02704nas a2200241   4500008004100000022001400041245009000055210006900145260001200214300001400226490000700240520199800247653003402245653001302279653001102292653001802303653001602321100002202337700001302359700002102372700002102393856004802414       2008                        eng d  a1460-956800aEffects of H-reflex up-conditioning on GABAergic terminals on rat soleus motoneurons.0 aEffects of Hreflex upconditioning on GABAergic terminals on rat   c08/2008  a668–6740 v283 aTo explore the role of spinal cord plasticity in motor learning, we evaluated the effects of H-reflex operant conditioning on GABAergic input to rat spinal motoneurons. Previous work indicated that down-conditioning of soleus H-reflex increases GABAergic input to soleus motoneurons. This study explored the effect of H-reflex up-conditioning on GABAergic input. Of nine rats exposed to H-reflex up-conditioning, up-conditioning was successful (H-reflex increase >or= 20%) in seven and failed (change < 20%) in two. These rats and eight naive control (i.e. unconditioned) rats were injected with cholera toxin subunit B-conjugated Alexa fluor 488 into the soleus muscle to retrogradely label soleus motoneurons. Sections containing soleus motoneurons were processed for GAD(67) [one of the two principal forms of the GABA-synthesizing enzyme glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD)] with an ABC-peroxidase system. Two blinded independent raters counted and measured GABAergic terminals on these motoneurons. Unlike successful down-conditioning, which greatly increased the number of identifiable GABAergic terminals on the motoneurons, up-conditioning did not significantly change GABAergic terminal number. Successful up-conditioning did produce slight but statistically significant increases in GABAergic terminal diameter and soma coverage. These results are consistent with other data indicating that up- and down-conditioning are not mirror images of each other, but rather have different mechanisms. Although the marked changes in GABAergic terminals with down-conditioning probably contribute to H-reflex decrease, the modest changes in GABAergic terminals associated with up-conditioning may be compensatory or reactive plasticity, rather than the plasticity responsible for H-reflex increase. As a variety of spinal and supraspinal GABAergic neurons innervate motoneurons, the changes found with up-conditioning may be in terminals other than those affected in successful down-conditioning.10aactivity-dependent plasticity10aLearning10aMemory10aMotor control10aSpinal Cord1 aPillai, Shreejith1 aWang, Yu1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aChen, Xiang Yang  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18657184