03835nas a2200301 4500008004100000022001400041245015300055210006900208260001200277520274700289653005303036653004003089653003503129653003403164653003303198653003503231100002003266700002203286700002603308700002103334700001903355700002103374700001903395700002603414700002103440700002403461856004803485 2015 eng d a1872-895200aP300-based brain-computer interface (BCI) event-related potentials (ERPs): People with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) vs. age-matched controls.0 aP300based braincomputer interface BCI eventrelated potentials ER c02/20153 a

OBJECTIVE: Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) aimed at restoring communication to people with severe neuromuscular disabilities often use event-related potentials (ERPs) in scalp-recorded EEG activity. Up to the present, most research and development in this area has been done in the laboratory with young healthy control subjects. In order to facilitate the development of BCI most useful to people with disabilities, the present study set out to: (1) determine whether people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and healthy, age-matched volunteers (HVs) differ in the speed and accuracy of their ERP-based BCI use; (2) compare the ERP characteristics of these two groups; and (3) identify ERP-related factors that might enable improvement in BCI performance for people with disabilities.

METHODS: Sixteen EEG channels were recorded while people with ALS or healthy age-matched volunteers (HVs) used a P300-based BCI. The subjects with ALS had little or no remaining useful motor control (mean ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised 9.4 (±9.5SD) (range 0-25)). Each subject attended to a target item as the items in a 6×6 visual matrix flashed. The BCI used a stepwise linear discriminant function (SWLDA) to determine the item the user wished to select (i.e., the target item). Offline analyses assessed the latencies, amplitudes, and locations of ERPs to the target and non-target items for people with ALS and age-matched control subjects.

RESULTS: BCI accuracy and communication rate did not differ significantly between ALS users and HVs. Although ERP morphology was similar for the two groups, their target ERPs differed significantly in the location and amplitude of the late positivity (P300), the amplitude of the early negativity (N200), and the latency of the late negativity (LN).

CONCLUSIONS: The differences in target ERP components between people with ALS and age-matched HVs are consistent with the growing recognition that ALS may affect cortical function. The development of BCIs for use by this population may begin with studies in HVs but also needs to include studies in people with ALS. Their differences in ERP components may affect the selection of electrode montages, and might also affect the selection of presentation parameters (e.g., matrix design, stimulation rate).

SIGNIFICANCE: P300-based BCI performance in people severely disabled by ALS is similar to that of age-matched control subjects. At the same time, their ERP components differ to some degree from those of controls. Attention to these differences could contribute to the development of BCIs useful to those with ALS and possibly to others with severe neuromuscular disabilities.

10aalternative and augmentative communication (AAC)10aamyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)10aBrain-computer interface (BCI)10abrain-machine interface (BMI)10aelectroencephalography (EEG)10aevent-related potentials (ERP)1 aMcCane, Lynn, M1 aHeckman, Susan, M1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aTownsend, George1 aMak, Joseph, N1 aSellers, Eric, W1 aZeitlin, Debra1 aTenteromano, Laura, M1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aVaughan, Theresa, M uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2570394002171nas a2200289 4500008004100000022001400041245012100055210006900176260001200245300001100257490000700268520128300275653001501558653003001573653001401603653002101617653002701638653001601665653001101681653002201692653003201714100002001746700002201766700002101788700002401809856004801833 2015 eng d a1532-821X00aToward independent home use of brain-computer interfaces: a decision algorithm for selection of potential end-users.0 aToward independent home use of braincomputer interfaces a decisi c03/2015 aS27-320 v963 a

Noninvasive brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) use scalp-recorded electrical activity from the brain to control an application. Over the past 20 years, research demonstrating that BCIs can provide communication and control to individuals with severe motor impairment has increased almost exponentially. Although considerable effort has been dedicated to offline analysis for improving signal detection and translation, far less effort has been made to conduct online studies with target populations. Thus, there remains a great need for both long-term and translational BCI studies that include individuals with disabilities in their own homes. Completing these studies is the only sure means to answer questions about BCI utility and reliability. Here we suggest an algorithm for candidate selection for electroencephalographic (EEG)-based BCI home studies. This algorithm takes into account BCI end-users and their environment and should assist in study design and substantially improve subject retention rates, thereby improving the overall efficacy of BCI home studies. It is the result of a workshop at the Fifth International BCI Meeting that allowed us to leverage the expertise of multiple research laboratories and people from multiple backgrounds in BCI research.

