@article {3386, title = {A practical, intuitive brain-computer interface for communicating {\textquoteright}yes{\textquoteright} or {\textquoteright}no{\textquoteright} by listening.}, journal = {J Neural Eng}, volume = {11}, year = {2014}, month = {06/2014}, pages = {035003}, abstract = {OBJECTIVE: Previous work has shown that it is possible to build an EEG-based binary brain-computer interface system (BCI) driven purely by shifts of attention to auditory stimuli. However, previous studies used abrupt, abstract stimuli that are often perceived as harsh and unpleasant, and whose lack of inherent meaning may make the interface unintuitive and difficult for beginners. We aimed to establish whether we could transition to a system based on more natural, intuitive stimuli (spoken words {\textquoteright}yes{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteright}no{\textquoteright}) without loss of performance, and whether the system could be used by people in the locked-in state. APPROACH: We performed a counterbalanced, interleaved within-subject comparison between an auditory streaming BCI that used beep stimuli, and one that used word stimuli. Fourteen healthy volunteers performed two sessions each, on separate days. We also collected preliminary data from two subjects with advanced amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), who used the word-based system to answer a set of simple yes-no questions. MAIN RESULTS: The N1, N2 and P3 event-related potentials elicited by words varied more between subjects than those elicited by beeps. However, the difference between responses to attended and unattended stimuli was more consistent with words than beeps. Healthy subjects{\textquoteright} performance with word stimuli (mean 77\% {\textpm} 3.3 s.e.) was slightly but not significantly better than their performance with beep stimuli (mean 73\% {\textpm} 2.8 s.e.). The two subjects with ALS used the word-based BCI to answer questions with a level of accuracy similar to that of the healthy subjects. SIGNIFICANCE: Since performance using word stimuli was at least as good as performance using beeps, we recommend that auditory streaming BCI systems be built with word stimuli to make the system more pleasant and intuitive. Our preliminary data show that word-based streaming BCI is a promising tool for communication by people who are locked in.}, keywords = {Adult, Aged, Algorithms, Auditory Perception, brain-computer interfaces, Communication Aids for Disabled, Electroencephalography, Equipment Design, Equipment Failure Analysis, Female, Humans, Male, Man-Machine Systems, Middle Aged, Quadriplegia, Treatment Outcome, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1741-2552}, doi = {10.1088/1741-2560/11/3/035003}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24838278}, author = {Jeremy Jeremy Hill and Ricci, Erin and Haider, Sameah and McCane, Lynn M and Susan M Heckman and Jonathan Wolpaw and Theresa M Vaughan} } @article {3087, title = {Brain-computer interfaces in medicine.}, journal = {Mayo Clinic proceedings. Mayo Clinic}, volume = {87}, year = {2012}, month = {03/2012}, pages = {268{\textendash}279}, abstract = {Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) acquire brain signals, analyze them, and translate them into commands that are relayed to output devices that carry out desired actions. BCIs do not use normal neuromuscular output pathways. The main goal of BCI is to replace or restore useful function to people disabled by neuromuscular disorders such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, cerebral palsy, stroke, or spinal cord injury. From initial demonstrations of electroencephalography-based spelling and single-neuron-based device control, researchers have gone on to use electroencephalographic, intracortical, electrocorticographic, and other brain signals for increasingly complex control of cursors, robotic arms, prostheses, wheelchairs, and other devices. Brain-computer interfaces may also prove useful for rehabilitation after stroke and for other disorders. In the future, they might augment the performance of surgeons or other medical professionals. Brain-computer interface technology is the focus of a rapidly growing research and development enterprise that is greatly exciting scientists, engineers, clinicians, and the public in general. Its future achievements will depend on advances in 3 crucial areas. Brain-computer interfaces need signal-acquisition hardware that is convenient, portable, safe, and able to function in all environments. Brain-computer interface systems need to be validated in long-term studies of real-world use by people with severe disabilities, and effective and viable models for their widespread dissemination must be implemented. Finally, the day-to-day and moment-to-moment reliability of BCI performance must be improved so that it approaches the reliability of natural muscle-based function.}, keywords = {User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1942-5546}, doi = {10.1016/j.mayocp.2011.12.008}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22325364}, author = {Shih, Jerry J. and Krusienski, Dean J. and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {3086, title = {EEG correlates of P300-based brain-computer interface (BCI) performance in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.}, journal = {Journal of neural engineering}, volume = {9}, year = {2012}, month = {04/2012}, pages = {026014}, abstract = {The purpose of this study was to identify electroencephalography (EEG) features that correlate with P300-based brain-computer interface (P300 BCI) performance in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Twenty people with ALS used a P300 BCI spelling application in copy-spelling mode. Three types of EEG features were found to be good predictors of P300 BCI performance: (1) the root-mean-square amplitude and (2) the negative peak amplitude of the event-related potential to target stimuli (target ERP) at Fz, Cz, P3, Pz, and P4; and (3) EEG theta frequency (4.5-8 Hz) power at Fz, Cz, P3, Pz, P4, PO7, PO8 and Oz. A statistical prediction model that used a subset of these features accounted for \>60\% of the variance in copy-spelling performance (p \< 0.001, mean R(2)?= 0.6175). The correlations reflected between-subject, rather than within-subject, effects. The results enhance understanding of performance differences among P300 BCI users. The predictors found in this study might help in: (1) identifying suitable candidates for long-term P300 BCI operation; (2) assessing performance online. Further work on within-subject effects needs to be done to establish whether P300 BCI user performance could be improved by optimizing one or more of these EEG features.}, keywords = {User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1741-2552}, doi = {10.1088/1741-2560/9/2/026014}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22350501}, author = {Mak, Joseph N. and Dennis J. McFarland and Theresa M Vaughan and McCane, Lynn M. and Tsui, Phillippa Z. and Zeitlin, Debra J. and Sellers, Eric W. and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {2149, title = {Silent Communication: toward using brain signals.}, journal = {IEEE Pulse}, volume = {3}, year = {2012}, month = {01/2012}, pages = {43-6}, abstract = {

From the 1980s movie Firefox to the more recent Avatar, popular science fiction has speculated about the possibility of a persons thoughts being read directly from his or her brain. Such braincomputer interfaces (BCIs) might allow people who are paralyzed to communicate with and control their environment, and there might also be applications in military situations wherever silent user-to-user communication is desirable. Previous studies have shown that BCI systems can use brain signals related to movements and movement imagery or attention-based character selection. Although these systems have successfully demonstrated the possibility to control devices using brain function, directly inferring which word a person intends to communicate has been elusive. A BCI using imagined speech might provide such a practical, intuitive device. Toward this goal, our studies to date addressed two scientific questions: (1) Can brain signals accurately characterize different aspects of speech? (2) Is it possible to predict spoken or imagined words or their components using brain signals?

