02099nas a2200241 4500008004100000022001400041245011200055210006900167260001200236300001000248490000700258520136500265653001501630653001001645653002701655653001101682653001701693653002801710100002401738700002601762700002101788856004801809 2012 eng d a1873-274700aValue of amplitude, phase, and coherence features for a sensorimotor rhythm-based brain-computer interface.0 aValue of amplitude phase and coherence features for a sensorimot c01/2012 a130-40 v873 aMeasures that quantify the relationship between two or more brain signals are drawing attention as neuroscientists explore the mechanisms of large-scale integration that enable coherent behavior and cognition. Traditional Fourier-based measures of coherence have been used to quantify frequency-dependent relationships between two signals. More recently, several off-line studies examined phase-locking value (PLV) as a possible feature for use in brain-computer interface (BCI) systems. However, only a few individuals have been studied and full statistical comparisons among the different classes of features and their combinations have not been conducted. The present study examines the relative BCI performance of spectral power, coherence, and PLV, alone and in combination. The results indicate that spectral power produced classification at least as good as PLV, coherence, or any possible combination of these measures. This may be due to the fact that all three measures reflect mainly the activity of a single signal source (i.e., an area of sensorimotor cortex). This possibility is supported by the finding that EEG signals from different channels generally had near-zero phase differences. Coherence, PLV, and other measures of inter-channel relationships may be more valuable for BCIs that use signals from more than one distinct cortical source.10aAlgorithms10aBrain10aElectroencephalography10aHumans10aMotor Cortex10aUser-Computer Interface1 aKrusienski, Dean, J1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aWolpaw, Jonathan uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2198598403279nas a2200337 4500008004100000022001400041245011400055210006900169260001200238300001200250490000700262520231800269653001502587653001002602653001002612653001802622653002702640653001102667653001102678653000902689653001602698653004102714653002002755100001802775700001902793700002202812700001902834700002102853700001902874856004802893 2011 eng d a1095-957200aSpatiotemporal dynamics of electrocorticographic high gamma activity during overt and covert word repetition.0 aSpatiotemporal dynamics of electrocorticographic high gamma acti c02/2011 a2960-720 v543 a

Language is one of the defining abilities of humans. Many studies have characterized the neural correlates of different aspects of language processing. However, the imaging techniques typically used in these studies were limited in either their temporal or spatial resolution. Electrocorticographic (ECoG) recordings from the surface of the brain combine high spatial with high temporal resolution and thus could be a valuable tool for the study of neural correlates of language function. In this study, we defined the spatiotemporal dynamics of ECoG activity during a word repetition task in nine human subjects. ECoG was recorded while each subject overtly or covertly repeated words that were presented either visually or auditorily. ECoG amplitudes in the high gamma (HG) band confidently tracked neural changes associated with stimulus presentation and with the subject's verbal response. Overt word production was primarily associated with HG changes in the superior and middle parts of temporal lobe, Wernicke's area, the supramarginal gyrus, Broca's area, premotor cortex (PMC), primary motor cortex. Covert word production was primarily associated with HG changes in superior temporal lobe and the supramarginal gyrus. Acoustic processing from both auditory stimuli as well as the subject's own voice resulted in HG power changes in superior temporal lobe and Wernicke's area. In summary, this study represents a comprehensive characterization of overt and covert speech using electrophysiological imaging with high spatial and temporal resolution. It thereby complements the findings of previous neuroimaging studies of language and thus further adds to current understanding of word processing in humans.

10aAdolescent10aAdult10aBrain10aBrain Mapping10aElectroencephalography10aFemale10aHumans10aMale10aMiddle Aged10aSignal Processing, Computer-Assisted10aVerbal Behavior1 aPei, Xiao-Mei1 aLeuthardt, E C1 aGaona, Charles, M1 aBrunner, Peter1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aSchalk, Gerwin uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2102978402146nas a2200397 4500008004100000022001400041245009000055210006900145260001200214300001100226490000600237520112800243653001501371653001001386653001701396653001001413653002101423653001301444653001101457653001201468653001101480653000901491653002001500653001601520653001901536653000901555653001001564653001701574653001601591100001601607700002001623700001701643700002101660700001901681856004801700 2009 eng d a1741-255200aDecoding flexion of individual fingers using electrocorticographic signals in humans.0 aDecoding flexion of individual fingers using electrocorticograph c12/2009 a0660010 v63 a

Brain signals can provide the basis for a non-muscular communication and control system, a brain-computer interface (BCI), for people with motor disabilities. A common approach to creating BCI devices is to decode kinematic parameters of movements using signals recorded by intracortical microelectrodes. Recent studies have shown that kinematic parameters of hand movements can also be accurately decoded from signals recorded by electrodes placed on the surface of the brain (electrocorticography (ECoG)). In the present study, we extend these results by demonstrating that it is also possible to decode the time course of the flexion of individual fingers using ECoG signals in humans, and by showing that these flexion time courses are highly specific to the moving finger. These results provide additional support for the hypothesis that ECoG could be the basis for powerful clinically practical BCI systems, and also indicate that ECoG is useful for studying cortical dynamics related to motor function.