10aAlgorithms10abrain-computer interfaces10aCognition10aDisabled Persons10aElectroencephalography10aEnvironment10aHumans10aPatient Selection10aPhysical Therapy Modalities1 aKübler, Andrea1 aHolz, Elisa, Mira1 aSellers, Eric, W1 aVaughan, Theresa, M uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2572154402595nas a2200421 4500008004100000022001400041245009200055210006900147260001200216300001100228490000700239520137400246653001001620653000901630653003401639653002801673653003001701653002801731653002701759653003501786653001101821653001101832653000901843653001601852653001901868653002301887653002801910653001801938100002001956700002101976700002601997700001902023700001902042700001902061700002102080700002402101856004802125 2014 eng d a2167-922300aBrain-computer interface (BCI) evaluation in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.0 aBraincomputer interface BCI evaluation in people with amyotrophi c06/2014 a207-150 v153 aBrain-computer interfaces (BCIs) might restore communication to people severely disabled by amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) or other disorders. We sought to: 1) define a protocol for determining whether a person with ALS can use a visual P300-based BCI; 2) determine what proportion of this population can use the BCI; and 3) identify factors affecting BCI performance. Twenty-five individuals with ALS completed an evaluation protocol using a standard 6 × 6 matrix and parameters selected by stepwise linear discrimination. With an 8-channel EEG montage, the subjects fell into two groups in BCI accuracy (chance accuracy 3%). Seventeen averaged 92 (± 3)% (range 71-100%), which is adequate for communication (G70 group). Eight averaged 12 (± 6)% (range 0-36%), inadequate for communication (L40 subject group). Performance did not correlate with disability: 11/17 (65%) of G70 subjects were severely disabled (i.e. ALSFRS-R < 5). All L40 subjects had visual impairments (e.g. nystagmus, diplopia, ptosis). P300 was larger and more anterior in G70 subjects. A 16-channel montage did not significantly improve accuracy. In conclusion, most people severely disabled by ALS could use a visual P300-based BCI for communication. In those who could not, visual impairment was the principal obstacle. For these individuals, auditory P300-based BCIs might be effective.10aAdult10aAged10aAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis10aBiofeedback, Psychology10abrain-computer interfaces10aCommunication Disorders10aElectroencephalography10aEvent-Related Potentials, P30010aFemale10aHumans10aMale10aMiddle Aged10aOnline Systems10aPhotic Stimulation10aPsychomotor Performance10aReaction Time1 aMcCane, Lynn, M1 aSellers, Eric, W1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aMak, Joseph, N1 aCarmack, Steve1 aZeitlin, Debra1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aVaughan, Theresa, M uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2455584303178nas a2200421 4500008004100000022001400041245009800055210006900153260001200222300001100234490000700245520196800252653001002220653000902230653001502239653002402254653003002278653003602308653002702344653002102371653003102392653001102423653001102434653000902445653002402454653001602478653001702494653002202511653002802533100002502561700001602586700001902602700002002621700002202641700002102663700002402684856004802708 2014 eng d a1741-255200aA practical, intuitive brain-computer interface for communicating 'yes' or 'no' by listening.0 apractical intuitive braincomputer interface for communicating ye c06/2014 a0350030 v113 aOBJECTIVE: Previous work has shown that it is possible to build an EEG-based binary brain-computer interface system (BCI) driven purely by shifts of attention to auditory stimuli. However, previous studies used abrupt, abstract stimuli that are often perceived as harsh and unpleasant, and whose lack of inherent meaning may make the interface unintuitive and difficult for beginners. We aimed to establish whether we could transition to a system based on more natural, intuitive stimuli (spoken words 'yes' and 'no') without loss of performance, and whether the system could be used by people in the locked-in state. APPROACH: We performed a counterbalanced, interleaved within-subject comparison between an auditory streaming BCI that used beep stimuli, and one that used word stimuli. Fourteen healthy volunteers performed two sessions each, on separate days. We also collected preliminary data from two subjects with advanced amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), who used the word-based system to answer a set of simple yes-no questions. MAIN RESULTS: The N1, N2 and P3 event-related potentials elicited by words varied more between subjects than those elicited by beeps. However, the difference between responses to attended and unattended stimuli was more consistent with words than beeps. Healthy subjects' performance with word stimuli (mean 77% ± 3.3 s.e.) was slightly but not significantly better than their performance with beep stimuli (mean 73% ± 2.8 s.e.). The two subjects with ALS used the word-based BCI to answer questions with a level of accuracy similar to that of the healthy subjects. SIGNIFICANCE: Since performance using word stimuli was at least as good as performance using beeps, we recommend that auditory streaming BCI systems be built with word stimuli to make the system more pleasant and intuitive. Our preliminary data show that word-based streaming BCI is a promising tool for communication by people who are locked in.10aAdult10aAged10aAlgorithms10aAuditory Perception10abrain-computer interfaces10aCommunication Aids for Disabled10aElectroencephalography10aEquipment Design10aEquipment Failure Analysis10aFemale10aHumans10aMale10aMan-Machine Systems10aMiddle Aged10aQuadriplegia10aTreatment Outcome10aUser-Computer Interface1 aHill, Jeremy, Jeremy1 aRicci, Erin1 aHaider, Sameah1 aMcCane, Lynn, M1 aHeckman, Susan, M1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aVaughan, Theresa, M uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2483827802062nas a2200241 4500008004100000022001400041245012200055210006900177260001200246300001100258490000600269520128800275653002801563100002001591700002601611700002401637700002101661700002401682700002301706700002201729700002101751856004801772 2012 eng d a1741-255200aEEG correlates of P300-based brain-computer interface (BCI) performance in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.0 aEEG correlates of P300based braincomputer interface BCI performa c04/2012 a0260140 v93 aThe purpose of this study was to identify electroencephalography (EEG) features that correlate with P300-based brain-computer interface (P300 BCI) performance in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Twenty people with ALS used a P300 BCI spelling application in copy-spelling mode. Three types of EEG features were found to be good predictors of P300 BCI performance: (1) the root-mean-square amplitude and (2) the negative peak amplitude of the event-related potential to target stimuli (target ERP) at Fz, Cz, P3, Pz, and P4; and (3) EEG theta frequency (4.5-8 Hz) power at Fz, Cz, P3, Pz, P4, PO7, PO8 and Oz. A statistical prediction model that used a subset of these features accounted for >60% of the variance in copy-spelling performance (p < 0.001, mean R(2)?= 0.6175). The correlations reflected between-subject, rather than within-subject, effects. The results enhance understanding of performance differences among P300 BCI users. The predictors found in this study might help in: (1) identifying suitable candidates for long-term P300 BCI operation; (2) assessing performance online. Further work on within-subject effects needs to be done to establish whether P300 BCI user performance could be improved by optimizing one or more of these EEG features.10aUser-Computer Interface1 aMak, Joseph, N.1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aMcCane, Lynn, M.1 aTsui, Phillippa, Z.1 aZeitlin, Debra, J.1 aSellers, Eric, W.1 aWolpaw, Jonathan uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2235050102447nas a2200229 4500008004100000022001400041245007700055210006700132260001200199300001400211490000800225520176000233653002901993653002002022653000902042100002602051700002602077700002102103700002402124700002102148856004802169 2011 eng d a1872-895200aThe P300-based brain-computer interface (BCI): effects of stimulus rate.0 aP300based braincomputer interface BCI effects of stimulus rate c04/2011 a731–7370 v1223 aOBJECTIVE: Brain-computer interface technology can restore communication and control to people who are severely paralyzed. We have developed a non-invasive BCI based on the P300 event-related potential that uses an 8×9 matrix of 72 items that flash in groups of 6. Stimulus presentation rate (i.e., flash rate) is one of several parameters that could affect the speed and accuracy of performance. We studied performance (i.e., accuracy and characters/min) on copy spelling as a function of flash rate. METHODS: In the first study of six BCI users, stimulus-on and stimulus-off times were equal and flash rate was 4, 8, 16, or 32 Hz. In the second study of five BCI users, flash rate was varied by changing either the stimulus-on or stimulus-off time. RESULTS: For all users, lower flash rates gave higher accuracy. The flash rate that gave the highest characters/min varied across users, ranging from 8 to 32 Hz. However, variations in stimulus-on and stimulus-off times did not themselves significantly affect accuracy. Providing feedback did not affect results in either study suggesting that offline analyses should readily generalize to online performance. However there do appear to be session-specific effects that can influence the generalizability of classifier results. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that stimulus presentation (i.e., flash) rate affects the accuracy and speed of P300 BCI performance. SIGNIFICANCE: These results extend the range over which slower flash rates increase the amplitude of the P300. Considering also presentation time, the optimal rate differs among users, and thus should be set empirically for each user. Optimal flash rate might also vary with other parameters such as the number of items in the matrix.10abrain-computer interface10aneuroprosthesis10aP3001 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aSarnacki, William, A.1 aTownsend, George1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aWolpaw, Jonathan uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2106797000539nas a2200157 4500008004100000022001400041245010700055210006900162260001200231300001100243490000600254653002800260100002400288700002100312856004800333 2011 eng d a1741-255200aSpecial issue containing contributions from the Fourth International Brain-Computer Interface Meeting.0 aSpecial issue containing contributions from the Fourth Internati c04/2011 a0202010 v810aUser-Computer Interface1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aWolpaw, Jonathan uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2143652201801nas a2200181 4500008004100000022001400041245006700055210006200122260001200184300001400196490000700210520125900217653002801476100002201504700002401526700002101550856004801571 2010 eng d a1471-180X00aA brain-computer interface for long-term independent home use.0 abraincomputer interface for longterm independent home use c10/2010 a449–4550 v113 aOur objective was to develop and validate a new brain-computer interface (BCI) system suitable for long-term independent home use by people with severe motor disabilities. The BCI was used by a 51-year-old male with ALS who could no longer use conventional assistive devices. Caregivers learned to place the electrode cap, add electrode gel, and turn on the BCI. After calibration, the system allowed the user to communicate via EEG. Re-calibration was performed remotely (via the internet), and BCI accuracy assessed in periodic tests. Reports of BCI usefulness by the user and the family were also recorded. Results showed that BCI accuracy remained at 83% (r = -.07, n.s.) for over 2.5 years (1.4% expected by chance). The BCI user and his family state that the BCI had restored his independence in social interactions and at work. He uses the BCI to run his NIH-funded research laboratory and to communicate via e-mail with family, friends, and colleagues. In addition to this first user, several other similarly disabled people are now using the BCI in their daily lives. In conclusion, long-term independent home use of this BCI system is practical for severely disabled people, and can contribute significantly to quality of life and productivity.10aUser-Computer Interface1 aSellers, Eric, W.1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aWolpaw, Jonathan uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2058394702444nas a2200325 4500008004100000022001400041245011200055210006900167260001200236300001600248490000800264520147000272653002901742653002801771653000801799653002801807653000901835653001901844100001701863700002001880700002501900700002301925700001701948700001901965700002101984700002402005700002102029700002002050856004802070 2010 eng d a1872-895200aA novel P300-based brain-computer interface stimulus presentation paradigm: moving beyond rows and columns.0 anovel P300based braincomputer interface stimulus presentation pa c07/2010 a1109–11200 v1213 aOBJECTIVE: An electroencephalographic brain-computer interface (BCI) can provide a non-muscular means of communication for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) or other neuromuscular disorders. We present a novel P300-based BCI stimulus presentation - the checkerboard paradigm (CBP). CBP performance is compared to that of the standard row/column paradigm (RCP) introduced by Farwell and Donchin (1988). METHODS: Using an 8x9 matrix of alphanumeric characters and keyboard commands, 18 participants used the CBP and RCP in counter-balanced fashion. With approximately 9-12 min of calibration data, we used a stepwise linear discriminant analysis for online classification of subsequent data. RESULTS: Mean online accuracy was significantly higher for the CBP, 92%, than for the RCP, 77%. Correcting for extra selections due to errors, mean bit rate was also significantly higher for the CBP, 23 bits/min, than for the RCP, 17 bits/min. Moreover, the two paradigms produced significantly different waveforms. Initial tests with three advanced ALS participants produced similar results. Furthermore, these individuals preferred the CBP to the RCP. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the CBP is markedly superior to the RCP in performance and user acceptability. SIGNIFICANCE: The CBP has the potential to provide a substantially more effective BCI than the RCP. This is especially important for people with severe neuromuscular disabilities.10abrain-computer interface10abrain-machine interface10aEEG10aevent-related potential10aP30010aRehabilitation1 aTownsend, G.1 aLaPallo, B., K.1 aBoulay, Chadwick, B.1 aKrusienski, D., J.1 aFrye, G., E.1 aHauser, C., K.1 aSchwartz, N., E.1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aSellers, E., W. uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2034738701741nas a2200253 4500008004100000022001400041245008200055210006900137260001200206300001400218490000700232520097500239653000801214653002901222653002201251653002401273100003201297700002601329700002001355700002401375700001901399700002101418856004801439 2009 eng d a1873-624600aA scanning protocol for a sensorimotor rhythm-based brain-computer interface.0 ascanning protocol for a sensorimotor rhythmbased braincomputer i c02/2009 a169–1750 v803 aThe scanning protocol is a novel brain-computer interface (BCI) implementation that can be controlled with sensorimotor rhythms (SMRs) of the electroencephalogram (EEG). The user views a screen that shows four choices in a linear array with one marked as target. The four choices are successively highlighted for 2.5s each. When a target is highlighted, the user can select it by modulating the SMR. An advantage of this method is the capacity to choose among multiple choices with just one learned SMR modulation. Each of 10 naive users trained for ten 30 min sessions over 5 weeks. User performance improved significantly (p<0.001) over the sessions and ranged from 30 to 80% mean accuracy of the last three sessions (chance accuracy=25%). The incidence of correct selections depended on the target position. These results suggest that, with further improvements, a scanning protocol can be effective. The ultimate goal is to expand it to a large matrix of selections.10aBCI10abrain-computer interface10ascanning protocol10asensorimotor rhythm1 aFriedrich, Elisabeth, V. C.1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aNeuper, Christa1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aBrunner, Peter1 aWolpaw, Jonathan uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1878660302473nas a2200289 4500008004100000022001400041245007500055210006900130260001200199300001600211490000800227520163800235653002901873653002801902653000801930653002801938653000901966653001901975100002101994700002402015700001902039700002102058700002102079700001502100700002002115856004802135 2009 eng d a1872-895200aToward a high-throughput auditory P300-based brain-computer interface.0 aToward a highthroughput auditory P300based braincomputer interfa c07/2009 a1252–12610 v1203 aOBJECTIVE: Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology can provide severely disabled people with non-muscular communication. For those most severely disabled, limitations in eye mobility or visual acuity may necessitate auditory BCI systems. The present study investigates the efficacy of the use of six environmental sounds to operate a 6x6 P300 Speller. METHODS: A two-group design was used to ascertain whether participants benefited from visual cues early in training. Group A (N=5) received only auditory stimuli during all 11 sessions, whereas Group AV (N=5) received simultaneous auditory and visual stimuli in initial sessions after which the visual stimuli were systematically removed. Stepwise linear discriminant analysis determined the matrix item that elicited the largest P300 response and thereby identified the desired choice. RESULTS: Online results and offline analyses showed that the two groups achieved equivalent accuracy. In the last session, eight of 10 participants achieved 50% or more, and four of these achieved 75% or more, online accuracy (2.8% accuracy expected by chance). Mean bit rates averaged about 2 bits/min, and maximum bit rates reached 5.6 bits/min. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that an auditory P300 BCI is feasible, that reasonable classification accuracy and rate of communication are achievable, and that the paradigm should be further evaluated with a group of severely disabled participants who have limited visual mobility. SIGNIFICANCE: With further development, this auditory P300 BCI could be of substantial value to severely disabled people who cannot use a visual BCI.10abrain-computer interface10abrain-machine interface10aEEG10aevent-related potential10aP30010aRehabilitation1 aKlobassa, D., S.1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aBrunner, Peter1 aSchwartz, N., E.1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aNeuper, C.1 aSellers, E., W. uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1957409102392nas a2200361 4500008004100000022001400041245008900055210006900144260001200213300001600225490000800241520135100249653003401600653002901634653002501663653002901688653000901717653001901726100001601745700002001761700001701781700001901798700001301817700001901830700001401849700001501863700002301878700002401901700002101925700002101946700001501967856004801982 2008 eng d a1388-245700aA P300-based brain-computer interface for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.0 aP300based braincomputer interface for people with amyotrophic la c08/2008 a1909–19160 v1193 aOBJECTIVE: The current study evaluates the efficacy of a P300-based brain-computer interface (BCI) communication device for individuals with advanced ALS. METHODS: Participants attended to one cell of a N x N matrix while the N rows and N columns flashed randomly. Each cell of the matrix contained one character. Every flash of an attended character served as a rare event in an oddball sequence and elicited a P300 response. Classification coefficients derived using a stepwise linear discriminant function were applied to the data after each set of flashes. The character receiving the highest discriminant score was presented as feedback. RESULTS: In Phase I, six participants used a 6 x 6 matrix on 12 separate days with a mean rate of 1.2 selections/min and mean online and offline accuracies of 62% and 82%, respectively. In Phase II, four participants used either a 6 x 6 or a 7 x 7 matrix to produce novel and spontaneous statements with a mean online rate of 2.1 selections/min and online accuracy of 79%. The amplitude and latency of the P300 remained stable over 40 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Participants could communicate with the P300-based BCI and performance was stable over many months. SIGNIFICANCE: BCIs could provide an alternative communication and control technology in the daily lives of people severely disabled by ALS.10aAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis10abrain-computer interface10aelectroencephalogram10aevent-related potentials10aP30010aRehabilitation1 aNijboer, F.1 aSellers, E., W.1 aMellinger, J1 aJordan, M., A.1 aMatuz, T1 aFurdea, Adrian1 aHalder, S1 aMochty, U.1 aKrusienski, D., J.1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aBirbaumer, Niels1 aKübler, A uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1857198401649nas a2200241 4500008004100000022001400041245004600055210004500101260001200146300001200158490000800170520095000178653002901128653002901157653001701186653004201203100002301245700002001268700002601288700002401314700002101338856004801359 2008 eng d a0165-027000aToward enhanced P300 speller performance.0 aToward enhanced P300 speller performance c01/2008 a15–210 v1673 aThis study examines the effects of expanding the classical P300 feature space on the classification performance of data collected from a P300 speller paradigm [Farwell LA, Donchin E. Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1988;70:510-23]. Using stepwise linear discriminant analysis (SWLDA) to construct a classifier, the effects of spatial channel selection, channel referencing, data decimation, and maximum number of model features are compared with the intent of establishing a baseline not only for the SWLDA classifier, but for related P300 speller classification methods in general. By supplementing the classical P300 recording locations with posterior locations, online classification performance of P300 speller responses can be significantly improved using SWLDA and the favorable parameters derived from the offline comparative analysis.10abrain-computer interface10aevent related potentials10aP300 speller10astepwise linear discriminant analysis1 aKrusienski, D., J.1 aSellers, E., W.1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aWolpaw, Jonathan uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1782277701626nas a2200229 4500008004100000022001400041245006800055210006500123260001200188300001400200490000600214520094100220653002401161100002501185700002201210700002601232700001901258700002601277700002401303700002101327856004801348 2006 eng d a1741-256000aA comparison of classification techniques for the P300 Speller.0 acomparison of classification techniques for the P300 Speller c12/2006 a299–3050 v33 aThis study assesses the relative performance characteristics of five established classification techniques on data collected using the P300 Speller paradigm, originally described by Farwell and Donchin (1988 Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 70 510). Four linear methods: Pearson's correlation method (PCM), Fisher's linear discriminant (FLD), stepwise linear discriminant analysis (SWLDA) and a linear support vector machine (LSVM); and one nonlinear method: Gaussian kernel support vector machine (GSVM), are compared for classifying offline data from eight users. The relative performance of the classifiers is evaluated, along with the practical concerns regarding the implementation of the respective methods. The results indicate that while all methods attained acceptable performance levels, SWLDA and FLD provide the best overall performance and implementation characteristics for practical classification of P300 Speller data.10aNormal Distribution1 aKrusienski, Dean, J.1 aSellers, Eric, W.1 aCabestaing, François1 aBayoudh, Sabri1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aWolpaw, Jonathan uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1712433402016nas a2200265 4500008004100000022001400041245013800055210006900193260001200262300001400274490000700288520114400295653003401439653002901473653002501502653002901527653000901556653001901565100002201584700002501606700002601631700002401657700002101681856004801702 2006 eng d a0301-051100aA P300 event-related potential brain-computer interface (BCI): the effects of matrix size and inter stimulus interval on performance.0 aP300 eventrelated potential braincomputer interface BCI the effe c10/2006 a242–2520 v733 aWe describe a study designed to assess properties of a P300 brain-computer interface (BCI). The BCI presents the user with a matrix containing letters and numbers. The user attends to a character to be communicated and the rows and columns of the matrix briefly intensify. Each time the attended character is intensified it serves as a rare event in an oddball sequence and it elicits a P300 response. The BCI works by detecting which character elicited a P300 response. We manipulated the size of the character matrix (either 3 x 3 or 6 x 6) and the duration of the inter stimulus interval (ISI) between intensifications (either 175 or 350 ms). Online accuracy was highest for the 3 x 3 matrix 175-ms ISI condition, while bit rate was highest for the 6 x 6 matrix 175-ms ISI condition. Average accuracy in the best condition for each subject was 88%. P300 amplitude was significantly greater for the attended stimulus and for the 6 x 6 matrix. This work demonstrates that matrix size and ISI are important variables to consider when optimizing a BCI system for individual users and that a P300-BCI can be used for effective communication.10aAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis10abrain-computer interface10aelectroencephalogram10aevent-related potentials10aP30010aRehabilitation1 aSellers, Eric, W.1 aKrusienski, Dean, J.1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aWolpaw, Jonathan uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1686092001922nas a2200169 4500008004100000022001400041245009700055210006900152260001200221300001400233490000700247520137700254653002801631100002401659700002101683856004801704 2006 eng d a1534-432000aThe Third International Meeting on Brain-Computer Interface Technology: making a difference.0 aThird International Meeting on BrainComputer Interface Technolog c06/2006 a126–1270 v143 aThis special issue of the IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL SYSTEMS AND REHABILITATION ENGINEERING provides a representative and comprehensive bird's-eye view of the most recent developments in brain-computer interface (BCI) technology from laboratories around the world. The 30 research communications and papers are the direct outcome of the Third International Meeting on Brain-Computer Interface Technology held at the Rensselaerville Institute, Rensselaerville, NY, in June 2005. Fifty-three research groups from North and South America, Europe, and Asia, representing the majority of all the existing BCI laboratories around the world, participated in this highly focused meeting sponsored by the National Institutes of Health and organized by the BCI Laboratory of the Wadsworth Center of the New York State Department of Health. As demonstrated by the papers in this special issue, the rapid advances in BCI research and development make this technology capable of providing communication and control to people severely disabled by amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), brainstem stroke, cerebral palsy, and other neuromuscular disorders. Future work is expected to improve the performance and utility of BCIs, and to focus increasingly on making them a viable, practical, and affordable communication alternative for many thousands of severely disabled people worldwide.10aUser-Computer Interface1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aWolpaw, Jonathan uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1679227502977nas a2200361 4500008004100000022001400041245007400055210006800129260001200197300001100209490000700220520195300227653001202180653001002192653002702202653002202229653001102251653002702262653001302289653001302302653001602315653003102331653001702362653002802379100002402407700002602431700001902457700002502476700002402501700002102525700002102546856004802567 2006 eng d a1534-432000aThe Wadsworth BCI Research and Development Program: At Home with BCI.0 aWadsworth BCI Research and Development Program At Home with BCI c06/2006 a229-330 v143 a