}, keywords = {Animals, Brain, Brain Waves, Humans, Movement, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {2154-2287}, doi = {10.1109/MPUL.2011.2175637}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22344951}, author = {Pei, Xiao-Mei and Jeremy Jeremy Hill and Gerwin Schalk} } @article {3399, title = {Value of amplitude, phase, and coherence features for a sensorimotor rhythm-based brain-computer interface.}, journal = {Brain Res Bull}, volume = {87}, year = {2012}, month = {01/2012}, pages = {130-4}, abstract = {Measures that quantify the relationship between two or more brain signals are drawing attention as neuroscientists explore the mechanisms of large-scale integration that enable coherent behavior and cognition. Traditional Fourier-based measures of coherence have been used to quantify frequency-dependent relationships between two signals. More recently, several off-line studies examined phase-locking value (PLV) as a possible feature for use in brain-computer interface (BCI) systems. However, only a few individuals have been studied and full statistical comparisons among the different classes of features and their combinations have not been conducted. The present study examines the relative BCI performance of spectral power, coherence, and PLV, alone and in combination. The results indicate that spectral power produced classification at least as good as PLV, coherence, or any possible combination of these measures. This may be due to the fact that all three measures reflect mainly the activity of a single signal source (i.e., an area of sensorimotor cortex). This possibility is supported by the finding that EEG signals from different channels generally had near-zero phase differences. Coherence, PLV, and other measures of inter-channel relationships may be more valuable for BCIs that use signals from more than one distinct cortical source.}, keywords = {Algorithms, Brain, Electroencephalography, Humans, Motor Cortex, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1873-2747}, doi = {10.1016/j.brainresbull.2011.09.019}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21985984}, author = {Krusienski, Dean J and Dennis J. McFarland and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {2134, title = {Causal influence of gamma oscillations on the sensorimotor rhythm.}, journal = {Neuroimage}, volume = {56}, year = {2011}, month = {05/2011}, pages = {837-42}, abstract = {

Gamma oscillations of the electromagnetic field of the\ brain\ are known to be involved in a variety of cognitive processes, and are believed to be fundamental for information processing within the\ brain. While gamma oscillations have been shown to be correlated with\ brain\ rhythms at different frequencies, to date no empirical evidence has been presented that supports a causal influence of gamma oscillations on other\ brain\ rhythms. In this work, we study the relation of gamma oscillations and the sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) in healthy human subjects using electroencephalography. We first demonstrate that modulation of the SMR, induced by motor imagery of either the left or right hand, is positively correlated with the power of frontal and occipital gamma oscillations, and negatively correlated with the power of centro-parietal gamma oscillations. We then demonstrate that the most simple causal structure, capable of explaining the observed correlation of gamma oscillations and the SMR, entails a causal influence of gamma oscillations on the SMR. This finding supports the fundamental role attributed to gamma oscillations for information processing within the\ brain, and is of particular importance for\ brain-computer interfaces\ (BCIs). As modulation of the SMR is typically used in BCIs to infer a subject{\textquoteright}s intention, our findings entail that gamma oscillations have a causal influence on a subject{\textquoteright}s capability to utilize a\ BCI\ for means of communication.

}, keywords = {Adult, Cerebral Cortex, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Imagination, Male, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1095-9572}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.265}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20451626}, author = {Grosse-Wentrup, Moritz and Sch{\"o}lkopf, B and Jeremy Jeremy Hill} } @article {2132, title = {Closing the sensorimotor loop: haptic feedback facilitates decoding of motor imagery.}, journal = {J Neural Eng}, volume = {8}, year = {2011}, month = {06/2011}, pages = {036005}, abstract = {

The combination of\ brain-computer interfaces\ (BCIs) with robot-assisted physical therapy constitutes a promising approach to neurorehabilitation of patients with severe hemiparetic syndromes caused by cerebrovascular\ brain\ damage (e.g. stroke) and other neurological conditions. In such a scenario, a key aspect is how to reestablish the disrupted sensorimotor feedback loop. However, to date it is an open question how artificially closing the sensorimotor feedback loop influences the decoding performance of a\ BCI. In this paper, we answer this issue by studying six healthy subjects and two stroke patients. We present empirical evidence that haptic feedback, provided by a seven degrees of freedom robotic arm, facilitates online decoding of arm movement intention. The results support the feasibility of future rehabilitative treatments based on the combination of robot-assisted physical therapy with BCIs.

}, keywords = {Brain, Evoked Potentials, Motor, Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory, Feedback, Physiological, Female, Humans, Imagination, Male, Movement, Robotics, Touch, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1741-2552}, doi = {10.1088/1741-2560/8/3/036005}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21474878}, author = {Gomez-Rodriguez, M and Peters, J and Jeremy Jeremy Hill and Sch{\"o}lkopf, B and Gharabaghi, A and Grosse-Wentrup, Moritz} } @article {2203, title = {Current Trends in Hardware and Software for Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs).}, journal = {J Neural Eng}, volume = {8}, year = {2011}, month = {04/2011}, pages = {025001}, abstract = {

A\ brain-computer interface\ (BCI) provides a non-muscular communication channel to people with and without disabilities.\ BCI\ devices consist of hardware and software.\ BCI\ hardware records signals from the\ brain, either invasively or non-invasively, using a series of device components.\ BCI\ software then translates these signals into device output commands and provides feedback. One may categorize different types of\ BCI\ applications into the following four categories: basic\ research, clinical/translational\ research, consumer products, and emerging applications. These four categories use\ BCI\ hardware and software, but have different sets of requirements. For example, while basic\ research\ needs to explore a wide range of system configurations, and thus requires a wide range of hardware and software capabilities, applications in the other three categories may be designed for relatively narrow purposes and thus may only need a very limited subset of capabilities. This paper summarizes technical aspects for each of these four categories of\ BCI\ applications. The results indicate that\ BCI\ technology is in transition from isolated demonstrations to systematic\ research\ and commercial\ development. This process requires several multidisciplinary efforts, including the\ development\ of better integrated and more robust\ BCI\ hardware and software, the definition of standardized\ interfaces, and the\ developmentof certification, dissemination and reimbursement procedures.

}, keywords = {Biofeedback, Psychology, Brain, Brain Mapping, Electroencephalography, Equipment Design, Equipment Failure Analysis, Humans, Man-Machine Systems, Software, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1741-2552}, doi = {10.1088/1741-2560/8/2/025001}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21436536}, author = {Peter Brunner and Bianchi, L and Guger, C and Cincotti, F and Gerwin Schalk} } @article {2151, title = {Decoding vowels and consonants in spoken and imagined words using electrocorticographic signals in humans.}, journal = {J Neural Eng}, volume = {8}, year = {2011}, month = {08/2011}, pages = {046028}, abstract = {

Several stories in the popular media have speculated that it may be possible to infer from the brain which word a person is speaking or even thinking. While recent studies have demonstrated that brain signals can give detailed information about actual and imagined actions, such as different types of limb movements or spoken words, concrete experimental evidence for the possibility to {\textquoteright}read the mind{\textquoteright}, i.e. to interpret internally-generated speech, has been scarce. In this study, we found that it is possible to use signals recorded from the surface of the brain (electrocorticography) to discriminate the vowels and consonants embedded in spoken and in imagined words, and we defined the cortical areas that held the most information about discrimination of vowels and consonants. The results shed light on the distinct mechanisms associated with production of vowels and consonants, and could provide the basis for brain-based communication using imagined speech.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Communication Aids for Disabled, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Discrimination (Psychology), Electrodes, Implanted, Electroencephalography, Epilepsy, Female, Functional Laterality, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Movement, Speech Perception, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1741-2552}, doi = {10.1088/1741-2560/8/4/046028}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21750369}, author = {Pei, Xiao-Mei and Barbour, Dennis L and Leuthardt, E C and Gerwin Schalk} } @article {2133, title = {A graphical model framework for decoding in the visual ERP-based BCI speller.}, journal = {Neural Comput}, volume = {23}, year = {2011}, month = {01/2011}, pages = {160-82}, abstract = {

We present a graphical model framework for decoding in the visual ERP-based speller system. The proposed framework allows researchers to build generative models from which the decoding rules are obtained in a straightforward manner. We suggest two models for generating\ brain\ signals conditioned on the stimulus events. Both models incorporate letter frequency information but assume different dependencies between\ brain\ signals and stimulus events. For both models, we derive decoding rules and perform a discriminative training. We show on real visual speller data how decoding performance improves by incorporating letter frequency information and using a more realistic graphical model for the dependencies between the\ brain\ signals and the stimulus events. Furthermore, we discuss how the standard approach to decoding can be seen as a special case of the graphical model framework. The letter also gives more insight into the discriminative approach for decoding in the visual speller system.

