas a2200397   4500008004100000022001400041245009000055210006900145260001200214300001100226490000600237520112800243653001501371653001001386653001701396653001001413653002101423653001301444653001101457653001201468653001101480653000901491653002001500653001601520653001901536653000901555653001001564653001701574653001601591100001601607700002001623700001701643700002101660700001901681856004801700       2009                        eng d  a1741-255200aDecoding flexion of individual fingers using electrocorticographic signals in humans.0 aDecoding flexion of individual fingers using electrocorticograph  c12/2009  a0660010 v63 a<p><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 17px;">Brain signals can provide the basis for a non-muscular communication and control system, a brain-computer interface (BCI), for people with motor disabilities. A common approach to creating BCI devices is to decode kinematic parameters of movements using signals recorded by intracortical microelectrodes. Recent studies have shown that kinematic parameters of hand movements can also be accurately decoded from signals recorded by electrodes placed on the surface of the brain (electrocorticography (ECoG)). In the present study, we extend these results by demonstrating that it is also possible to decode the time course of the flexion of individual fingers using ECoG signals in humans, and by showing that these flexion time courses are highly specific to the moving finger. These results provide additional support for the hypothesis that ECoG could be the basis for powerful clinically practical BCI systems, and also indicate that ECoG is useful for studying cortical dynamics related to motor function.</span></p>10aAdolescent10aAdult10aBiomechanics10aBrain10aElectrodiagnosis10aEpilepsy10aFemale10aFingers10aHumans10aMale10aMicroelectrodes10aMiddle Aged10aMotor Activity10aRest10aThumb10aTime Factors10aYoung Adult1 aKubánek, J1 aMiller, John, W1 aOjemann, J G1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aSchalk, Gerwin  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19794237