The ultimate goal of brain-computer interface (BCI) technology is to provide communication and control capacities to people with severe motor disabilities. BCI research at the Wadsworth Center focuses primarily on noninvasive, electroencephalography (EEG)-based BCI methods. We have shown that people, including those with severe motor disabilities, can learn to use sensorimotor rhythms (SMRs) to move a cursor rapidly and accurately in one or two dimensions. We have also improved P300-based BCI operation. We are now translating this laboratory-proven BCI technology into a system that can be used by severely disabled people in their homes with minimal ongoing technical oversight. To accomplish this, we have: improved our general-purpose BCI software (BCI2000); improved online adaptation and feature translation for SMR-based BCI operation; improved the accuracy and bandwidth of P300-based BCI operation; reduced the complexity of system hardware and software and begun to evaluate home system use in appropriate users. These developments have resulted in prototype systems for every day use in people's homes.

10aAnimals10aBrain10aElectroencephalography10aEvoked Potentials10aHumans10aNeuromuscular Diseases10aNew York10aResearch10aSwitzerland10aTherapy, Computer-Assisted10aUniversities10aUser-Computer Interface1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aSarnacki, William, A1 aKrusienski, Dean, J1 aSellers, Eric, W1 aWolpaw, Jonathan uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1679230103537nas a2200253 4500008004100000022001400041245009500055210006900150260001200219300001200231490000800243520277200251653002903023653000803052653002703060653001303087653001403100653002403114100002603138700002603164700002403190700002103214856004803235 2005 eng d a1388-245700aBrain-computer interface (BCI) operation: signal and noise during early training sessions.0 aBraincomputer interface BCI operation signal and noise during ea c01/2005 a56–620 v1163 aOBJECTIVE: People can learn to control mu (8-12 Hz) or beta (18-25 Hz) rhythm amplitude in the electroencephalogram (EEG) recorded over sensorimotor cortex and use it to move a cursor to a target on a video screen. The recorded signal may also contain electromyogram (EMG) and other non-EEG artifacts. This study examines the presence and characteristics of EMG contamination during new users' initial brain-computer interface (BCI) training sessions, as they first attempt to acquire control over mu or beta rhythm amplitude and to use that control to move a cursor to a target. METHODS: In the standard one-dimensional format, a target appears along the right edge of the screen and 1s later the cursor appears in the middle of the left edge and moves across the screen at a fixed rate with its vertical movement controlled by a linear function of mu or beta rhythm amplitude. In the basic two-choice version, the target occupies the upper or lower half of the right edge. The user's task is to move the cursor vertically so that it hits the target when it reaches the right edge. The present data comprise the first 10 sessions of BCI training from each of 7 users. Their data were selected to illustrate the variations seen in EMG contamination across users. RESULTS: Five of the 7 users learned to change rhythm amplitude appropriately, so that the cursor hit the target. Three of these 5 showed no evidence of EMG contamination. In the other two of these 5, EMG was prominent in early sessions, and tended to be associated with errors rather than with hits. As EEG control improved over the 10 sessions, this EMG contamination disappeared. In the remaining two users, who never acquired actual EEG control, EMG was prominent in initial sessions and tended to move the cursor to the target. This EMG contamination was still detectable by Session 10. CONCLUSIONS: EMG contamination arising from cranial muscles is often present early in BCI training and gradually wanes. In those users who eventually acquire EEG control, early target-related EMG contamination may be most prominent for unsuccessful trials, and may reflect user frustration. In those users who never acquire EEG control, EMG may initially serve to move the cursor toward the target. Careful and comprehensive topographical and spectral analyses throughout user training are essential for detecting EMG contamination and differentiating between cursor control provided by EEG control and cursor control provided by EMG contamination. SIGNIFICANCE: Artifacts such as EMG are common in EEG recordings. Comprehensive spectral and topographical analyses are necessary to detect them and ensure that they do not masquerade as, or interfere with acquisition of, actual EEG-based cursor control.10abrain-computer interface10aEEG10aElectroencephalography10aLearning10amu rhythm10asensorimotor cortex1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aSarnacki, William, A.1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aWolpaw, Jonathan uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1558918402332nas a2200457 4500008004100000022001400041245009000055210006900145260001200214300001100226490000700237520103300244653000901277653003401286653002701320653002901347653003701376653001101413653001101424653001601435653000901451653001601460653001701476653001301493653001401506653002301520653002801543653002501571653002201596653002801618100001501646700001501661700002301676700002401699700001601723700001901739700002601758700002101784700002101805856004801826 2005 eng d a1526-632X00aPatients with ALS can use sensorimotor rhythms to operate a brain-computer interface.0 aPatients with ALS can use sensorimotor rhythms to operate a brai c05/2005 a1775-70 v643 a