}, keywords = {Artificial Intelligence, Computer User Training, Discrimination Learning, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Humans, Language, Models, Neurological, Models, Theoretical, Reading, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, User-Computer Interface, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception}, issn = {1530-888X}, doi = {10.1162/NECO_a_00066}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20964540}, author = {Martens, S M M and Mooij, J M and Jeremy Jeremy Hill and Farquhar, Jason and Sch{\"o}lkopf, B} } @article {2208, title = {Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Advances in Electrocorticography.}, journal = {Epilepsy Behav}, volume = {22}, year = {2011}, month = {12/2011}, pages = {641-50}, abstract = {

The Second International Workshop on Advances in Electrocorticography (ECoG) was convened in San Diego, CA, USA, on November 11-12, 2010. Between this meeting and the inaugural 2009 event, a much clearer picture has been emerging of cortical ECoG physiology and its relationship to local field potentials and single-cell recordings. Innovations in material engineering are advancing the goal of a stable long-term recording interface. Continued evolution of ECoG-driven brain-computer interface technology is determining innovation in neuroprosthetics. Improvements in instrumentation and statistical methodologies continue to elucidate ECoG correlates of normal human function as well as the ictal state. This proceedings document summarizes the current status of this rapidly evolving field.

}, keywords = {Brain, Brain Mapping, Brain Waves, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Electroencephalography, Epilepsy, Humans, United States, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1525-5069}, doi = {10.1016/j.yebeh.2011.09.028}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22036287}, author = {A L Ritaccio and Boatman-Reich, Dana and Peter Brunner and Cervenka, Mackenzie C and Cole, Andrew J and Nathan E. Crone and Duckrow, Robert and Korzeniewska, Anna and Litt, Brian and Miller, John W and Moran, D and Parvizi, Josef and Viventi, Jonathan and Williams, Justin C and Gerwin Schalk} } @article {3092, title = {Special issue containing contributions from the Fourth International Brain-Computer Interface Meeting.}, journal = {Journal of neural engineering}, volume = {8}, year = {2011}, month = {04/2011}, pages = {020201}, keywords = {User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1741-2552}, doi = {10.1088/1741-2560/8/2/020201}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21436522}, author = {Theresa M Vaughan and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {2205, title = {Toward a gaze-independent matrix speller brain-computer interface.}, journal = {Clin Neurophysiol}, volume = {122}, year = {2011}, month = {06/2011}, pages = {1063-4}, keywords = {Attention, Brain, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1872-8952}, doi = {10.1016/j.clinph.2010.11.014}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21183404}, author = {Peter Brunner and Gerwin Schalk} } @article {2131, title = {Transition from the locked in to the completely locked-in state: a physiological analysis.}, journal = {Clin Neurophysiol}, volume = {122}, year = {2011}, month = {06/2011}, pages = {925-33}, abstract = {

OBJECTIVE:\ 

To clarify the physiological and behavioral boundaries between locked-in (LIS) and the completely locked-in state (CLIS) (no voluntary eye movements, no communication possible) through electrophysiological data and to secure\ brain-computer-interface\ (BCI) communication.

METHODS:\ 

Electromyography from facial muscles, external anal sphincter (EAS), electrooculography and electrocorticographic data during different psychophysiological tests were acquired to define electrophysiological differences in an amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patient with an intracranially implanted grid of 112 electrodes for nine months while the patient passed from the LIS to the CLIS.

RESULTS:\ 

At the very end of the LIS there was no facial muscle activity, nor external anal sphincter but eye control. Eye movements were slow and lasted for short periods only. During CLIS event related\ brainpotentials (ERP) to passive limb movements and auditory stimuli were recorded, vibrotactile stimulation of different body parts resulted in no ERP response.

CONCLUSIONS:\ 

The results presented contradict the commonly accepted assumption that the EAS is the last remaining muscle under voluntary control and demonstrate complete loss of eye movements in CLIS. The eye muscle was shown to be the last muscle group under voluntary control. The findings suggest ALS as a multisystem disorder, even affecting afferent sensory pathways.

SIGNIFICANCE:\ 

Auditory and proprioceptive\ brain-computer-interface\ (BCI) systems are the only remaining communication channels in CLIS.

}, keywords = {Adult, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Area Under Curve, Brain, Communication Aids for Disabled, Disease Progression, Electroencephalography, Electromyography, Humans, Male, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1872-8952}, doi = {10.1016/j.clinph.2010.08.019}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20888292}, author = {Murguialday, A Ramos and Jeremy Jeremy Hill and Bensch, M and Martens, S M M and S Halder and Nijboer, F and Schoelkopf, Bernhard and Niels Birbaumer and Gharabaghi, A} } @article {2206, title = {Using the electrocorticographic speech network to control a brain-computer interface in humans.}, journal = {J Neural Eng}, volume = {8}, year = {2011}, month = {06/2011}, pages = {036004}, abstract = {

Electrocorticography (ECoG) has emerged as a new signal platform for\ brain-computer interface\ (BCI) systems. Classically, the cortical physiology that has been commonly investigated and utilized for device control in humans has been\ brain\ signals from the sensorimotor cortex. Hence, it was unknown whether other neurophysiological substrates, such as the speech network, could be used to further improve on or complement existing motor-based control paradigms. We demonstrate here for the first time that ECoG signals associated with different overt and imagined phoneme articulation can enable invasively monitored human patients to control a one-dimensional\ computer\ cursor rapidly and accurately. This phonetic content was distinguishable within higher gamma frequency oscillations and enabled users to achieve final target accuracies between 68\% and 91\% within 15 min. Additionally, one of the patients achieved robust control using recordings from a microarray consisting of 1 mm spaced microwires. These findings suggest that the cortical network associated with speech could provide an additional cognitive and physiologic substrate for\ BCI\ operation and that these signals can be acquired from a cortical array that is small and minimally invasive.

}, keywords = {Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Computer Peripherals, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Feedback, Physiological, Female, Humans, Imagination, Male, Middle Aged, Nerve Net, Speech Production Measurement, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1741-2552}, doi = {10.1088/1741-2560/8/3/036004}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21471638}, author = {Leuthardt, E C and Charles M Gaona and Sharma, Mohit and Szrama, Nicholas and Roland, Jarod and Zachary V. Freudenberg and Solisb, Jamie and Breshears, Jonathan and Gerwin Schalk} } @article {3101, title = {A brain-computer interface for long-term independent home use.}, journal = {Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis : official publication of the World Federation of Neurology Research Group on Motor Neuron Diseases}, volume = {11}, year = {2010}, month = {10/2010}, pages = {449{\textendash}455}, abstract = {Our objective was to develop and validate a new brain-computer interface (BCI) system suitable for long-term independent home use by people with severe motor disabilities. The BCI was used by a 51-year-old male with ALS who could no longer use conventional assistive devices. Caregivers learned to place the electrode cap, add electrode gel, and turn on the BCI. After calibration, the system allowed the user to communicate via EEG. Re-calibration was performed remotely (via the internet), and BCI accuracy assessed in periodic tests. Reports of BCI usefulness by the user and the family were also recorded. Results showed that BCI accuracy remained at 83\% (r = -.07, n.s.) for over 2.5 years (1.4\% expected by chance). The BCI user and his family state that the BCI had restored his independence in social interactions and at work. He uses the BCI to run his NIH-funded research laboratory and to communicate via e-mail with family, friends, and colleagues. In addition to this first user, several other similarly disabled people are now using the BCI in their daily lives. In conclusion, long-term independent home use of this BCI system is practical for severely disabled people, and can contribute significantly to quality of life and productivity.}, keywords = {User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1471-180X}, doi = {10.3109/17482961003777470}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20583947}, author = {Sellers, Eric W. and Theresa M Vaughan and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {2194, title = {Brain-computer interfacing based on cognitive control.}, journal = {Ann Neurol}, volume = {67}, year = {2010}, month = {06/2010}, pages = {809-16}, abstract = {

OBJECTIVE:\ 

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) translate deliberate intentions and associated changes in brain activity into action, thereby offering patients with severe paralysis an alternative means of communication with and control over their environment. Such systems are not available yet, partly due to the high performance standard that is required. A major challenge in the development of implantable BCIs is to identify cortical regions and related functions that an individual can reliably and consciously manipulate. Research predominantly focuses on the sensorimotor cortex, which can be activated by imagining motor actions. However, because this region may not provide an optimal solution to all patients, other neuronal networks need to be examined. Therefore, we investigated whether the cognitive control network can be used for BCI purposes. We also determined the feasibility of using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) for noninvasive localization of the cognitive control network.

