02231nas a2200205   4500008004100000245007600041210006900117260001200186520158000198653001401778653000801792653001001800653002201810653003101832100001601863700002501879700002501904700001901929856007701948       2015                        eng d00aCortical alpha activity predicts the confidence in an impending action.0 aCortical alpha activity predicts the confidence in an impending   c07/20153 aWhen we make a decision, we experience a degree of confidence that our choice may lead to a desirable outcome. Recent studies in animals have probed the subjective aspects of the choice confidence using confidence-reporting tasks. These studies showed that estimates of the choice confidence substantially modulate neural activity in multiple regions of the brain. Building on these findings, we investigated the neural representation of the confidence in a choice in humans who explicitly reported the confidence in their choice. Subjects performed a perceptual decision task in which they decided between choosing a button press or a saccade while we recorded EEG activity. Following each choice, subjects indicated whether they were sure or unsure about the choice. We found that alpha activity strongly encodes a subject's confidence level in a forthcoming button press choice. The neural effect of the subjects' confidence was independent of the reaction time and independent of the sensory input modeled as a decision variable. Furthermore, the effect is not due to a general cognitive state, such as reward expectation, because the effect was specifically observed during button press choices and not during saccade choices. The neural effect of the confidence in the ensuing button press choice was strong enough that we could predict, from independent single trial neural signals, whether a subject was going to be sure or unsure of an ensuing button press choice. In sum, alpha activity in human cortex provides a window into the commitment to make a hand movement.10acertainty10aEEG10ahuman10aneural correlates10aperceptual decision-making1 aKubánek, J1 aHill, Jeremy, Jeremy1 aSnyder, Lawrence, H.1 aSchalk, Gerwin  uhttp://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnins.2015.00243/abstract02073nas a2200241   4500008004100000022001400041245011100055210006900166260001200235300001100247490000700258520141600265653001001681653000801691653000901699653000801708653001201716653001101728653000801739100001701747700001901764856004801783       2015                        eng d  a1559-008900aNeuralAct: A Tool to Visualize Electrocortical (ECoG) Activity on a Three-Dimensional Model of the Cortex.0 aNeuralAct A Tool to Visualize Electrocortical ECoG Activity on a  c04/2015  a167-740 v133 a<p>Electrocorticography (ECoG) records neural signals directly from the surface of the cortex. Due to its high temporal and favorable spatial resolution, ECoG has emerged as a valuable new tool in acquiring cortical activity in cognitive and systems neuroscience. Many studies using ECoG visualized topographies of cortical activity or statistical tests on a three-dimensional model of the cortex, but a dedicated tool for this function has not yet been described. In this paper, we describe the NeuralAct package that serves this purpose. This package takes as input the 3D coordinates of the recording sensors, a cortical model in the same coordinate system (e.g., Talairach), and the activation data to be visualized at each sensor. It then aligns the sensor coordinates with the cortical model, convolves the activation data with a spatial kernel, and renders the resulting activations in color on the cortical model. The NeuralAct package can plot cortical activations of an individual subject as well as activations averaged over subjects. It is capable to render single images as well as sequences of images. The software runs under Matlab and is stable and robust. We here provide the tool and describe its visualization capabilities and procedures. The provided package contains thoroughly documented code and includes a simple demo that guides the researcher through the functionality of the tool.</p>10aBrain10aDOT10aECoG10aEEG10aimaging10aMatlab10aMEG1 aKubanek, Jan1 aSchalk, Gerwin  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2538164102627nas a2200277   4500008004100000245009500041210006900136260001200205490000600217520181900223653002602042653001402068653000902082653000802091653002802099653000802127100002202135700002002157700001702177700001902194700001902213700002602232700002302258700002002281856004802301       2014                        eng d00aAssessing dynamics, spatial scale, and uncertainty in task-related brain network analyses.0 aAssessing dynamics spatial scale and uncertainty in taskrelated   c03/20140 v83 aThe brain is a complex network of interconnected elements, whose interactions evolve dynamically in time to cooperatively perform specific functions. A common technique to probe these interactions involves multi-sensor recordings of brain activity during a repeated task. Many techniques exist to characterize the resulting task-related activity, including establishing functional networks, which represent the statistical associations between brain areas. Although functional network inference is commonly employed to analyze neural time series data, techniques to assess the uncertainty—both in the functional network edges and the corresponding