02427nas a2200349 4500008004100000022001400041245011100055210006900166260001200235300001100247490000700258520132200265653001501587653002801602653003001630653003701660653002701697653002901724653001101753653001601764653001701780653001301797653003501810653003101845653003201876653004101908653002901949100001201978700001301990700002602003856004802029 2014 eng d a1558-021000aAdaptive spatio-temporal filtering for movement related potentials in EEG-based brain-computer interfaces.0 aAdaptive spatiotemporal filtering for movement related potential c07/2014 a847-570 v223 aMovement related potentials (MRPs) are used as features in many brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) based on electroencephalogram (EEG). MRP feature extraction is challenging since EEG is noisy and varies between subjects. Previous studies used spatial and spatio-temporal filtering methods to deal with these problems. However, they did not optimize temporal information or may have been susceptible to overfitting when training data are limited and the feature space is of high dimension. Furthermore, most of these studies manually select data windows and low-pass frequencies. We propose an adaptive spatio-temporal (AST) filtering method to model MRPs more accurately in lower dimensional space. AST automatically optimizes all parameters by employing a Gaussian kernel to construct a low-pass time-frequency filter and a linear ridge regression (LRR) algorithm to compute a spatial filter. Optimal parameters are simultaneously sought by minimizing leave-one-out cross-validation error through gradient descent. Using four BCI datasets from 12 individuals, we compare the performances of AST filter to two popular methods: the discriminant spatial pattern filter and regularized spatio-temporal filter. The results demonstrate that our AST filter can make more accurate predictions and is computationally feasible.10aAlgorithms10aArtificial Intelligence10abrain-computer interfaces10aData Interpretation, Statistical10aElectroencephalography10aEvoked Potentials, Motor10aHumans10aImagination10aMotor Cortex10aMovement10aPattern Recognition, Automated10aReproducibility of Results10aSensitivity and Specificity10aSignal Processing, Computer-Assisted10aSpatio-Temporal Analysis1 aLu, Jun1 aXie, Kan1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J. uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2472363202099nas a2200241 4500008004100000022001400041245011200055210006900167260001200236300001000248490000700258520136500265653001501630653001001645653002701655653001101682653001701693653002801710100002401738700002601762700002101788856004801809 2012 eng d a1873-274700aValue of amplitude, phase, and coherence features for a sensorimotor rhythm-based brain-computer interface.0 aValue of amplitude phase and coherence features for a sensorimot c01/2012 a130-40 v873 aMeasures that quantify the relationship between two or more brain signals are drawing attention as neuroscientists explore the mechanisms of large-scale integration that enable coherent behavior and cognition. Traditional Fourier-based measures of coherence have been used to quantify frequency-dependent relationships between two signals. More recently, several off-line studies examined phase-locking value (PLV) as a possible feature for use in brain-computer interface (BCI) systems. However, only a few individuals have been studied and full statistical comparisons among the different classes of features and their combinations have not been conducted. The present study examines the relative BCI performance of spectral power, coherence, and PLV, alone and in combination. The results indicate that spectral power produced classification at least as good as PLV, coherence, or any possible combination of these measures. This may be due to the fact that all three measures reflect mainly the activity of a single signal source (i.e., an area of sensorimotor cortex). This possibility is supported by the finding that EEG signals from different channels generally had near-zero phase differences. Coherence, PLV, and other measures of inter-channel relationships may be more valuable for BCIs that use signals from more than one distinct cortical source.10aAlgorithms10aBrain10aElectroencephalography10aHumans10aMotor Cortex10aUser-Computer Interface1 aKrusienski, Dean, J1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aWolpaw, Jonathan uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2198598402332nas a2200457 4500008004100000022001400041245009000055210006900145260001200214300001100226490000700237520103300244653000901277653003401286653002701320653002901347653003701376653001101413653001101424653001601435653000901451653001601460653001701476653001301493653001401506653002301520653002801543653002501571653002201596653002801618100001501646700001501661700002301676700002401699700001601723700001901739700002601758700002101784700002101805856004801826 2005 eng d a1526-632X00aPatients with ALS can use sensorimotor rhythms to operate a brain-computer interface.0 aPatients with ALS can use sensorimotor rhythms to operate a brai c05/2005 a1775-70 v643 a

People with severe motor disabilities can maintain an acceptable quality of life if they can communicate. Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), which do not depend on muscle control, can provide communication. Four people severely disabled by ALS learned to operate a BCI with EEG rhythms recorded over sensorimotor cortex. These results suggest that a sensorimotor rhythm-based BCI could help maintain quality of life for people with ALS.

10aAged10aAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis10aElectroencephalography10aEvoked Potentials, Motor10aEvoked Potentials, Somatosensory10aFemale10aHumans10aImagination10aMale10aMiddle Aged10aMotor Cortex10aMovement10aParalysis10aPhotic Stimulation10aProstheses and Implants10aSomatosensory Cortex10aTreatment Outcome10aUser-Computer Interface1 aKübler, A1 aNijboer, F1 aMellinger, Jürgen1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aPawelzik, H1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aBirbaumer, Niels1 aWolpaw, Jonathan uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15911809