METHODS:\ 

Three patients with intractable epilepsy, who were temporarily implanted with subdural grid electrodes for diagnostic purposes, attempted to gain BCI control using the electrocorticographic (ECoG) signal of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC).

RESULTS:\ 

All subjects quickly gained accurate BCI control by modulation of gamma-power of the left DLPFC. Prelocalization of the relevant region was performed with fMRI and was confirmed using the ECoG signals obtained during mental calculation localizer tasks.

INTERPRETATION:\ 

The results indicate that the cognitive control network is a suitable source of signals for BCI applications. They also demonstrate the feasibility of translating understanding about cognitive networks derived from functional neuroimaging into clinical applications.

}, keywords = {Cognition, Computers, Electrodes, Electroencephalography, Epilepsy, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxygen, Prefrontal Cortex, Psychomotor Performance, Spectrum Analysis, Time Factors, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1531-8249}, doi = {10.1002/ana.21985}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20517943}, author = {Vansteensel, Mariska J and Hermes, Dora and Aarnoutse, Erik J and Bleichner, Martin G and Gerwin Schalk and van Rijen, Peter C and Leijten, Frans S S and Ramsey, Nick F} } @article {2200, title = {Does the {\textquoteright}P300{\textquoteright} speller depend on eye gaze?.}, journal = {J Neural Eng}, volume = {7}, year = {2010}, month = {10/2010}, pages = {056013}, abstract = {

Many people affected by debilitating neuromuscular disorders such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, brainstem stroke or spinal cord injury are impaired in their ability to, or are even unable to, communicate. A brain-computer interface (BCI) uses brain signals, rather than muscles, to re-establish communication with the outside world. One particular BCI approach is the so-called {\textquoteright}P300 matrix speller{\textquoteright} that was first described by Farwell and Donchin (1988 Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 70 510-23). It has been widely assumed that this method does not depend on the ability to focus on the desired character, because it was thought that it relies primarily on the P300-evoked potential and minimally, if at all, on other EEG features such as the visual-evoked potential (VEP). This issue is highly relevant for the clinical application of this BCI method, because eye movements may be impaired or lost in the relevant user population. This study investigated the extent to which the performance in a {\textquoteright}P300{\textquoteright} speller BCI depends on eye gaze. We evaluated the performance of 17 healthy subjects using a {\textquoteright}P300{\textquoteright} matrix speller under two conditions. Under one condition ({\textquoteright}letter{\textquoteright}), the subjects focused their eye gaze on the intended letter, while under the second condition ({\textquoteright}center{\textquoteright}), the subjects focused their eye gaze on a fixation cross that was located in the center of the matrix. The results show that the performance of the {\textquoteright}P300{\textquoteright} matrix speller in normal subjects depends in considerable measure on gaze direction. They thereby disprove a widespread assumption in BCI research, and suggest that this BCI might function more effectively for people who retain some eye-movement control. The applicability of these findings to people with severe neuromuscular disabilities (particularly in eye-movements) remains to be determined.

}, keywords = {Adult, Event-Related Potentials, P300, Eye Movements, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Neurological, Photic Stimulation, User-Computer Interface, Young Adult}, issn = {1741-2552}, doi = {10.1088/1741-2560/7/5/056013}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20858924}, author = {Peter Brunner and Joshi, S and S Briskin and Jonathan Wolpaw and H Bischof and Gerwin Schalk} } @article {3103, title = {Electroencephalographic (EEG) control of three-dimensional movement.}, journal = {Journal of neural engineering}, volume = {7}, year = {2010}, month = {06/2010}, pages = {036007}, abstract = {Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) can use brain signals from the scalp (EEG), the cortical surface (ECoG), or within the cortex to restore movement control to people who are paralyzed. Like muscle-based skills, BCIs{\textquoteright} use requires activity-dependent adaptations in the brain that maintain stable relationships between the person{\textquoteright}s intent and the signals that convey it. This study shows that humans can learn over a series of training sessions to use EEG for three-dimensional control. The responsible EEG features are focused topographically on the scalp and spectrally in specific frequency bands. People acquire simultaneous control of three independent signals (one for each dimension) and reach targets in a virtual three-dimensional space. Such BCI control in humans has not been reported previously. The results suggest that with further development noninvasive EEG-based BCIs might control the complex movements of robotic arms or neuroprostheses.}, keywords = {User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1741-2552}, doi = {10.1088/1741-2560/7/3/036007}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20460690}, author = {Dennis J. McFarland and Sarnacki, William A. and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {2195, title = {A procedure for measuring latencies in brain-computer interfaces.}, journal = {IEEE Trans Biomed Eng}, volume = {57}, year = {2010}, month = {06/2010}, pages = {1785-97}, abstract = {

Brain-computer interface (BCI) systems must process neural signals with consistent timing in order to support adequate system performance. Thus, it is important to have the capability to determine whether a particular BCI configuration (i.e., hardware and software) provides adequate timing performance for a particular experiment. This report presents a method of measuring and quantifying different aspects of system timing in several typical BCI experiments across a range of settings, and presents comprehensive measures of expected overall system latency for each experimental configuration.

}, keywords = {Brain, Computer Systems, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Models, Neurological, Reproducibility of Results, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Time Factors, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1558-2531}, doi = {10.1109/TBME.2010.2047259}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20403781}, author = {Adam J Wilson and Mellinger, J{\"u}rgen and Gerwin Schalk and Williams, Justin C} } @article {3107, title = {Brain-computer interface research at the wadsworth center developments in noninvasive communication and control.}, journal = {International review of neurobiology}, volume = {86}, year = {2009}, month = {02/2009}, pages = {147{\textendash}157}, abstract = {Brain-computer interface (BCI) research at the Wadsworth Center focuses on noninvasive, electroencephalography (EEG)-based BCI methods for helping severely disabled individuals communicate and interact with their environment. We have demonstrated that these individuals, as well as able-bodied individuals, can learn to use sensorimotor rhythms (SMRs) to move a cursor rapidly and accurately in one and two dimensions. We have also developed a practical P300-based BCI that enables users to access and control the full functionality of their personal computer. We are currently translating this laboratory-proved BCI technology into a system that can be used by severely disabled individuals in their homes with minimal ongoing technical oversight. Our comprehensive approach to BCI design has led to several innovations that are applicable in other BCI contexts, such as space missions.}, keywords = {User-Computer Interface}, issn = {0074-7742}, doi = {10.1016/S0074-7742(09)86011-X}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19607997}, author = {Krusienski, Dean J. and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @proceedings {2241, title = {Detection of spontaneous class-specific visual stimuli with high temporal accuracy in human electrocorticography.}, volume = {2009}, year = {2009}, month = {2009}, pages = {6465-8}, abstract = {Most brain-computer interface classification experiments from electrical potential recordings have been focused on the identification of classes of stimuli or behavior where the timing of experimental parameters is known or pre-designated. Real world experience, however, is spontaneous, and to this end we describe an experiment predicting the occurrence, timing, and types of visual stimuli perceived by a human subject from electrocorticographic recordings. All 300 of 300 presented stimuli were correctly detected, with a temporal precision of order 20 ms. The type of stimulus (face/house) was correctly identified in 95\% of these cases. There were approximately 20 false alarm events, corresponding to a late 2nd neuronal response to a previously identified event.}, keywords = {Algorithms, Electrocardiography, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Humans, Male, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, User-Computer Interface, Visual Cortex}, issn = {1557-170X}, doi = {10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5333546}, author = {Miller, John W and Hermes, Dora and Gerwin Schalk and Ramsey, Nick F and Jagadeesh, Bharathi and den Nijs, Marcel and Ojemann, J G and Rao, Rajesh P N} } @proceedings {2243, title = {Effective brain-computer interfacing using BCI2000.}, volume = {2009}, year = {2009}, month = {2009}, pages = {5498-501}, abstract = {To facilitate research and development in Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) research, we have been developing a general-purpose BCI system, called BCI2000, over the past nine years. This system has enjoyed a growing adoption in BCI and related areas and has been the basis for some of the most impressive studies reported to date. This paper gives an update on the status of this project by describing the principles of the BCI2000 system, its benefits, and impact on the field to date.}, keywords = {Algorithms, Brain, Electrocardiography, Equipment Design, Equipment Failure Analysis, Rehabilitation, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1557-170X}, doi = {10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5334558}, author = {Gerwin Schalk} } @article {2191, title = {Evolution of brain-computer interfaces: going beyond classic motor physiology.}, journal = {Neurosurg Focus}, volume = {27}, year = {2009}, month = {07/2009}, pages = {E4}, abstract = {