aggregate measures of network topology—are lacking. To address this, we describe a statistically principled approach for computing uncertainty in functional networks and aggregate network measures in task-related data. The approach is based on a resampling procedure that utilizes the trial structure common in experimental recordings. We show in simulations that this approach successfully identifies functional networks and associated measures of confidence emergent during a task in a variety of scenarios, including dynamically evolving networks. In addition, we describe a principled technique for establishing functional networks based on predetermined regions of interest using canonical correlation. Doing so provides additional robustness to the functional network inference. Finally, we illustrate the use of these methods on example invasive brain voltage recordings collected during an overt speech task. The general strategy described here—appropriate for static and dynamic network inference and different statistical measures of coupling—permits the evaluation of confidence in network measures in a variety of settings common to neuroscience.10acanonical correlation10acoherence10aECoG10aEEG10afunctional connectivity10aMEG1 aStephen, Emily, P1 aLepage, Kyle, Q1 aEden, Uri, T1 aBrunner, Peter1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aBrumberg, Jonathan, S1 aGuenther, Frank, H1 aKramer, Mark, A  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2467829501351nas a2200409   4500008004100000020001800041245007500059210006900134260003300203653002700236653003000263653001900293653002900312653002500341653003300366653003400399653000800433653002700441653003900468653002100507653001700528653002000545653002900565653003000594653001500624653001800639653002300657653002600680653001100706653002300717653004000740100002400780700001900804700002600823700002100849856007100870       2005                        eng d  a0-7803-8710-400aTracking of the mu rhythm using an empirically derived matched filter.0 aTracking of the mu rhythm using an empirically derived matched f  aArlington, VAbIEEEc03/200510abioelectric potentials10aBrain Computer Interfaces10abrain modeling10abrain-computer interface10acommunication device10acommunication system control10acortical mu rhythm modulation10aEEG10aElectroencephalography10aempirically derived matched filter10ahandicapped aids10alaboratories10amatched filters10amedical signal detection10amedical signal processing10amonitoring10amotor imagery10amu rhythm tracking10anoninvasive treatment10arhythm10asynchronous motors10atwo-dimensional cursor control data1 aKrusienski, Dean, J1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aWolpaw, Jonathan  uhttp://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=141955902685nas a2200433   4500008004100000022001400041245011000055210006900165260001200234300001600246490000700262520140200269653003101671653000801702653001601710653002901726653000801755653000801763653002801771653003601799653001401835653000901849653001901858653003201877653002901909100002401938700002601962700001901988700002402007700001902031700002102050700002002071700002002091700002402111700002402135700002302159700002102182856004802203       2004                        eng d  a0018-929400aThe BCI Competition 2003: progress and perspectives in detection and discrimination of EEG single trials.0 aBCI Competition 2003 progress and perspectives in detection and   c06/2004  a1044–10510 v513 aInterest in developing a new method of man-to-machine communication–a brain-computer interface (BCI)–has grown steadily over the past few decades. BCIs create a new communication channel between the brain and an output device by bypassing conventional motor output pathways of nerves and muscles. These systems use signals recorded from the scalp, the surface of the cortex, or from inside the brain to enable users to control a variety of applications including simple word-processing software and orthotics. BCI technology could therefore provide a new communication and control option for individuals who cannot otherwise express their wishes to the outside world. Signal processing and classification methods are essential tools in the development of improved BCI technology. We organized the BCI Competition 2003 to evaluate the current state of the art of these tools. Four laboratories well versed in EEG-based BCI research provided six data sets in a documented format. We made these data sets (i.e., labeled training sets and unlabeled test sets) and their descriptions available on the Internet. The goal in the competition was to maximize the performance measure for the test labels. Researchers worldwide tested their algorithms and competed for the best classification results. This paper describes the six data sets and the results and function of the most successful algorithms.10aaugmentative communication10aBCI10abeta-rhythm10abrain-computer interface10aEEG10aERP10aimagined hand movements10alateralized readiness potential10amu-rhythm10aP30010aRehabilitation10asingle-trial classification10aslow cortical potentials1 aBlankertz, Benjamin1 aMüller, Klaus-Robert1 aCurio, Gabriel1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aSchlögl, Alois1 aNeuper, Christa1 aPfurtscheller, Gert1 aHinterberger, Thilo1 aSchröder, Michael1 aBirbaumer, Niels  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15188876