07936nas a2200361 4500008004100000022001400041245009600055210006900151260001200220300001100232490000800243520694900251653001507200653001007215653002807225653002007253653001007273653002507283653002407308653001107332653001107343653000907354653001607363653001907379653001607398100001607414700001907430700002207449700001707471700001707488700002107505856004807526 2010 eng d a1091-649000aCortical activity during motor execution, motor imagery, and imagery-based online feedback.0 aCortical activity during motor execution motor imagery and image c03/2010 a4430-50 v1073 a

Imagery of motor movement plays an important role in learning of complex motor skills, from learning to serve in tennis to perfecting a pirouette in ballet. What and where are the neural substrates that underlie motor imagery-based learning? We measured electrocorticographic cortical surface potentials in eight human subjects during overt action and kinesthetic imagery of the same movement, focusing on power in "high frequency" (76-100 Hz) and "low frequency" (8-32 Hz) ranges. We quantitatively establish that the spatial distribution of local neuronal population activity during motor imagery mimics the spatial distribution of activity during actual motor movement. By comparing responses to electrocortical stimulation with imagery-induced cortical surface activity, we demonstrate the role of primary motor areas in movement imagery. The magnitude of imagery-induced cortical activity change was approximately 25% of that associated with actual movement. However, when subjects learned to use this imagery to control a computer cursor in a simple feedback task, the imagery-induced activity change was significantly augmented, even exceeding that of overt movement.

10aAdolescent10aAdult10aBiofeedback, Psychology10aCerebral Cortex10aChild10aElectric Stimulation10aElectrocardiography10aFemale10aHumans10aMale10aMiddle Aged10aMotor Activity10aYoung Adult1 aMiller, K J1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aFetz, Eberhard, E1 aNijs, Marcel1 aOjemann, J G1 aRao, Rajesh, P N uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2016008404251nas a2200505 4500008004100000022001400041245009900055210006900154260001200223300001200235490000700247520283600254653003103090653001503121653001003136653001003146653001003156653002703166653002903193653001103222653001103233653001303244653000903257653001603266653001703282653003303299653001903332653002803351653001303379653002203392653001303414653004303427653002803470653001303498100001603511700002203527700001803549700002103567700001903588700002103607700002203628700002703650700002003677856004803697 2008 eng d a0361-923000aNon-invasive brain-computer interface system: towards its application as assistive technology.0 aNoninvasive braincomputer interface system towards its applicati c04/2008 a796-8030 v753 a

The quality of life of people suffering from severe motor disabilities can benefit from the use of current assistive technology capable of ameliorating communication, house-environment management and mobility, according to the user's residual motor abilities. Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are systems that can translate brain activity into signals that control external devices. Thus they can represent the only technology for severely paralyzed patients to increase or maintain their communication and control options. Here we report on a pilot study in which a system was implemented and validated to allow disabled persons to improve or recover their mobility (directly or by emulation) and communication within the surrounding environment. The system is based on a software controller that offers to the user a communication interface that is matched with the individual's residual motor abilities. Patients (n=14) with severe motor disabilities due to progressive neurodegenerative disorders were trained to use the system prototype under a rehabilitation program carried out in a house-like furnished space. All users utilized regular assistive control options (e.g., microswitches or head trackers). In addition, four subjects learned to operate the system by means of a non-invasive EEG-based BCI. This system was controlled by the subjects' voluntary modulations of EEG sensorimotor rhythms recorded on the scalp; this skill was learnt even though the subjects have not had control over their limbs for a long time. We conclude that such a prototype system, which integrates several different assistive technologies including a BCI system, can potentially facilitate the translation from pre-clinical demonstrations to a clinical useful BCI.

10aActivities of Daily Living10aAdolescent10aAdult10aBrain10aChild10aElectroencephalography10aEvoked Potentials, Motor10aFemale10aHumans10aLearning10aMale10aMiddle Aged10aMotor Skills10aMuscular Dystrophy, Duchenne10aPilot Projects10aProstheses and Implants10aRobotics10aSelf-Help Devices10aSoftware10aSpinal Muscular Atrophies of Childhood10aUser-Computer Interface10aVolition1 aCincotti, F1 aMattia, Donatella1 aAloise, Fabio1 aBufalari, Simona1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aOriolo, Giuseppe1 aCherubini, Andrea1 aMarciani, Maria Grazia1 aBabiloni, Fabio uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1839452604121nas a2200457 4500008004100000022001400041245010800055210006900163260001200232300001100244490000700255520290000262653001503162653001003177653002103187653001203208653001803220653001003238653002403248653002703272653001103299653000903310653001103319653000903330653001603339653001703355653001303372653001203385653002203397653002803419653001103447653002803458653001303486100002303499700002603522700001903548700001603567700001303583700001903596856004803615 2008 eng d a1524-462800aUnique cortical physiology associated with ipsilateral hand movements and neuroprosthetic implications.0 aUnique cortical physiology associated with ipsilateral hand move c12/2008 a3351-90 v393 a

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: 

Brain computer interfaces (BCIs) offer little direct benefit to patients with hemispheric stroke because current platforms rely on signals derived from the contralateral motor cortex (the same region injured by the stroke). For BCIs to assist hemiparetic patients, the implant must use unaffected cortex ipsilateral to the affected limb. This requires the identification of distinct electrophysiological features from the motor cortex associated with ipsilateral hand movements.

METHODS: 

In this study we studied 6 patients undergoing temporary placement of intracranial electrode arrays. Electrocorticographic (ECoG) signals were recorded while the subjects engaged in specific ipsilateral or contralateral hand motor tasks. Spectral changes were identified with regards to frequency, location, and timing.

RESULTS: 

Ipsilateral hand movements were associated with electrophysiological changes that occur in lower frequency spectra, at distinct anatomic locations, and earlier than changes associated with contralateral hand movements. In a subset of 3 patients, features specific to ipsilateral and contralateral hand movements were used to control a cursor on a screen in real time. In ipsilateral derived control this was optimal with lower frequency spectra.

CONCLUSIONS: 

There are distinctive cortical electrophysiological features associated with ipsilateral movements which can be used for device control. These findings have implications for patients with hemispheric stroke because they offer a potential methodology for which a single hemisphere can be used to enhance the function of a stroke induced hemiparesis.

10aAdolescent10aAdult10aArtificial Limbs10aBionics10aBrain Mapping10aChild10aDominance, Cerebral10aElectroencephalography10aFemale10aHand10aHumans10aMale10aMiddle Aged10aMotor Cortex10aMovement10aParesis10aProsthesis Design10aPsychomotor Performance10aStroke10aUser-Computer Interface10aVolition1 aWisneski, Kimberly1 aAnderson, Nicholas, R1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aSmyth, Matt1 aMoran, D1 aLeuthardt, E C uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18927456