The notion that a computer can decode brain signals to infer the intentions of a human and then enact those intentions directly through a machine is becoming a realistic technical possibility. These types of devices are known as brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). The evolution of these neuroprosthetic technologies could have significant implications for patients with motor disabilities by enhancing their ability to interact and communicate with their environment. The cortical physiology most investigated and used for device control has been brain signals from the primary motor cortex. To date, this classic motor physiology has been an effective substrate for demonstrating the potential efficacy of BCI-based control. However, emerging research now stands to further enhance our understanding of the cortical physiology underpinning human intent and provide further signals for more complex brain-derived control. In this review, the authors report the current status of BCIs and detail the emerging research trends that stand to augment clinical applications in the future.

}, keywords = {Brain, Cerebral Cortex, Humans, Man-Machine Systems, Motor Cortex, Movement, Movement Disorders, Neuronal Plasticity, Prostheses and Implants, Research, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1092-0684}, doi = {10.3171/2009.4.FOCUS0979}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19569892}, author = {Leuthardt, E C and Gerwin Schalk and Roland, Jarod and Rouse, Adam and Moran, D} } @article {2135, title = {A note on ethical aspects of BCI.}, journal = {Neural Netw}, volume = {22}, year = {2009}, month = {11/2009 }, pages = {1352-7}, abstract = {

This paper focuses on ethical aspects of BCI, as a research and a clinical tool, that are challenging for practitioners currently working in the field. Specifically, the difficulties involved in acquiring informed consent from locked-in patients are investigated, in combination with an analysis of the shared moral responsibility in BCI teams, and the complications encountered in establishing effective communication with media.

}, keywords = {Bioethics, Brain, Communication, Communications Media, Cooperative Behavior, Humans, Informed Consent, Professional-Patient Relations, Quadriplegia, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1879-2782}, doi = {10.1016/j.neunet.2009.06.046}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19616405}, author = {Haselager, Pim and Vlek, Rutger and Jeremy Jeremy Hill and Nijboer, F} } @article {2136, title = {Overlap and refractory effects in a brain-computer interface speller based on the visual P300 event-related potential.}, journal = {J Neural Eng}, volume = {6}, year = {2009}, month = {04/2009}, pages = {026003}, abstract = {

We reveal the presence of refractory and overlap effects in the event-related potentials in visual P300 speller datasets, and we show their negative impact on the performance of the system. This finding has important implications for how to encode the letters that can be selected for communication. However, we show that such effects are dependent on stimulus parameters: an alternative stimulus type based on apparent motion suffers less from the refractory effects and leads to an improved letter prediction performance.

}, keywords = {Algorithms, Brain, Cognition, Computer Simulation, Electroencephalography, Event-Related Potentials, P300, Humans, Models, Neurological, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Photic Stimulation, Semantics, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Task Performance and Analysis, User-Computer Interface, Writing}, issn = {1741-2552}, doi = {10.1088/1741-2560/6/2/026003}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19255462}, author = {Martens, S M M and Jeremy Jeremy Hill and Farquhar, Jason and Sch{\"o}lkopf, B} } @article {2190, title = {Using an EEG-based brain-computer interface for virtual cursor movement with BCI2000.}, journal = {J Vis Exp}, year = {2009}, month = {07/2009}, abstract = {

A brain-computer interface (BCI) functions by translating a neural signal, such as the electroencephalogram (EEG), into a signal that can be used to control a computer or other device. The amplitude of the EEG signals in selected frequency bins are measured and translated into a device command, in this case the horizontal and vertical velocity of a computer cursor. First, the EEG electrodes are applied to the user s scalp using a cap to record brain activity. Next, a calibration procedure is used to find the EEG electrodes and features that the user will learn to voluntarily modulate to use the BCI. In humans, the power in the mu (8-12 Hz) and beta (18-28 Hz) frequency bands decrease in amplitude during a real or imagined movement. These changes can be detected in the EEG in real-time, and used to control a BCI ([1],[2]). Therefore, during a screening test, the user is asked to make several different imagined movements with their hands and feet to determine the unique EEG features that change with the imagined movements. The results from this calibration will show the best channels to use, which are configured so that amplitude changes in the mu and beta frequency bands move the cursor either horizontally or vertically. In this experiment, the general purpose BCI system BCI2000 is used to control signal acquisition, signal processing, and feedback to the user [3].

}, keywords = {Brain, Calibration, Electrodes, Electroencephalography, Humans, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1940-087X}, doi = {10.3791/1319}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19641479}, author = {Adam J Wilson and Gerwin Schalk and Walton, L{\'e}o M and Williams, Justin C} } @article {2189, title = {Advanced neurotechnologies for chronic neural interfaces: new horizons and clinical opportunities.}, journal = {J Neurosci}, volume = {28}, year = {2008}, month = {11/2008}, pages = {11830-8}, keywords = {Cerebral Cortex, Electrodes, Implanted, Electroencephalography, Electronics, Medical, Electrophysiology, Evoked Potentials, Movement Disorders, Neurons, Prostheses and Implants, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1529-2401}, doi = {10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3879-08.2008}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19005048?report=abstract}, author = {Kipke, Daryl R and Shain, William and Buzs{\'a}ki, Gy{\"o}rgy and Fetz, Eberhard E and Henderson, Jaimie M and Hetke, Jamille F and Gerwin Schalk} } @article {2183, title = {Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs): Detection Instead of Classification.}, journal = {J Neurosci Methods}, volume = {167}, year = {2008}, month = {01/2008}, pages = {51-62}, abstract = {

Many studies over the past two decades have shown that people can use\ brain\ signals to convey their intent to a\ computer\ through\ brain-computer interfaces\ (BCIs). These devices operate by recording signals from the\ brain\ and translating these signals into device commands. They can be used by people who are severely paralyzed to communicate without any use of muscle activity. One of the major impediments in translating this novel technology into\ clinical\ applications is the current requirement for preliminary analyses to identify the\ brain\ signal features best suited for communication. This paper introduces and validates signal detection, which does not require such analysis procedures, as a new concept in BCI signal processing. This detection concept is realized with Gaussian mixture models (GMMs) that are used to model resting\ brain\ activity so that any change in\ relevantbrain\ signals can be detected. It is implemented in a package called SIGFRIED (SIGnal modeling For Real-time Identification and Event Detection). The results indicate that SIGFRIED produces results that are within the range of those achieved using a common analysis strategy that requires preliminary identification of signal features. They indicate that such laborious analysis procedures could be replaced by merely recording\ brain\ signals during rest. In summary, this paper demonstrates how SIGFRIED could be used to overcome one of the present impediments to translation of laboratory BCI demonstrations into clinically practical applications.

