02753nas a2200373 4500008004100000022001400041245011800055210006900173260001200242300001100254490000800265520163200273653001001905653001501915653001701930653002001947653001501967653002501982653001102007653001702018653001102035653000902046653001602055653001402071653002802085653001802113653001602131100003202147700002102179700001902200700001902219700001902238856012202257 2021 eng d a1095-957200aWithin-subject reaction time variability: Role of cortical networks and underlying neurophysiological mechanisms.0 aWithinsubject reaction time variability Role of cortical network c08/2021 a1181270 v2373 a

Variations in reaction time are a ubiquitous characteristic of human behavior. Extensively documented, they have been successfully modeled using parameters of the subject or the task, but the neural basis of behavioral reaction time that varies within the same subject and the same task has been minimally studied. In this paper, we investigate behavioral reaction time variance using 28 datasets of direct cortical recordings in humans who engaged in four different types of simple sensory-motor reaction time tasks. Using a previously described technique that can identify the onset of population-level cortical activity and a novel functional connectivity algorithm described herein, we show that the cumulative latency difference of population-level neural activity across the task-related cortical network can explain up to 41% of the trial-by-trial variance in reaction time. Furthermore, we show that reaction time variance may primarily be due to the latencies in specific brain regions and demonstrate that behavioral latency variance is accumulated across the whole task-related cortical network. Our results suggest that population-level neural activity monotonically increases prior to movement execution, and that trial-by-trial changes in that increase are, in part, accounted for by inhibitory activity indexed by low-frequency oscillations. This pre-movement neural activity explains 19% of the measured variance in neural latencies in our data. Thus, our study provides a mechanistic explanation for a sizable fraction of behavioral reaction time when the subject's task is the same from trial to trial.

10aAdult10aAlgorithms10aAlpha Rhythm10aCerebral Cortex10aConnectome10aElectrocorticography10aFemale10aGamma Rhythm10aHumans10aMale10aMiddle Aged10aNerve Net10aPsychomotor Performance10aReaction Time10aYoung Adult1 aParaskevopoulou, Sivylla, E1 aCoon, William, G1 aBrunner, Peter1 aMiller, Kai, J1 aSchalk, Gerwin uhttps://www.neurotechcenter.org/publications/2021/within-subject-reaction-time-variability-role-cortical-networks-and05137nas a2200373 4500008004100000022001400041245007500055210006900130260001200199300001000211490000800221520406800229653001004297653001504307653001004322653001804332653002404350653002704374653001104401653000904412653002404421653002404445653001904469653003604488653004104524653002404565653002804589100001904617700001904636700002404655700001504679700002104694856004804715 2008 eng d a0165-027000aBrain-computer interfaces (BCIs): Detection Instead of Classification.0 aBraincomputer interfaces BCIs Detection Instead of Classificatio c01/2008 a51-620 v1673 a

Many studies over the past two decades have shown that people can use brain signals to convey their intent to a computer through brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). These devices operate by recording signals from the brain and translating these signals into device commands. They can be used by people who are severely paralyzed to communicate without any use of muscle activity. One of the major impediments in translating this novel technology into clinical applications is the current requirement for preliminary analyses to identify the brain signal features best suited for communication. This paper introduces and validates signal detection, which does not require such analysis procedures, as a new concept in BCI signal processing. This detection concept is realized with Gaussian mixture models (GMMs) that are used to model resting brain activity so that any change in relevant brain signals can be detected. It is implemented in a package called SIGFRIED (SIGnal modeling For Real-time Identification and Event Detection). The results indicate that SIGFRIED produces results that are within the range of those achieved using a common analysis strategy that requires preliminary identification of signal features. They indicate that such laborious analysis procedures could be replaced by merely recording brain signals during rest. In summary, this paper demonstrates how SIGFRIED could be used to overcome one of the present impediments to translation of laboratory BCI demonstrations into clinically practical applications.

10aAdult10aAlgorithms10aBrain10aBrain Mapping10aElectrocardiography10aElectroencephalography10aHumans10aMale10aMan-Machine Systems10aNormal Distribution10aOnline Systems10aSignal Detection, Psychological10aSignal Processing, Computer-Assisted10aSoftware Validation10aUser-Computer Interface1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aBrunner, Peter1 aGerhardt, Lester, A1 aBischof, H1 aWolpaw, Jonathan uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1792013403145nas a2200373 4500008004100000022001400041245005700055210005400112260001200166300001000178490000700188520212100195653001002316653001502326653001802341653002102359653003302380653002702413653001302440653002202453653001102475653001102486653000902497653003502506653003102541653003202572100001902604700001902623700001902642700001702661700002402678700002102702856004802723 2008 eng d a1095-957200aReal-time detection of event-related brain activity.0 aRealtime detection of eventrelated brain activity c11/2008 a245-90 v433 a

The complexity and inter-individual variation of brain signals impedes real-time detection of events in raw signals. To convert these complex signals into results that can be readily understood, current approaches usually apply statistical methods to data from known conditions after all data have been collected. The capability to provide meaningful visualization of complex brain signals without the requirement to initially collect data from all conditions would provide a new tool, essentially a new imaging technique, that would open up new avenues for the study of brain function. Here we show that a new analysis approach, called SIGFRIED, can overcome this serious limitation of current methods. SIGFRIED can visualize brain signal changes without requiring prior data collection from all conditions. This capacity is particularly well suited to applications in which comprehensive prior data collection is impossible or impractical, such as intraoperative localization of cortical function or detection of epileptic seizures.

10aAdult10aAlgorithms10aBrain Mapping10aComputer Systems10aDiagnosis, Computer-Assisted10aElectroencephalography10aEpilepsy10aEvoked Potentials10aFemale10aHumans10aMale10aPattern Recognition, Automated10aReproducibility of Results10aSensitivity and Specificity1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aLeuthardt, E C1 aBrunner, Peter1 aOjemann, J G1 aGerhardt, Lester, A1 aWolpaw, Jonathan uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18718544