10aAdolescent10aAdult10aBiomechanics10aBrain10aElectrodiagnosis10aEpilepsy10aFemale10aFingers10aHumans10aMale10aMicroelectrodes10aMiddle Aged10aMotor Activity10aRest10aThumb10aTime Factors10aYoung Adult1 aKubánek, J1 aMiller, John, W1 aOjemann, J G1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aSchalk, Gerwin uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1979423705137nas a2200373 4500008004100000022001400041245007500055210006900130260001200199300001000211490000800221520406800229653001004297653001504307653001004322653001804332653002404350653002704374653001104401653000904412653002404421653002404445653001904469653003604488653004104524653002404565653002804589100001904617700001904636700002404655700001504679700002104694856004804715 2008 eng d a0165-027000aBrain-computer interfaces (BCIs): Detection Instead of Classification.0 aBraincomputer interfaces BCIs Detection Instead of Classificatio c01/2008 a51-620 v1673 a

Many studies over the past two decades have shown that people can use brain signals to convey their intent to a computer through brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). These devices operate by recording signals from the brain and translating these signals into device commands. They can be used by people who are severely paralyzed to communicate without any use of muscle activity. One of the major impediments in translating this novel technology into clinical applications is the current requirement for preliminary analyses to identify the brain signal features best suited for communication. This paper introduces and validates signal detection, which does not require such analysis procedures, as a new concept in BCI signal processing. This detection concept is realized with Gaussian mixture models (GMMs) that are used to model resting brain activity so that any change in relevant brain signals can be detected. It is implemented in a package called SIGFRIED (SIGnal modeling For Real-time Identification and Event Detection). The results indicate that SIGFRIED produces results that are within the range of those achieved using a common analysis strategy that requires preliminary identification of signal features. They indicate that such laborious analysis procedures could be replaced by merely recording brain signals during rest. In summary, this paper demonstrates how SIGFRIED could be used to overcome one of the present impediments to translation of laboratory BCI demonstrations into clinically practical applications.

10aAdult10aAlgorithms10aBrain10aBrain Mapping10aElectrocardiography10aElectroencephalography10aHumans10aMale10aMan-Machine Systems10aNormal Distribution10aOnline Systems10aSignal Detection, Psychological10aSignal Processing, Computer-Assisted10aSoftware Validation10aUser-Computer Interface1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aBrunner, Peter1 aGerhardt, Lester, A1 aBischof, H1 aWolpaw, Jonathan uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1792013404357nas a2200385 4500008004100000022001400041245009700055210006900152260001200221300001200233490000800245520323100253653001503484653001003499653001403509653001003523653001803533653004203551653002703593653003003620653001103650653001103661653000903672653003203681653002303713653002203736653002803758100002503786700002603811700001903837700002003856700002603876700002103902856004803923 2008 eng d a1388-245700aTowards an independent brain-computer interface using steady state visual evoked potentials.0 aTowards an independent braincomputer interface using steady stat c02/2008 a399-4080 v1193 a

OBJECTIVE: 

Brain-computer interface (BCI) systems using steady state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) have allowed healthy subjects to communicate. However, these systems may not work in severely disabled users because they may depend on gaze shifting. This study evaluates the hypothesis that overlapping stimuli can evoke changes in SSVEP activity sufficient to control a BCI. This would provide evidence that SSVEP BCIs could be used without shifting gaze.

METHODS: 

Subjects viewed a display containing two images that each oscillated at a different frequency. Different conditions used overlapping or non-overlapping images to explore dependence on gaze function. Subjects were asked to direct attention to one or the other of these images during each of 12 one-minute runs.

RESULTS: 

Half of the subjects produced differences in SSVEP activity elicited by overlapping stimuli that could support BCI control. In all remaining users, differences did exist at corresponding frequencies but were not strong enough to allow effective control.