}, keywords = {Adult, Algorithms, Brain, Brain Mapping, Electrocardiography, Electroencephalography, Humans, Male, Man-Machine Systems, Normal Distribution, Online Systems, Signal Detection, Psychological, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Software Validation, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {0165-0270}, doi = {10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.08.010}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17920134}, author = {Gerwin Schalk and Peter Brunner and Lester A Gerhardt and H Bischof and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {3112, title = {Brain-computer interfaces in neurological rehabilitation.}, journal = {Lancet neurology}, volume = {7}, year = {2008}, month = {11/2008}, pages = {1032{\textendash}1043}, abstract = {Recent advances in analysis of brain signals, training patients to control these signals, and improved computing capabilities have enabled people with severe motor disabilities to use their brain signals for communication and control of objects in their environment, thereby bypassing their impaired neuromuscular system. Non-invasive, electroencephalogram (EEG)-based brain-computer interface (BCI) technologies can be used to control a computer cursor or a limb orthosis, for word processing and accessing the internet, and for other functions such as environmental control or entertainment. By re-establishing some independence, BCI technologies can substantially improve the lives of people with devastating neurological disorders such as advanced amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. BCI technology might also restore more effective motor control to people after stroke or other traumatic brain disorders by helping to guide activity-dependent brain plasticity by use of EEG brain signals to indicate to the patient the current state of brain activity and to enable the user to subsequently lower abnormal activity. Alternatively, by use of brain signals to supplement impaired muscle control, BCIs might increase the efficacy of a rehabilitation protocol and thus improve muscle control for the patient.}, keywords = {User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1474-4422}, doi = {10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70223-0}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18835541}, author = {Janis J. Daly and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {2244, title = {Brain-computer symbiosis.}, journal = {J Neural Eng}, volume = {5}, year = {2008}, month = {03/2008}, pages = {P1-P15}, abstract = {

The theoretical groundwork of the 1930s and 1940s and the technical advance of computers in the following decades provided the basis for dramatic increases in human efficiency. While computers continue to evolve, and we can still expect increasing benefits from their use, the interface between humans and computers has begun to present a serious impediment to full realization of the potential payoff. This paper is about the theoretical and practical possibility that direct communication between the\ brain\ and the\ computer\ can be used to overcome this impediment by improving or augmenting conventional forms of human communication. It is about the opportunity that the limitations of our body{\textquoteright}s input and output capacities can be overcome using direct interaction with the\ brain, and it discusses the assumptions, possible limitations and implications of a technology that I anticipate will be a major source of pervasive changes in the coming decades.

}, keywords = {Brain, Computers, Humans, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1741-2560}, doi = {10.1088/1741-2560/5/1/P01}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18310804}, author = {Gerwin Schalk} } @article {2107, title = {Electrocorticographic interictal spike removal via denoising source separation for improved neuroprosthesis control.}, journal = {Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc}, volume = {2008}, year = {2008}, month = {08/2008}, pages = {5224-7}, abstract = {

Electrocorticographic (ECoG) neuroprosthesis is a promising area of research that could provide channels of communication and control for patients who have lost their motor functions due to damage to the nervous system. However, implantation of subdural electrodes are clinically restricted to diagnostics of pre-surgical epileptic patients. Hence, interictal activity is present in the recordings across various areas of the sensorimotor cortex and suppresses the amplitude modulated features extracted to model hand trajectories. Denoising source separation is a recently introduced framework which extracts hidden structures of interest within the\ data\ through denoising the source estimates with filters designed around prior knowledge on the observations. Herein, we exploit the high amplitude quasiperiodic nature of the observed interictal spikes and show that removal of the interictal activity improves linear prediction of hand trajectories.

}, keywords = {Algorithms, Artifacts, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Electroencephalography, Epilepsy, Evoked Potentials, Motor, Motor Cortex, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1557-170X}, doi = {10.1109/IEMBS.2008.4650392}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19163895}, author = {Gunduz, Aysegul and Sanchez, Justin C and Principe, Jose} } @article {3131, title = {Emulation of computer mouse control with a noninvasive brain-computer interface.}, journal = {Journal of neural engineering}, volume = {5}, year = {2008}, month = {06/2008}, pages = {101{\textendash}110}, abstract = {Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology can provide nonmuscular communication and control to people who are severely paralyzed. BCIs can use noninvasive or invasive techniques for recording the brain signals that convey the user{\textquoteright}s commands. Although noninvasive BCIs are used for simple applications, it has frequently been assumed that only invasive BCIs, which use electrodes implanted in the brain, will be able to provide multidimensional sequential control of a robotic arm or a neuroprosthesis. The present study shows that a noninvasive BCI using scalp-recorded electroencephalographic (EEG) activity and an adaptive algorithm can provide people, including people with spinal cord injuries, with two-dimensional cursor movement and target selection. Multiple targets were presented around the periphery of a computer screen, with one designated as the correct target. The user{\textquoteright}s task was to use EEG to move a cursor from the center of the screen to the correct target and then to use an additional EEG feature to select the target. If the cursor reached an incorrect target, the user was instructed not to select it. Thus, this task emulated the key features of mouse operation. The results indicate that people with severe motor disabilities could use brain signals for sequential multidimensional movement and selection.}, keywords = {User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1741-2560}, doi = {10.1088/1741-2560/5/2/001}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18367779}, author = {Dennis J. McFarland and Krusienski, Dean J. and Sarnacki, William A. and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {2098, title = {Extraction and localization of mesoscopic motor control signals for human ECoG neuroprosthetics.}, journal = {J Neurosci Methods}, volume = {167}, year = {2008}, month = {01/2008}, pages = {63-81}, abstract = {

Electrocorticogram (ECoG) recordings for\ neuroprosthetics\ provide a\ mesoscopic\ level of abstraction of brain function between microwire single neuron recordings and the electroencephalogram (EEG). Single-trial\ ECoG\ neural interfaces require appropriate feature\ extraction\ and signal processing methods to identify and model in real-time signatures of\ motor\ events in spontaneous brain activity. Here, we develop the clinical experimental paradigm and analysis tools to record broadband (1Hz to 6kHz)\ ECoG\ from patients participating in a reaching and pointing task. Motivated by the significant role of amplitude modulated rate coding in extracellular spike based brain-machine interfaces (BMIs), we develop methods to quantify spatio-temporal intermittent increased\ ECoG\ voltages to determine if they provide viable\ control\ inputs for\ ECoG\ neural interfaces. This study seeks to explore preprocessing modalities that emphasize amplitude modulation across frequencies and channels in the\ ECoG\ above the level of noisy background fluctuations in order to derive the commands for complex, continuous\ control\ tasks. Preliminary experiments show that it is possible to derive online predictive models and spatially localize the generation of commands in the cortex for\ motor\ tasks using amplitude modulated\ ECoG.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Biofeedback, Psychology, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Electroencephalography, Epilepsies, Partial, Female, Hand, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Physical Therapy Modalities, Psychomotor Performance, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Spectrum Analysis, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {0165-0270}, doi = {10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.04.019}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17582507}, author = {Sanchez, Justin C and Gunduz, Aysegul and Carney, Paul R and Principe, Jose} } @article {2185, title = {Non-invasive brain-computer interface system: towards its application as assistive technology.}, journal = {Brain Res Bull}, volume = {75}, year = {2008}, month = {04/2008}, pages = {796-803}, abstract = {

The quality of life of people suffering from severe motor disabilities can benefit from the use of current assistive technology capable of ameliorating communication, house-environment management and mobility, according to the user{\textquoteright}s residual motor abilities.\ Brain-computer interfaces\ (BCIs) are systems that can translate\ brain\ activity into signals that control external devices. Thus they can represent the only technology for severely paralyzed patients to increase or maintain their communication and control options. Here we report on a pilot study in which a system was implemented and validated to allow disabled persons to improve or recover their mobility (directly or by emulation) and communication within the surrounding environment. The system is based on a software controller that offers to the user a communication interface that is matched with the individual{\textquoteright}s residual motor abilities. Patients (n=14) with severe motor disabilities due to progressive neurodegenerative disorders were trained to use the system prototype under a rehabilitation program carried out in a house-like furnished space. All users utilized regular assistive control options (e.g., microswitches or head trackers). In addition, four subjects learned to operate the system by means of a non-invasive EEG-based BCI. This system was controlled by the subjects{\textquoteright} voluntary modulations of EEG sensorimotor rhythms recorded on the scalp; this skill was learnt even though the subjects have not had control over their limbs for a long time. We conclude that such a prototype system, which integrates several different assistive technologies including a BCI system, can potentially facilitate the translation from pre-clinical\ demonstrations to a\ clinical\ useful BCI.