People with severe motor disabilities can maintain an acceptable quality of life if they can communicate. Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), which do not depend on muscle control, can provide communication. Four people severely disabled by ALS learned to operate a BCI with EEG rhythms recorded over sensorimotor cortex. These results suggest that a sensorimotor rhythm-based BCI could help maintain quality of life for people with ALS.

10aAged10aAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis10aElectroencephalography10aEvoked Potentials, Motor10aEvoked Potentials, Somatosensory10aFemale10aHumans10aImagination10aMale10aMiddle Aged10aMotor Cortex10aMovement10aParalysis10aPhotic Stimulation10aProstheses and Implants10aSomatosensory Cortex10aTreatment Outcome10aUser-Computer Interface1 aKübler, A1 aNijboer, F1 aMellinger, Jürgen1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aPawelzik, H1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aBirbaumer, Niels1 aWolpaw, Jonathan uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1591180901195nas a2200253 4500008004100000022001400041245009000055210006900145260001200214300001600226490000700242520044000249653002800689100001500717700001600732700001700748700002400765700001700789700001900806700002600825700002100851700002100872856004800893 2005 eng d a1526-632X00aPatients with ALS can use sensorimotor rhythms to operate a brain-computer interface.0 aPatients with ALS can use sensorimotor rhythms to operate a brai c05/2005 a1775–17770 v643 aPeople with severe motor disabilities can maintain an acceptable quality of life if they can communicate. Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), which do not depend on muscle control, can provide communication. Four people severely disabled by ALS learned to operate a BCI with EEG rhythms recorded over sensorimotor cortex. These results suggest that a sensorimotor rhythm-based BCI could help maintain quality of life for people with ALS.10aUser-Computer Interface1 aKübler, A1 aNijboer, F.1 aMellinger, J1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aPawelzik, H.1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aBirbaumer, Niels1 aWolpaw, Jonathan uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1591180902685nas a2200433 4500008004100000022001400041245011000055210006900165260001200234300001600246490000700262520140200269653003101671653000801702653001601710653002901726653000801755653000801763653002801771653003601799653001401835653000901849653001901858653003201877653002901909100002401938700002601962700001901988700002402007700001902031700002102050700002002071700002002091700002402111700002402135700002302159700002102182856004802203 2004 eng d a0018-929400aThe BCI Competition 2003: progress and perspectives in detection and discrimination of EEG single trials.0 aBCI Competition 2003 progress and perspectives in detection and  c06/2004 a1044–10510 v513 aInterest in developing a new method of man-to-machine communication–a brain-computer interface (BCI)–has grown steadily over the past few decades. BCIs create a new communication channel between the brain and an output device by bypassing conventional motor output pathways of nerves and muscles. These systems use signals recorded from the scalp, the surface of the cortex, or from inside the brain to enable users to control a variety of applications including simple word-processing software and orthotics. BCI technology could therefore provide a new communication and control option for individuals who cannot otherwise express their wishes to the outside world. Signal processing and classification methods are essential tools in the development of improved BCI technology. We organized the BCI Competition 2003 to evaluate the current state of the art of these tools. Four laboratories well versed in EEG-based BCI research provided six data sets in a documented format. We made these data sets (i.e., labeled training sets and unlabeled test sets) and their descriptions available on the Internet. The goal in the competition was to maximize the performance measure for the test labels. Researchers worldwide tested their algorithms and competed for the best classification results. This paper describes the six data sets and the results and function of the most successful algorithms.10aaugmentative communication10aBCI10abeta-rhythm10abrain-computer interface10aEEG10aERP10aimagined hand movements10alateralized readiness potential10amu-rhythm10aP30010aRehabilitation10asingle-trial classification10aslow cortical potentials1 aBlankertz, Benjamin1 aMüller, Klaus-Robert1 aCurio, Gabriel1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aSchlögl, Alois1 aNeuper, Christa1 aPfurtscheller, Gert1 aHinterberger, Thilo1 aSchröder, Michael1 aBirbaumer, Niels uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1518887602760nas a2200433 4500008004100000022001400041245011000055210006900165260001200234300001200246490000700258520140000265653001001665653001501675653003401690653002801724653001001752653001401762653002301776653002701799653002201826653001101848653003101859653003201890653002801922100002401950700002601974700001902000700002402019700001902043700002102062700002002083700002002103700002402123700002002147700002302167700002102190856011502211 2004 eng d a0018-929400aThe BCI Competition 2003: Progress and perspectives in detection and discrimination of EEG single trials.0 aBCI Competition 2003 Progress and perspectives in detection and  c06/2004 a1044-510 v513 aInterest in developing a new method of man-to-machine communication--a brain-computer interface (BCI)--has grown steadily over the past few decades. BCIs create a new communication channel between the brain and an output device by bypassing conventional motor output pathways of nerves and muscles. These systems use signals recorded from the scalp, the surface of the cortex, or from inside the brain to enable users to control a variety of applications including simple word-processing software and orthotics. BCI technology could therefore provide a new communication and control option for individuals who cannot otherwise express their wishes to the outside world. Signal processing and classification methods are essential tools in the development of improved BCI technology. We organized the BCI Competition 2003 to evaluate the current state of the art of these tools. Four laboratories well versed in EEG-based BCI research provided six data sets in a documented format. We made these data sets (i.e., labeled training sets and unlabeled test sets) and their descriptions available on the Internet. The goal in the competition was to maximize the performance measure for the test labels. Researchers worldwide tested their algorithms and competed for the best classification results. This paper describes the six data sets and the results and function of the most successful algorithms.10aAdult10aAlgorithms10aAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis10aArtificial Intelligence10aBrain10aCognition10aDatabases, Factual10aElectroencephalography10aEvoked Potentials10aHumans10aReproducibility of Results10aSensitivity and Specificity10aUser-Computer Interface1 aBlankertz, Benjamin1 aMüller, Klaus-Robert1 aCurio, Gabriel1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aSchlögl, Alois1 aNeuper, Christa1 aPfurtscheller, Gert1 aHinterberger, T1 aSchröder, Michael1 aBirbaumer, Niels uhttps://www.neurotechcenter.org/publications/2004/bci-competition-2003-progress-and-perspectives-detection-and00690nas a2200181 4500008004100000245009300041210006900134100002300203700001500226700001600241700001900257700002600276700002400302700002100326700002100347700001500368856012500383 2004 eng d00aP300 for communication: Evidence from patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).0 aP300 for communication Evidence from patients with amyotrophic l1 aMellinger, Jürgen1 aNijboer, F1 aPawelzik, H1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aBirbaumer, Niels1 aKuebler, A uhttps://www.neurotechcenter.org/publications/2004/p300-communication-evidence-patients-amyotrophic-lateral-sclerosis-als02907nas a2200325 4500008004100000022001400041245008700055210006900142260001200211300001300223490000700236520189600243653003102139653003502170653003302205653001902238100002402257700002702281700002302308700002302331700002202354700002202376700002002398700002202418700002102440700002102461700003002482700002102512856004802533 2003 eng d a1534-432000aBrain-computer interface technology: a review of the Second International Meeting.0 aBraincomputer interface technology a review of the Second Intern c06/2003 a94–1090 v113 aThis paper summarizes the Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control, The Second International Meeting, held in Rensselaerville, NY, in June 2002. Sponsored by the National Institutes of Health and organized by the Wadsworth Center of the New York State Department of Health, the meeting addressed current work and future plans in brain-computer interface (BCI) research. Ninety-two researchers representing 38 different research groups from the United States, Canada, Europe, and China participated. The BCIs discussed at the meeting use electroencephalographic activity recorded from the scalp or single-neuron activity recorded within cortex to control cursor movement, select letters or icons, or operate neuroprostheses. The central element in each BCI is a translation algorithm that converts electrophysiological input from the user into output that controls external devices. BCI operation depends on effective interaction between two adaptive controllers, the user who encodes his or her commands in the electrophysiological input provided to the BCI, and the BCI that recognizes the commands contained in the input and expresses them in device control. Current BCIs have maximum information transfer rates of up to 25 b/min. Achievement of greater speed and accuracy requires improvements in signal acquisition and processing, in translation algorithms, and in user training. These improvements depend on interdisciplinary cooperation among neuroscientists, engineers, computer programmers, psychologists, and rehabilitation specialists, and on adoption and widespread application of objective criteria for evaluating alternative methods. The practical use of BCI technology will be determined by the development of appropriate applications and identification of appropriate user groups, and will require careful attention to the needs and desires of individual users.10aaugmentative communication10aBrain-computer interface (BCI)10aelectroencephalography (EEG)10aRehabilitation1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aHeetderks, William, J.1 aTrejo, Leonard, J.1 aRymer, William, Z.1 aWeinrich, Michael1 aMoore, Melody, M.1 aKübler, Andrea1 aDobkin, Bruce, H.1 aBirbaumer, Niels1 aDonchin, Emanuel1 aWolpaw, Elizabeth, Winter1 aWolpaw, Jonathan uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1289924702517nas a2200241 4500008004100000022001400041245007400055210006900129260001200198300001600210490000800226520179400234653001302028653002902041653002502070653001902095653001902114100002302133700002602156700002402182700002102206856004802227 2003 eng d a1388-245700aEMG contamination of EEG: spectral and topographical characteristics.0 aEMG contamination of EEG spectral and topographical characterist c09/2003 a1580–15930 v1143 aOBJECTIVE: Electromyogram (EMG) contamination is often a problem in electroencephalogram (EEG) recording, particularly, for those applications such as EEG-based brain-computer interfaces that rely on automated measurements of EEG features. As an essential prelude to developing methods for recognizing and eliminating EMG contamination of EEG, this study defines the spectral and topographical characteristics of frontalis and temporalis muscle EMG over the entire scalp. It describes both average data and the range of individual differences. METHODS: In 25 healthy adults, signals from 64 scalp and 4 facial locations were recorded during relaxation and during defined (15, 30, or 70% of maximum) contractions of frontalis or temporalis muscles. RESULTS: In the average data, EMG had a broad frequency distribution from 0 to >200 Hz. Amplitude was greatest at 20-30 Hz frontally and 40-80 Hz temporally. Temporalis spectra also showed a smaller peak around 20 Hz. These spectral components attenuated and broadened centrally. Even with weak (15%) contraction, EMG was detectable (P<0.001) near the vertex at frequencies >12 Hz in the average data and >8 Hz in some individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Frontalis or temporalis muscle EMG recorded from the scalp has spectral and topographical features that vary substantially across individuals. EMG spectra often have peaks in the beta frequency range that resemble EEG beta peaks. SIGNIFICANCE: While EMG contamination is greatest at the periphery of the scalp near the active muscles, even weak contractions can produce EMG that obscures or mimics EEG alpha, mu, or beta rhythms over the entire scalp. Recognition and elimination of this contamination is likely to require recording from an appropriate set of peripheral scalp locations.10aartifact10abrain-computer interface10aelectroencephalogram10aelectromyogram10aRehabilitation1 aGoncharova, I., I.1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aWolpaw, Jonathan uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1294878703064nas a2200373 4500008004100000022001400041245009000055210006900145260001200214300001000226490000700236520200500243653002902248653001002277653001502287653001402302653001002316653001802326653002702344653003002371653001302401653001102414653001602425653002802441653001302469653002002482653002802502653002202530100002102552700002602573700002402599700001902623856004802642 2003 eng d a1534-432000aThe Wadsworth Center brain-computer interface (BCI) research and development program.0 aWadsworth Center braincomputer interface BCI research and develo c06/2003 a204-70 v113 a

