02668nas a2200241   4500008004100000022001400041245009000055210006900145260001200214300001100226490000700237520188700244653002802131653003502159653003402194653003102228653004102259653001902300100001202319700002602331700002102357856004802378       2013                        eng d  a1741-255200aAdaptive Laplacian filtering for sensorimotor rhythm-based brain-computer interfaces.0 aAdaptive Laplacian filtering for sensorimotor rhythmbased brainc  c02/2013  a0160020 v103 aOBJECTIVE:
Sensorimotor rhythms (SMRs) are 8-30 Hz oscillations in the electroencephalogram (EEG) recorded from the scalp over sensorimotor cortex that change with movement and/or movement imagery. Many brain-computer interface (BCI) studies have shown that people can learn to control SMR amplitudes and can use that control to move cursors and other objects in one, two or three dimensions. At the same time, if SMR-based BCIs are to be useful for people with neuromuscular disabilities, their accuracy and reliability must be improved substantially. These BCIs often use spatial filtering methods such as common average reference (CAR), Laplacian (LAP) filter or common spatial pattern (CSP) filter to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio of EEG. Here, we test the hypothesis that a new filter design, called an 'adaptive Laplacian (ALAP) filter', can provide better performance for SMR-based BCIs.
APPROACH:
An ALAP filter employs a Gaussian kernel to construct a smooth spatial gradient of channel weights and then simultaneously seeks the optimal kernel radius of this spatial filter and the regularization parameter of linear ridge regression. This optimization is based on minimizing the leave-one-out cross-validation error through a gradient descent method and is computationally feasible.
MAIN RESULTS:
Using a variety of kinds of BCI data from a total of 22 individuals, we compare the performances of ALAP filter to CAR, small LAP, large LAP and CSP filters. With a large number of channels and limited data, ALAP performs significantly better than CSP, CAR, small LAP and large LAP both in classification accuracy and in mean-squared error. Using fewer channels restricted to motor areas, ALAP is still superior to CAR, small LAP and large LAP, but equally matched to CSP.
SIGNIFICANCE:
Thus, ALAP may help to improve the accuracy and robustness of SMR-based BCIs.10aassistive communication10abrain computer interface (BCI)10abrain-machine interface (BMI)10aelectroencephalogram (EEG)10aleave-one-out (LOO) cross-validation10aspatial filter1 aLu, Jun1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aWolpaw, Jonathan  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2322087902193nas a2200265   4500008004100000022001400041245005800055210005600113260001200169300001400181490000800195520144100203653002801644653002701672653001401699653002501713653001501738653001901753653002401772100002601796700001901822700001801841700002101859856004701880       1997                        eng d  a0013-469400aSpatial filter selection for EEG-based communication.0 aSpatial filter selection for EEGbased communication  c09/1997  a386–3940 v1033 aIndividuals can learn to control the amplitude of mu-rhythm activity in the EEG recorded over sensorimotor cortex and use it to move a cursor to a target on a video screen. The speed and accuracy of cursor movement depend on the consistency of the control signal and on the signal-to-noise ratio achieved by the spatial and temporal filtering methods that extract the activity prior to its translation into cursor movement. The present study compared alternative spatial filtering methods. Sixty-four channel EEG data collected while well-trained subjects were moving the cursor to targets at the top or bottom edge of a video screen were analyzed offline by four different spatial filters, namely a standard ear-reference, a common average reference (CAR), a small Laplacian (3 cm to set of surrounding electrodes) and a large Laplacian (6 cm to set of surrounding electrodes). The CAR and large Laplacian methods proved best able to distinguish between top and bottom targets. They were significantly superior to the ear-reference method. The difference in performance between the large Laplacian and small Laplacian methods presumably indicated that the former was better matched to the topographical extent of the EEG control signal. The results as a whole demonstrate the importance of proper spatial filter selection for maximizing the signal-to-noise ratio and thereby improving the speed and accuracy of EEG-based communication.10aassistive communication10aElectroencephalography10amu rhythm10aoperant conditioning10aprosthesis10aRehabilitation10asensorimotor cortex1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aMcCane, L., M.1 aDavid, S., V.1 aWolpaw, Jonathan  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/930528702490nas a2200265   4500008004100000022001400041245004000055210003800095260001200133300001400145490000700159520177200166653002801938653002701966653001401993653002502007653001502032653001902047653002402066100002102090700001902111700002102130700002602151856004702177       1997                        eng d  a0736-025800aTiming of EEG-based cursor control.0 aTiming of EEGbased cursor control  c11/1997  a529–5380 v143 aRecent studies show that humans can learn to control the amplitude of electroencephalography (EEG) activity in specific frequency bands over sensorimotor cortex and use it to move a cursor to a target on a computer screen. EEG-based communication could be a valuable new communication and control option for those with severe motor disabilities. Realization of this potential requires detailed knowledge of the characteristic features of EEG control. This study examined the course of EEG control after presentation of a target. At the beginning of each trial, a target appeared at the top or bottom edge of the subject's video screen and 1 sec later a cursor began to move vertically as a function of EEG amplitude in a specific frequency band. In well-trained subjects, this amplitude was high at the time the target appeared and then either remained high (i.e., for a top target) or fell rapidly (i.e., for a bottom target). Target-specific EEG amplitude control began 0.5 sec after the target appeared and appeared to wax and wane with a period of approximately 1 sec until the cursor reached the target (i.e., a hit) or the opposite edge of the screen (i.e., a miss). Accuracy was 90% or greater for each subject. Top-target errors usually occurred later in the trial because of failure to reach and/or maintain sufficiently high amplitude, whereas bottom-target errors usually occurred immediately because of failure to reduce an initially high amplitude quickly enough. The results suggest modifications that could improve performance. These include lengthening the intertrial period, shortening the delay between target appearance and cursor movement, and including time within the trial as a variable in the equation that translates EEG into cursor movement.10aassistive communication10aElectroencephalography10amu rhythm10aoperant conditioning10aprosthesis10aRehabilitation10asensorimotor cortex1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aFlotzinger, D.1 aPfurtscheller, G1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/945806001539nas a2200241   4500008004100000022001400041245005700055210005400112260001200166300001400178490000700192520085200199653002801051653002701079653001401106653002501120653001501145653001901160653002401179100002101203700002601224856004701250       1994                        eng d  a0013-469400aMultichannel EEG-based brain-computer communication.0 aMultichannel EEGbased braincomputer communication  c06/1994  a444–4490 v903 aIndividuals who are paralyzed or have other severe movement disorders often need alternative means for communicating with and controlling their environments. In this study, human subjects learned to use two channels of bipolar EEG activity to control 2-dimensional movement of a cursor on a computer screen. Amplitudes of 8-12 Hz activity in the EEG recorded from the scalp across right and left central sulci were determined by fast Fourier transform and combined to control vertical and horizontal cursor movements simultaneously. This independent control of two separate EEG channels cannot be attributed to a non-specific change in brain activity and appeared to be specific to the mu rhythm frequency range. With further development, multichannel EEG-based communication may prove of significant value to those with severe motor disabilities.10aassistive communication10aElectroencephalography10amu rhythm10aoperant conditioning10aprosthesis10aRehabilitation10asensorimotor cortex1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7515787