CONCLUSIONS: 

The data demonstrate that SSVEP differences sufficient for BCI control may be elicited by selective attention to one of two overlapping stimuli. Thus, some SSVEP-based BCI approaches may not depend on gaze control. The nature and extent of any BCI's dependence on muscle activity is a function of many factors, including the display, task, environment, and user.

SIGNIFICANCE: 

SSVEP BCIs might function in severely disabled users unable to reliably control gaze. Further research with these users is necessary to explore the optimal parameters of such a system and validate online performance in a home environment.

10aAdolescent10aAdult10aAttention10aBrain10aBrain Mapping10aDose-Response Relationship, Radiation10aElectroencephalography10aEvoked Potentials, Visual10aFemale10aHumans10aMale10aPattern Recognition, Visual10aPhotic Stimulation10aSpectrum Analysis10aUser-Computer Interface1 aAllison, Brendan, Z.1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aZheng, Shi Dong1 aMoore-Jackson, Melody1 aWolpaw, Jonathan uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1807720803802nas a2200385 4500008004100000022001400041245008700055210006900142260001200211300001000223490000700233520264300240653001502883653001002898653003602908653002302944653002702967653002202994653001103016653002703027653002403054653003803078653002803116100002403144700002603168700002403194700001903218700002103237700002003258700002403278700002203302700002303324700002103347856004803368 2006 eng d a1534-432000aThe BCI competition III: Validating alternative approaches to actual BCI problems.0 aBCI competition III Validating alternative approaches to actual  c06/2006 a153-90 v143 a

brain-computer interface (BCI) is a system that allows its users to control external devices with brainactivity. Although the proof-of-concept was given decades ago, the reliable translation of user intent into device control commands is still a major challenge. Success requires the effective interaction of two adaptive controllers: the user's brain, which produces brain activity that encodes intent, and the BCI system, which translates that activity into device control commands. In order to facilitate this interaction, many laboratories are exploring a variety of signal analysis techniques to improve the adaptation of the BCI system to the user. In the literature, many machine learning and pattern classification algorithms have been reported to give impressive results when applied to BCI data in offline analyses. However, it is more difficult to evaluate their relative value for actual online use. BCI data competitions have been organized to provide objective formal evaluations of alternative methods. Prompted by the great interest in the first two BCI Competitions, we organized the third BCI Competition to address several of the most difficult and important analysis problems in BCI research. The paper describes the data sets that were provided to the competitors and gives an overview of the results.

10aAlgorithms10aBrain10aCommunication Aids for Disabled10aDatabases, Factual10aElectroencephalography10aEvoked Potentials10aHumans10aNeuromuscular Diseases10aSoftware Validation10aTechnology Assessment, Biomedical10aUser-Computer Interface1 aBlankertz, Benjamin1 aMüller, Klaus-Robert1 aKrusienski, Dean, J1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aSchlögl, Alois1 aPfurtscheller, Gert1 aMillán, José, R1 aSchröder, Michael1 aBirbaumer, Niels uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1679228202977nas a2200361 4500008004100000022001400041245007400055210006800129260001200197300001100209490000700220520195300227653001202180653001002192653002702202653002202229653001102251653002702262653001302289653001302302653001602315653003102331653001702362653002802379100002402407700002602431700001902457700002502476700002402501700002102525700002102546856004802567 2006 eng d a1534-432000aThe Wadsworth BCI Research and Development Program: At Home with BCI.0 aWadsworth BCI Research and Development Program At Home with BCI c06/2006 a229-330 v143 a

The ultimate goal of brain-computer interface (BCI) technology is to provide communication and control capacities to people with severe motor disabilities. BCI research at the Wadsworth Center focuses primarily on noninvasive, electroencephalography (EEG)-based BCI methods. We have shown that people, including those with severe motor disabilities, can learn to use sensorimotor rhythms (SMRs) to move a cursor rapidly and accurately in one or two dimensions. We have also improved P300-based BCI operation. We are now translating this laboratory-proven BCI technology into a system that can be used by severely disabled people in their homes with minimal ongoing technical oversight. To accomplish this, we have: improved our general-purpose BCI software (BCI2000); improved online adaptation and feature translation for SMR-based BCI operation; improved the accuracy and bandwidth of P300-based BCI operation; reduced the complexity of system hardware and software and begun to evaluate home system use in appropriate users. These developments have resulted in prototype systems for every day use in people's homes.