Brain-computer interface (BCI) research at the Wadsworth Center has focused primarily on using electroencephalogram (EEG) rhythms recorded from the scalp over sensorimotor cortex to control cursor movement in one or two dimensions. Recent and current studies seek to improve the speed and accuracy of this control by improving the selection of signal features and their translation into device commands, by incorporating additional signal features, and by optimizing the adaptive interaction between the user and system. In addition, to facilitate the evaluation, comparison, and combination of alternative BCI methods, we have developed a general-purpose BCI system called BCI-2000 and have made it available to other research groups. Finally, in collaboration with several other groups, we are developing simple BCI applications and are testing their practicality and long-term value for people with severe motor disabilities.

10aAcademic Medical Centers10aAdult10aAlgorithms10aArtifacts10aBrain10aBrain Mapping10aElectroencephalography10aEvoked Potentials, Visual10aFeedback10aHumans10aMiddle Aged10aNervous System Diseases10aResearch10aResearch Design10aUser-Computer Interface10aVisual Perception1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aSchalk, Gerwin uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1289927506596nas a2200265 4500008004100000022001400041245006100055210005900116260001200175300001100187490000800198520581800206653001906024653003606043653002106079653002706100653001106127653002806138100002106166700002106187700002606208700002406234700002406258856004806282 2002 eng d a1388-245700aBrain-computer interfaces for communication and control.0 aBraincomputer interfaces for communication and control c06/2002 a767-910 v1133 a

For many years people have speculated that electroencephalographic activity or other electrophysiological measures of brain function might provide a new non-muscular channel for sending messages and commands to the external world - a brain-computer interface (BCI). Over the past 15 years, productive BCI research programs have arisen. Encouraged by new understanding of brain function, by the advent of powerful low-cost computer equipment, and by growing recognition of the needs and potentials of people with disabilities, these programs concentrate on developing new augmentative communication and controltechnology for those with severe neuromuscular disorders, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, brainstem stroke, and spinal cord injury. The immediate goal is to provide these users, who may be completely paralyzed, or 'locked in', with basic communication capabilities so that they can express their wishes to caregivers or even operate word processing programs or neuroprostheses. Present-day BCIs determine the intent of the user from a variety of different electrophysiological signals. These signals include slow cortical potentials, P300 potentials, and mu or beta rhythms recorded from the scalp, and cortical neuronal activity recorded by implanted electrodes. They are translated in real-time into commands that operate a computer display or other device. Successful operation requires that the user encode commands in these signals and that the BCI derive the commands from the signals. Thus, the user and the BCI system need to adapt to each other both initially and continually so as to ensure stable performance. Current BCIs have maximum information transfer rates up to 10-25bits/min. This limited capacity can be valuable for people whose severe disabilities prevent them from using conventional augmentative communication methods. At the same time, many possible applications of BCI technology, such as neuroprosthesis control, may require higher information transfer rates. Future progress will depend on: recognition that BCI research and development is an interdisciplinary problem, involving neurobiology, psychology, engineering, mathematics, and computer science; identification of those signals, whether evoked potentials, spontaneous rhythms, or neuronal firing rates, that users are best able to control independent of activity in conventional motor output pathways; development of training methods for helping users to gain and maintain that control; delineation of the best algorithms for translating these signals into device commands; attention to the identification and elimination of artifacts such as electromyographic and electro-oculographic activity; adoption of precise and objective procedures for evaluating BCI performance; recognition of the need for long-term as well as short-term assessment of BCI performance; identification of appropriate BCI applications and appropriate matching of applications and users; and attention to factors that affect user acceptance of augmentative technology, including ease of use, cosmesis, and provision of those communication and control capacities that are most important to the user. Development of BCI technology will also benefit from greater emphasis on peer-reviewed research publications and avoidance of the hyperbolic and often misleading media attention that tends to generate unrealistic expectations in the public and skepticism in other researchers. With adequate recognition and effective engagement of all these issues, BCI systems could eventually provide an important new communication and control option for those with motor disabilities and might also give those without disabilities a supplementary control channel or a control channel useful in special circumstances.

10aBrain Diseases10aCommunication Aids for Disabled10aComputer Systems10aElectroencephalography10aHumans10aUser-Computer Interface1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aBirbaumer, Niels1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aPfurtscheller, Gert1 aVaughan, Theresa, M uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1204803801157nas a2200181 4500008004100000022001400041245006300055210006100118260001200179300001400191490000600205520061700211653002800828100002100856700002600877700002400903856004800927 2000 eng d a1063-652800aBrain-computer interface research at the Wadsworth Center.0 aBraincomputer interface research at the Wadsworth Center c06/2000 a222–2260 v83 aStudies at the Wadsworth Center over the past 14 years have shown that people with or without motor disabilities can learn to control the amplitude of mu or beta rhythms in electroencephalographic (EEG) activity recorded from the scalp over sensorimotor cortex and can use that control to move a cursor on a computer screen in one or two dimensions. This EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI) could provide a new augmentative communication technology for those who are totally paralyzed or have other severe motor impairments. Present research focuses on improving the speed and accuracy of BCI communication.10aUser-Computer Interface1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aVaughan, Theresa, M uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1089619402866nas a2200289 4500008004100000022001400041245008600055210006900141260001200210300001400222490000600236520197100242653003102213653003502244653003302279100002102312700002102333700002202354700002602376700002002402700001902422700002102441700002102462700002102483700002402504856004802528 2000 eng d a1063-652800aBrain-computer interface technology: a review of the first international meeting.0 aBraincomputer interface technology a review of the first interna c06/2000 a164–1730 v83 aOver the past decade, many laboratories have begun to explore brain-computer interface (BCI) technology as a radically new communication option for those with neuromuscular impairments that prevent them from using conventional augmentative communication methods. BCI's provide these users with communication channels that do not depend on peripheral nerves and muscles. This article summarizes the first international meeting devoted to BCI research and development. Current BCI's use electroencephalographic (EEG) activity recorded at the scalp or single-unit activity recorded from within cortex to control cursor movement, select letters or icons, or operate a neuroprosthesis. The central element in each BCI is a translation algorithm that converts electrophysiological input from the user into output that controls external devices. BCI operation depends on effective interaction between two adaptive controllers, the user who encodes his or her commands in the electrophysiological input provided to the BCI, and the BCI which recognizes the commands contained in the input and expresses them in device control. Current BCI's have maximum information transfer rates of 5-25 b/min. Achievement of greater speed and accuracy depends on improvements in signal processing, translation algorithms, and user training. These improvements depend on increased interdisciplinary cooperation between neuroscientists, engineers, computer programmers, psychologists, and rehabilitation specialists, and on adoption and widespread application of objective methods for evaluating alternative methods. The practical use of BCI technology depends on the development of appropriate applications, identification of appropriate user groups, and careful attention to the needs and desires of individual users. BCI research and development will also benefit from greater emphasis on peer-reviewed publications, and from adoption of standard venues for presentations and discussion.10aaugmentative communication10aBrain-computer interface (BCI)10aelectroencephalography (EEG)1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aBirbaumer, Niels1 aHeetderks, W., J.1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aPeckham, P., H.1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aDonchin, Emanuel1 aQuatrano, L., A.1 aRobinson, C., J.1 aVaughan, Theresa, M uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1089617803091nas a2200373 4500008004100000022001400041245008600055210006900141260001200210300001100222490000600233520197800239653001502217653002002232653003602252653002102288653002702309653002202336653001102358653002702369653004102396653002802437100002102465700002102486700001902507700002602526700001702552700001902569700002102588700001802609700001802627700002402645856004802669 2000 eng d a1063-652800aBrain-computer interface technology: a review of the first international meeting.0 aBraincomputer interface technology a review of the first interna c06/2000 a164-730 v83 a