}, keywords = {Activities of Daily Living, Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Child, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Motor, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Skills, Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne, Pilot Projects, Prostheses and Implants, Robotics, Self-Help Devices, Software, Spinal Muscular Atrophies of Childhood, User-Computer Interface, Volition}, issn = {0361-9230}, doi = {10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.01.007}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18394526}, author = {Cincotti, F and Mattia, Donatella and Aloise, Fabio and Bufalari, Simona and Gerwin Schalk and Oriolo, Giuseppe and Cherubini, Andrea and Marciani, Maria Grazia and Babiloni, Fabio} } @article {3129, title = {Sensorimotor rhythm-based brain-computer interface (BCI): model order selection for autoregressive spectral analysis.}, journal = {Journal of neural engineering}, volume = {5}, year = {2008}, month = {06/2008}, pages = {155{\textendash}162}, abstract = {People can learn to control EEG features consisting of sensorimotor rhythm amplitudes and can use this control to move a cursor in one or two dimensions to a target on a screen. Cursor movement depends on the estimate of the amplitudes of sensorimotor rhythms. Autoregressive models are often used to provide these estimates. The order of the autoregressive model has varied widely among studies. Through analyses of both simulated and actual EEG data, the present study examines the effects of model order on sensorimotor rhythm measurements and BCI performance. The results show that resolution of lower frequency signals requires higher model orders and that this requirement reflects the temporal span of the model coefficients. This is true for both simulated EEG data and actual EEG data during brain-computer interface (BCI) operation. Increasing model order, and decimating the signal were similarly effective in increasing spectral resolution. Furthermore, for BCI control of two-dimensional cursor movement, higher model orders produced better performance in each dimension and greater independence between horizontal and vertical movements. In sum, these results show that autoregressive model order selection is an important determinant of BCI performance and should be based on criteria that reflect system performance.}, keywords = {User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1741-2560}, doi = {10.1088/1741-2560/5/2/006}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18430974}, author = {Dennis J. McFarland and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {2112, title = {SPIDER image processing for single-particle reconstruction of biological macromolecules from electron micrographs.}, journal = {Nat Protoc}, volume = {3}, year = {2008}, month = {10/2008}, pages = {1941-74}, abstract = {

This protocol describes the reconstruction of biological molecules from the electron micrographs of single particles. Computation here is performed using the image-processing software SPIDER and can be managed using a graphical user interface, termed the SPIDER Reconstruction Engine. Two approaches are described to obtain an initial reconstruction: random-conical tilt and common lines. Once an existing model is available, reference-based alignment can be used, a procedure that can be iterated. Also described is supervised classification, a method to look for homogeneous subsets when multiple known conformations of the molecule may coexist.

}, keywords = {Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Microscopy, Electron, Models, Molecular, Molecular Structure, Software, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1750-2799}, doi = {10.1038/nprot.2008.156}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19180078}, author = {Shaikh, Tanvir R and Gao, Haixiao and Baxter, Bill and Asturias, Francisco J and Boisset, Nicolas and Leith, ArDean and Frank, Joachim} } @conference {3438, title = {Three cases of feature correlation in an electrocorticographic BCI.}, booktitle = {Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2008.}, year = {2008}, month = {08/2008}, publisher = {IEEE}, organization = {IEEE}, address = {Vancouver, BC}, abstract = {Three human subjects participated in a closed-loop brain computer interface cursor control experiment mediated by implanted subdural electrocorticographic arrays. The paradigm consisted of several stages: baseline recording, hand and tongue motor tasks as the basis for feature selection, two closed-loop one-dimensional feedback experiments with each of these features, and a two-dimensional feedback experiment using both of the features simultaneously. The two selected features were simple channel and frequency band combinations associated with change during hand and tongue movement. Inter-feature correlation and cross-correlation between features during different epochs of each task were quantified for each stage of the experiment. Our anecdotal, three subject, result suggests that while high correlation between horizontal and vertical control signal can initially preclude successful two-dimensional cursor control, a feedback-based learning strategy can be successfully employed by the subject to overcome this limitation and progressively decorrelate these control signals.}, keywords = {Adolescent, Adult, Algorithms, automated pattern recognition, control systems, decorrelation, Electrocardiography, Electrodes, Electroencephalography, evoked motor potentials, Feedback, Female, frequency, hospitals, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Cortex, Signal Processing, Statistics as Topic, Task Performance and Analysis, Tongue, User-Computer Interface}, doi = {10.1109/IEMBS.2008.4650415}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19163918}, author = {Miller, Kai J and Blakely, Timothy and Gerwin Schalk and den Nijs, Marcel and Rao, Rajesh PN and Ojemann, Jeffrey G} } @proceedings {2240, title = {Three cases of feature correlation in an electrocorticographic BCI.}, year = {2008}, month = {2008}, pages = {5318-21}, abstract = {Three human subjects participated in a closed-loop brain computer interface cursor control experiment mediated by implanted subdural electrocorticographic arrays. The paradigm consisted of several stages: baseline recording, hand and tongue motor tasks as the basis for feature selection, two closed-loop one-dimensional feedback experiments with each of these features, and a two-dimensional feedback experiment using both of the features simultaneously. The two selected features were simple channel and frequency band combinations associated with change during hand and tongue movement. Inter-feature correlation and cross-correlation between features during different epochs of each task were quantified for each stage of the experiment. Our anecdotal, three subject, result suggests that while high correlation between horizontal and vertical control signal can initially preclude successful two-dimensional cursor control, a feedback-based learning strategy can be successfully employed by the subject to overcome this limitation and progressively decorrelate these control signals.}, keywords = {Adolescent, Adult, Algorithms, Electrocardiography, Evoked Potentials, Motor, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Cortex, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Statistics as Topic, Task Performance and Analysis, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1557-170X}, doi = {10.1109/IEMBS.2008.4650415}, author = {Miller, John W and Blakely, Timothy and Gerwin Schalk and den Nijs, Marcel and Rao, Rajesh P N and Ojemann, J G} } @article {2184, title = {Towards an independent brain-computer interface using steady state visual evoked potentials.}, journal = {Clin Neurophysiol}, volume = {119}, year = {2008}, month = {02/2008}, pages = {399-408}, abstract = {

OBJECTIVE:\ 

Brain-computer interface (BCI) systems using steady state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) have allowed healthy subjects to communicate. However, these systems may not work in severely disabled users because they may depend on gaze shifting. This study evaluates the hypothesis that overlapping stimuli can evoke changes in SSVEP activity sufficient to control a BCI. This would provide evidence that SSVEP BCIs could be used without shifting gaze.

METHODS:\ 

Subjects viewed a display containing two images that each oscillated at a different frequency. Different conditions used overlapping or non-overlapping images to explore dependence on gaze function. Subjects were asked to direct attention to one or the other of these images during each of 12 one-minute runs.

RESULTS:\ 

Half of the subjects produced differences in SSVEP activity elicited by overlapping stimuli that could support BCI control. In all remaining users, differences did exist at corresponding frequencies but were not strong enough to allow effective control.

CONCLUSIONS:\ 

The\ data\ demonstrate that SSVEP differences sufficient for BCI control may be elicited by selective attention to one of two overlapping stimuli. Thus, some SSVEP-based BCI approaches may not depend on gaze control. The nature and extent of any BCI{\textquoteright}s dependence on muscle activity is a function of many factors, including the display, task, environment, and user.