10aAnimals10aBrain10aElectroencephalography10aEvoked Potentials10aHumans10aNeuromuscular Diseases10aNew York10aResearch10aSwitzerland10aTherapy, Computer-Assisted10aUniversities10aUser-Computer Interface1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aSarnacki, William, A1 aKrusienski, Dean, J1 aSellers, Eric, W1 aWolpaw, Jonathan uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1679230102760nas a2200433 4500008004100000022001400041245011000055210006900165260001200234300001200246490000700258520140000265653001001665653001501675653003401690653002801724653001001752653001401762653002301776653002701799653002201826653001101848653003101859653003201890653002801922100002401950700002601974700001902000700002402019700001902043700002102062700002002083700002002103700002402123700002002147700002302167700002102190856011502211 2004 eng d a0018-929400aThe BCI Competition 2003: Progress and perspectives in detection and discrimination of EEG single trials.0 aBCI Competition 2003 Progress and perspectives in detection and  c06/2004 a1044-510 v513 aInterest in developing a new method of man-to-machine communication--a brain-computer interface (BCI)--has grown steadily over the past few decades. BCIs create a new communication channel between the brain and an output device by bypassing conventional motor output pathways of nerves and muscles. These systems use signals recorded from the scalp, the surface of the cortex, or from inside the brain to enable users to control a variety of applications including simple word-processing software and orthotics. BCI technology could therefore provide a new communication and control option for individuals who cannot otherwise express their wishes to the outside world. Signal processing and classification methods are essential tools in the development of improved BCI technology. We organized the BCI Competition 2003 to evaluate the current state of the art of these tools. Four laboratories well versed in EEG-based BCI research provided six data sets in a documented format. We made these data sets (i.e., labeled training sets and unlabeled test sets) and their descriptions available on the Internet. The goal in the competition was to maximize the performance measure for the test labels. Researchers worldwide tested their algorithms and competed for the best classification results. This paper describes the six data sets and the results and function of the most successful algorithms.10aAdult10aAlgorithms10aAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis10aArtificial Intelligence10aBrain10aCognition10aDatabases, Factual10aElectroencephalography10aEvoked Potentials10aHumans10aReproducibility of Results10aSensitivity and Specificity10aUser-Computer Interface1 aBlankertz, Benjamin1 aMüller, Klaus-Robert1 aCurio, Gabriel1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aSchlögl, Alois1 aNeuper, Christa1 aPfurtscheller, Gert1 aHinterberger, T1 aSchröder, Michael1 aBirbaumer, Niels uhttps://www.neurotechcenter.org/publications/2004/bci-competition-2003-progress-and-perspectives-detection-and02705nas a2200337 4500008004100000022001400041245007000055210006400125260001200189300001200201490000700213520166200220653001501882653001001897653001401907653003601921653002501957653002701982653002102009653003102030653002202061653001102083653002402094653002802118100001902146700002602165700002002191700002102211700002102232856011402253 2004 eng d a0018-929400aBCI2000: a general-purpose brain-computer interface (BCI) system.0 aBCI2000 a generalpurpose braincomputer interface BCI system c06/2004 a1034-430 v513 aMany laboratories have begun to develop brain-computer interface (BCI) systems that provide communication and control capabilities to people with severe motor disabilities. Further progress and realization of practical applications depends on systematic evaluations and comparisons of different brain signals, recording methods, processing algorithms, output formats, and operating protocols. However, the typical BCI system is designed specifically for one particular BCI method and is, therefore, not suited to the systematic studies that are essential for continued progress. In response to this problem, we have developed a documented general-purpose BCI research and development platform called BCI2000. BCI2000 can incorporate alone or in combination any brain signals, signal processing methods, output devices, and operating protocols. This report is intended to describe to investigators, biomedical engineers, and computer scientists the concepts that the BC12000 system is based upon and gives examples of successful BCI implementations using this system. To date, we have used BCI2000 to create BCI systems for a variety of brain signals, processing methods, and applications. The data show that these systems function well in online operation and that BCI2000 satisfies the stringent real-time requirements of BCI systems. By substantially reducing labor and cost, BCI2000 facilitates the implementation of different BCI systems and other psychophysiological experiments. It is available with full documentation and free of charge for research or educational purposes and is currently being used in a variety of studies by many research groups.10aAlgorithms10aBrain10aCognition10aCommunication Aids for Disabled10aComputer Peripherals10aElectroencephalography10aEquipment Design10aEquipment Failure Analysis10aEvoked Potentials10aHumans10aSystems Integration10aUser-Computer Interface1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aHinterberger, T1 aBirbaumer, Niels1 aWolpaw, Jonathan uhttps://www.neurotechcenter.org/publications/2004/bci2000-general-purpose-brain-computer-interface-bci-system03554nas a2200361 4500008004100000022001400041245007800055210006900133260001200202300001000214490000600224520253800230653001002768653001002778653003602788653002502824653003302849653002602882653002702908653002202935653001102957653001102968653001602979653000902995653002303004653002803027100001903055700001903074700002103093700001703114700001303131856004803144 2004 eng d a1741-256000aA brain-computer interface using electrocorticographic signals in humans.0 abraincomputer interface using electrocorticographic signals in h c06/2004 a63-710 v13 a