Over the past decade, many laboratories have begun to explore brain-computer interface (BCI) technology as a radically new communication option for those with neuromuscular impairments that prevent them from using conventional augmentative communication methods. BCI's provide these users with communication channels that do not depend on peripheral nerves and muscles. This article summarizes the first international meeting devoted to BCI research and development. Current BCI's use electroencephalographic (EEG) activity recorded at the scalp or single-unit activity recorded from within cortex to control cursor movement, select letters or icons, or operate a neuroprosthesis. The central element in each BCI is a translation algorithm that converts electrophysiological input from the user into output that controls external devices. BCI operation depends on effective interaction between two adaptive controllers, the user who encodes his or her commands in the electrophysiological input provided to the BCI, and the BCI which recognizes the commands contained in the input and expresses them in device control. Current BCI's have maximum information transfer rates of 5-25 b/min. Achievement of greater speed and accuracy depends on improvements in signal processing, translation algorithms, and user training. These improvements depend on increased interdisciplinary cooperation between neuroscientists, engineers, computer programmers, psychologists, and rehabilitation specialists, and on adoption and widespread application of objective methods for evaluating alternative methods. The practical use of BCI technology depends on the development of appropriate applications, identification of appropriate user groups, and careful attention to the needs and desires of individual users. BCI research and development will also benefit from greater emphasis on peer-reviewed publications, and from adoption of standard venues for presentations and discussion.

10aAlgorithms10aCerebral Cortex10aCommunication Aids for Disabled10aDisabled Persons10aElectroencephalography10aEvoked Potentials10aHumans10aNeuromuscular Diseases10aSignal Processing, Computer-Assisted10aUser-Computer Interface1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aBirbaumer, Niels1 aHeetderks, W J1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aPeckham, P H1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aDonchin, Emanuel1 aQuatrano, L A1 aRobinson, C J1 aVaughan, Theresa, M uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1089617802265nas a2200241 4500008004100000022001400041245007900055210006900134260001200203300001400215490000700229520157600236653001601812653000801828653001201836653001401848653002401862100002601886700001801912700002401930700002101954856004801975 2000 eng d a0896-026700aMu and beta rhythm topographies during motor imagery and actual movements.0 aMu and beta rhythm topographies during motor imagery and actual  c03/2000 a177–1860 v123 aPeople can learn to control the 8-12 Hz mu rhythm and/or the 18-25 Hz beta rhythm in the EEG recorded over sensorimotor cortex and use it to control a cursor on a video screen. Subjects often report using motor imagery to control cursor movement, particularly early in training. We compared in untrained subjects the EEG topographies associated with actual hand movement to those associated with imagined hand movement. Sixty-four EEG channels were recorded while each of 33 adults moved left- or right-hand or imagined doing so. Frequency-specific differences between movement or imagery and rest, and between right- and left-hand movement or imagery, were evaluated by scalp topographies of voltage and r spectra, and principal component analysis. Both movement and imagery were associated with mu and beta rhythm desynchronization. The mu topographies showed bilateral foci of desynchronization over sensorimotor cortices, while the beta topographies showed peak desynchronization over the vertex. Both mu and beta rhythm left/right differences showed bilateral central foci that were stronger on the right side. The independence of mu and beta rhythms was demonstrated by differences for movement and imagery for the subjects as a group and by principal components analysis. The results indicated that the effects of imagery were not simply an attenuated version of the effects of movement. They supply evidence that motor imagery could play an important role in EEG-based communication, and suggest that mu and beta rhythms might provide independent control signals.10abeta rhythm10aEEG10aimagery10amu rhythm10asensorimotor cortex1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aMiner, L., A.1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aWolpaw, Jonathan uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1079168102088nas a2200265 4500008004100000022001400041245006600055210006300121260001200184300001400196490000800210520131500218653003101533653001701564653002701581653002101608653001401629653001901643653002401662100002401686700001801710700002601728700002101754856004701775 1998 eng d a0013-469400aEEG-based communication: analysis of concurrent EMG activity.0 aEEGbased communication analysis of concurrent EMG activity c12/1998 a428–4330 v1073 aOBJECTIVE: Recent studies indicate that people can learn to control the amplitude of mu or beta rhythms in the EEG recorded from the scalp over sensorimotor cortex and can use that control to move a cursor to targets on the computer screen. While subjects do not move during performance, it is possible that inapparent or unconscious muscle contractions contribute to the changes in the mu and beta rhythm activity responsible for cursor movement. We evaluated this possibility. METHODS: EMG was recorded from 10 distal limb muscle groups while five trained subjects used mu or beta rhythms to move a cursor to targets at the bottom or top edge of a computer screen. RESULTS: EMG activity was very low during performance, averaging 4.0+/-4.4% (SD) of maximum voluntary contraction. Most important, the correlation, measured as r2, between target position and EMG activity averaged only 0.01+/-0.02, much lower than the correlation between target position and the EEG activity that controlled cursor movement, which averaged 0.39+/-0.18. CONCLUSIONS: These results strongly support the conclusion that EEG-based cursor control does no depend on concurrent muscle activity. EEG-based communication and control might provide a new augmentative communication option for those with severe motor disabilities.10aaugmentative communication10aconditioning10aElectroencephalography10aElectromyography10amu rhythm10aRehabilitation10asensorimotor cortex1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aMiner, L., A.1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aWolpaw, Jonathan uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/992208901454nas a2200181 4500008004100000022001400041245005300055210005000108260001200158300001400170490000600184520094700190653002201137100002401159700002101183700002101204856004701225 1996 eng d a1063-652800aEEG-based communication: prospects and problems.0 aEEGbased communication prospects and problems c12/1996 a425–4300 v43 aCurrent rehabilitation engineering combines new prosthetic methods with recent developments in personal computers to provide alternative communication and control channels to individuals with motor impairments. Despite these advances, all commercially available systems still require some measure of voluntary motor control. Thus, these systems are not useful for individuals who are totally paralyzed. Electroencephalographic (EEG) activity may provide the basis for a system that would completely bypass normal motor output. EEG-based communication technology might provide assistive devices for individuals who have little or no reliable motor function. This paper reviews the prospects for and problems of EEG-based communication. It summarizes current approaches to development of this new technology, describes the major problems that must be resolved, and focuses on issues critical for its use by those with severe motor disabilities.10aVisual Perception1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aDonchin, Emanuel uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8973969