03382nas a2200349 4500008004100000022001400041245008900055210006900144260001200213300001100225490000700236520236800243653002202611653001502633653001202648653003502660653001602695653002402711653002602735653002102761653004002782653002702822653001002849653002502859653002002884100001702904700001902921700001402940700001702954700001402971856004702985 1997 eng d a0090-696400aTechnical features of a CCD video camera system to record cardiac fluorescence data.0 aTechnical features of a CCD video camera system to record cardia c07/1997 a713-250 v253 a

A charge-coupled device (CCD) camera was used to acquire movies of transmembrane activity from thin slices of sheep ventricular epicardial muscle stained with a voltage-sensitive dye. Compared with photodiodes, CCDs have high spatial resolution, but low temporal resolution. Spatial resolution in our system ranged from 0.04 to 0.14 mm/pixel; the acquisition rate was 60, 120, or 240 frames/sec. Propagating waves were readily visualized after subtraction of a background image. The optical signal had an amplitude of 1 to 6 gray levels, with signal-to-noise ratios between 1.5 and 4.4. Because CCD cameras integrate light over the frame interval, moving objects, including propagating waves, are blurred in the resulting movies. A computer model of such an integrating imaging system was developed to study the effects of blur, noise, filtering, and quantization on the ability to measure conduction velocity and action potential duration (APD). The model indicated that blurring, filtering, and quantization do not affect the ability to localize wave fronts in the optical data (i.e., no systematic error in determining spatial position), but noise does increase the uncertainty of the measurements. The model also showed that the low frame rates of the CCD camera introduced a systematic error in the calculation of APD: for cutoff levels > 50%, the APD was erroneously long. Both noise and quantization increased the uncertainty in the APD measurements. The optical measures of conduction velocity were not significantly different from those measured simultaneously with microelectrodes. Optical APDs, however, were longer than the electrically recorded APDs. This APD error could be reduced by using the 50% cutoff level and the fastest frame rate possible.

10aAction Potentials10aAlgorithms10aAnimals10aBody Surface Potential Mapping10aCalibration10aComputer Simulation10aElectric Conductivity10aFluorescent Dyes10aImage Processing, Computer-Assisted10aModels, Cardiovascular10aSheep10aVentricular Function10aVideo Recording1 aBaxter, Bill1 aDavidenko, J M1 aLoew, L M1 aWuskell, J P1 aJalife, J uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9236983