02599nas a2200289   4500008004100000022001400041245013200055210006900187260001200256300001800268490000700286520174900293653001702042653002102059653001502080653001102095653001702106653001602123100001302139700001302152700001302165700001702178700002402195700002102219700002102240856004802261       2010                        eng d  a1529-240100aH-reflex up-conditioning encourages recovery of EMG activity and H-reflexes after sciatic nerve transection and repair in rats.0 aHreflex upconditioning encourages recovery of EMG activity and H  c12/2010  a16128–161360 v303 aOperant conditioning of the spinal stretch reflex or its electrical analog, the H-reflex, produces spinal cord plasticity and can thereby affect motoneuron responses to primary afferent input. To explore whether this conditioning can affect the functional outcome after peripheral nerve injury, we assessed the effect of up-conditioning soleus (SOL) H-reflex on SOL and tibialis anterior (TA) function after sciatic nerve transection and repair. Sprague Dawley rats were implanted with EMG electrodes in SOL and TA and stimulating cuffs on the posterior tibial nerve. After control data collection, the sciatic nerve was transected and repaired and the rat was exposed for 120 d to continued control data collection (TC rats) or SOL H-reflex up-conditioning (TU rats). At the end of data collection, motoneurons that had reinnervated SOL and TA were labeled retrogradely. Putative primary afferent terminals [i.e., terminals containing vesicular glutamate transporter-1 (VGLUT1)] on SOL motoneurons were studied immunohistochemically. SOL (and probably TA) background EMG activity recovered faster in TU rats than in TC rats, and the final recovered SOL H-reflex was significantly larger in TU than in TC rats. TU and TC rats had significantly fewer labeled motoneurons and higher proportions of double-labeled motoneurons than untransected rats. VGLUT1 terminals were significantly more numerous on SOL motoneurons of TU than TC rats. Combined with the larger H-reflexes in TU rats, this anatomical finding supports the hypothesis that SOL H-reflex up-conditioning strengthened primary afferent reinnervation of SOL motoneurons. These results suggest that H-reflex up-conditioning may improve functional recovery after nerve injury and repair.10aconditioning10aperipheral nerve10aplasticity10aReflex10aregeneration10aSpinal Cord1 aChen, Yi1 aWang, Yu1 aChen, Lu1 aSun, Chenyou1 aEnglish, Arthur, W.1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aChen, Xiang Yang  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2112355902087nas a2200205   4500008004100000022001400041245010700055210006900162260001200231300001600243490000700259520144800266653001701714100002401731700001301755700002301768700002101791700002101812856004801833       2007                        eng d  a0022-307700aRecovery of electromyographic activity after transection and surgical repair of the rat sciatic nerve.0 aRecovery of electromyographic activity after transection and sur  c02/2007  a1127–11340 v973 aThe recovery of soleus (SOL), gastrocnemius (GAS), and tibialis anterior (TA) electromyographic activity (EMG) after transection and surgical repair of the sciatic nerve was studied in Sprague-Dawley rats using chronically implanted stimulation and recording electrodes. Spontaneous EMG activity in SOL and GAS and direct muscle (M) responses to posterior tibial nerve stimulation persisted for < or =2 days after sciatic nerve transection, but SOL and GAS H-reflexes disappeared immediately. Spontaneous EMG activity began to return 2-3 wk after transection, rose nearly to pretransection levels by 60 days, and persisted for the duration of the study period (120 days). Recovery of stimulus-evoked EMG responses began about 30 days after sciatic nerve transection as multiple small responses with a wide range of latencies. Over time, the latencies of these fractionated responses shortened, their amplitudes increased, and they merged into a distinct short-latency component (the putative M response) and a distinct long-latency component (the putative H-reflex). The extent of recovery of stimulation-evoked EMG was modest: even 100 days after sciatic nerve transection, the responses were still much smaller than those before transection. Similar gradual development of responses to posterior tibial nerve stimulation was also seen in TA, suggesting that some regenerating fibers sent branches into both tibial and common peroneal nerves.10aTibial Nerve1 aEnglish, Arthur, W.1 aChen, Yi1 aCarp, Jonathan, S.1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aChen, Xiang Yang  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17122310