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) enable users to control devices with electroencephalographic (EEG) activity from the scalp or with single-neuron activity from within the brain. Both methods have disadvantages: EEG has limited resolution and requires extensive training, while single-neuron recording entails significant clinical risks and has limited stability. We demonstrate here for the first time that electrocorticographic (ECoG) activity recorded from the surface of the brain can enable users to control a one-dimensional computer cursor rapidly and accurately. We first identified ECoG signals that were associated with different types of motor and speech imagery. Over brief training periods of 3-24 min, four patients then used these signals to master closed-loop control and to achieve success rates of 74-100% in a one-dimensional binary task. In additional open-loop experiments, we found that ECoG signals at frequencies up to 180 Hz encoded substantial information about the direction of two-dimensional joystick movements. Our results suggest that an ECoG-based BCI could provide for people with severe motor disabilities a non-muscular communication and control option that is more powerful than EEG-based BCIs and is potentially more stable and less traumatic than BCIs that use electrodes penetrating the brain.

10aAdult10aBrain10aCommunication Aids for Disabled10aComputer Peripherals10aDiagnosis, Computer-Assisted10aElectrodes, Implanted10aElectroencephalography10aEvoked Potentials10aFemale10aHumans10aImagination10aMale10aMovement Disorders10aUser-Computer Interface1 aLeuthardt, E C1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aOjemann, J G1 aMoran, D uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1587662403064nas a2200373 4500008004100000022001400041245009000055210006900145260001200214300001000226490000700236520200500243653002902248653001002277653001502287653001402302653001002316653001802326653002702344653003002371653001302401653001102414653001602425653002802441653001302469653002002482653002802502653002202530100002102552700002602573700002402599700001902623856004802642 2003 eng d a1534-432000aThe Wadsworth Center brain-computer interface (BCI) research and development program.0 aWadsworth Center braincomputer interface BCI research and develo c06/2003 a204-70 v113 a

Brain-computer interface (BCI) research at the Wadsworth Center has focused primarily on using electroencephalogram (EEG) rhythms recorded from the scalp over sensorimotor cortex to control cursor movement in one or two dimensions. Recent and current studies seek to improve the speed and accuracy of this control by improving the selection of signal features and their translation into device commands, by incorporating additional signal features, and by optimizing the adaptive interaction between the user and system. In addition, to facilitate the evaluation, comparison, and combination of alternative BCI methods, we have developed a general-purpose BCI system called BCI-2000 and have made it available to other research groups. Finally, in collaboration with several other groups, we are developing simple BCI applications and are testing their practicality and long-term value for people with severe motor disabilities.

10aAcademic Medical Centers10aAdult10aAlgorithms10aArtifacts10aBrain10aBrain Mapping10aElectroencephalography10aEvoked Potentials, Visual10aFeedback10aHumans10aMiddle Aged10aNervous System Diseases10aResearch10aResearch Design10aUser-Computer Interface10aVisual Perception1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aSchalk, Gerwin uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1289927501213nas a2200313 4500008004100000022001400041245005000055210004500105300001400150490000700164520043400171653001300605653001000618653001700628653002100645653001300666653001100679653001500690653001100705653001200716653001100728653001600739653001600755653002200771653001500793100002100808700002300829856004700852 1993 eng d a0065-140000aThe volitional nature of the simplest reflex.0 avolitional nature of the simplest reflex a103–1110 v533 aRecent studies suggest that none of the behaviors of the vertebrate CNS are fixed responses incapable of change. Even the simplest reflex of all, the two-neuron, monosynaptic spinal stretch reflex (SSR), undergoes adaptive change under appropriate circumstances. Operantly conditioned SSR change occurs gradually over days and weeks and is associated with a complex pattern of CNS plasticity at both spinal and supraspinal sites.10abehavior10aBrain10aconditioning10ahuman physiology10aLearning10aMemory10amotoneuron10anature10aprimate10aReflex10aSpinal Cord10aspinal site10asupra spinal site10avertebrate1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aCarp, Jonathan, S. uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8317238