SIGNIFICANCE:\ 

SSVEP BCIs might function in severely disabled users unable to reliably control gaze. Further research with these users is necessary to explore the optimal parameters of such a system and validate online performance in a home environment.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Brain, Brain Mapping, Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Female, Humans, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Spectrum Analysis, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1388-2457}, doi = {10.1016/j.clinph.2007.09.121}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18077208}, author = {Brendan Z. Allison and Dennis J. McFarland and Gerwin Schalk and Zheng, Shi Dong and Moore-Jackson, Melody and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {2186, title = {Two-dimensional movement control using electrocorticographic signals in humans.}, journal = {J Neural Eng}, volume = {5}, year = {2008}, month = {03/2008}, pages = {75-84}, abstract = {

We show here that a\ brain-computer\ interface (BCI) using electrocorticographic activity (ECoG) and imagined or overt motor tasks enables humans to control a\ computer\ cursor in two dimensions. Over a brief training period of 12-36 min, each of five human subjects acquired substantial control of particular ECoG features recorded from several locations over the same hemisphere, and achieved average success rates of 53-73\% in a two-dimensional four-target center-out task in which chance accuracy was 25\%. Our results support the expectation that ECoG-based BCIs can combine high performance with technical and\ clinical\ practicality, and also indicate promising directions for further research.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Adult, Brain Mapping, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Drug Resistance, Electrocardiography, Electrodes, Implanted, Electroencephalography, Epilepsy, Female, Humans, Male, Movement, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1741-2560}, doi = {10.1088/1741-2560/5/1/008}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18310813}, author = {Gerwin Schalk and Miller, K.J. and Nicholas R Anderson and Adam J Wilson and Smyth, Matt and Ojemann, J G and Moran, D and Jonathan Wolpaw and Leuthardt, E C} } @article {2188, title = {Unique cortical physiology associated with ipsilateral hand movements and neuroprosthetic implications.}, journal = {Stroke}, volume = {39}, year = {2008}, month = {12/2008}, pages = {3351-9}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:\ 

Brain computer interfaces\ (BCIs) offer little direct benefit to patients with hemispheric stroke because current platforms rely on signals derived from the contralateral motor cortex (the same region injured by the stroke). For BCIs to assist hemiparetic patients, the implant must use unaffected cortex ipsilateral to the affected limb. This requires the identification of distinct electrophysiological features from the motor cortex associated with ipsilateral hand movements.

METHODS:\ 

In this study we studied 6 patients undergoing temporary placement of intracranial electrode arrays. Electrocorticographic (ECoG) signals were recorded while the subjects engaged in specific ipsilateral or contralateral hand motor tasks. Spectral changes were identified with regards to frequency, location, and timing.

RESULTS:\ 

Ipsilateral hand movements were associated with electrophysiological changes that occur in lower frequency spectra, at distinct anatomic locations, and earlier than changes associated with contralateral hand movements. In a subset of 3 patients, features specific to ipsilateral and contralateral hand movements were used to control a cursor on a screen in real time. In ipsilateral derived control this was optimal with lower frequency spectra.

CONCLUSIONS:\ 

There are distinctive cortical electrophysiological features associated with ipsilateral movements which can be used for device control. These findings have implications for patients with hemispheric stroke because they offer a potential methodology for which a single hemisphere can be used to enhance the function of a stroke induced hemiparesis.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Adult, Artificial Limbs, Bionics, Brain Mapping, Child, Dominance, Cerebral, Electroencephalography, Female, Hand, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Cortex, Movement, Paresis, Prosthesis Design, Psychomotor Performance, Stroke, User-Computer Interface, Volition}, issn = {1524-4628}, doi = {10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.518175}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18927456}, author = {Wisneski, Kimberly and Nicholas R Anderson and Gerwin Schalk and Smyth, Matt and Moran, D and Leuthardt, E C} } @article {2137, title = {Voluntary brain regulation and communication with electrocorticogram signals.}, journal = {Epilepsy Behav}, volume = {13}, year = {2008}, month = {08/2008}, pages = {300-6}, abstract = {

Brain-computer interfaces\ (BCIs) can be used for communication in writing without muscular activity or for learning to control seizures by voluntary regulation of\ brain\ signals such as the electroencephalogram (EEG). Three of five patients with epilepsy were able to spell their names with electrocorticogram (ECoG) signals derived from motor-related areas within only one or two training sessions. Imagery of finger or tongue movements was classified with support-vector classification of autoregressive coefficients derived from the ECoG signals. After training of the classifier, binary classification responses were used to select letters from a\ computer-generated menu. Offline analysis showed increased theta activity in the unsuccessful patients, whereas the successful patients exhibited dominant sensorimotor rhythms that they could control. The high spatial resolution and increased signal-to-noise ratio in ECoG signals, combined with short training periods, may offer an alternative for communication in complete paralysis, locked-in syndrome, and motor restoration.

}, keywords = {Adult, Biofeedback, Psychology, Cerebral Cortex, Communication Aids for Disabled, Dominance, Cerebral, Electroencephalography, Epilepsies, Partial, Female, Humans, Imagination, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Motor Cortex, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Software, Somatosensory Cortex, Theta Rhythm, User-Computer Interface, Writing}, issn = {1525-5069}, doi = {10.1016/j.yebeh.2008.03.014}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18495541}, author = {Hinterberger, T. and Widman, Guido and Lal, T.N and Jeremy Jeremy Hill and Tangermann, Michael and Rosenstiel, W. and Sch{\"o}lkopf, B and Elger, Christian and Niels Birbaumer} } @article {3209, title = {Brain-computer interfaces as new brain output pathways.}, journal = {The Journal of physiology}, volume = {579}, year = {2007}, month = {03/2007}, pages = {613{\textendash}619}, abstract = {Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) can provide non-muscular communication and control for people with severe motor disabilities. Current BCIs use a variety of invasive and non-invasive methods to record brain signals and a variety of signal processing methods. Whatever the recording and processing methods used, BCI performance (e.g. the ability of a BCI to control movement of a computer cursor) is highly variable and, by the standards applied to neuromuscular control, could be described as ataxic. In an effort to understand this imperfection, this paper discusses the relevance of two principles that underlie the brain{\textquoteright}s normal motor outputs. The first principle is that motor outputs are normally produced by the combined activity of many CNS areas, from the cortex to the spinal cord. Together, these areas produce appropriate control of the spinal motoneurons that activate muscles. The second principle is that the acquisition and life-long preservation of motor skills depends on continual adaptive plasticity throughout the CNS. This plasticity optimizes the control of spinal motoneurons. In the light of these two principles, a BCI may be viewed as a system that changes the outcome of CNS activity from control of spinal motoneurons to, instead, control of the cortical (or other) area whose signals are used by the BCI to determine the user{\textquoteright}s intent. In essence, a BCI attempts to assign to cortical neurons the role normally performed by spinal motoneurons. Thus, a BCI requires that the many CNS areas involved in producing normal motor actions change their roles so as to optimize the control of cortical neurons rather than spinal motoneurons. The disconcerting variability of BCI performance may stem in large part from the challenge presented by the need for this unnatural adaptation. This difficulty might be reduced, and BCI development might thereby benefit, by adopting a {\textquoteright}goal-selection{\textquoteright} rather than a {\textquoteright}process- control{\textquoteright} strategy. In {\textquoteright}process control{\textquoteright}, a BCI manages all the intricate high-speed interactions involved in movement. In {\textquoteright}goal selection{\textquoteright}, by contrast, the BCI simply communicates the user{\textquoteright}s goal to software that handles the high-speed interactions needed to achieve the goal. Not only is {\textquoteright}goal selection{\textquoteright} less demanding, but also, by delegating lower-level aspects of motor control to another structure (rather than requiring that the cortex do everything), it more closely resembles the distributed operation characteristic of normal motor control.}, keywords = {User-Computer Interface}, issn = {0022-3751}, doi = {10.1113/jphysiol.2006.125948}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17255164}, author = {Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {2181, title = {An MEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI).}, journal = {Neuroimage}, volume = {36}, year = {2007}, month = {07/2007}, pages = {581-93}, abstract = {

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) allow for communicating intentions by mere brain activity, not involving muscles. Thus, BCIs may offer patients who have lost all voluntary muscle control the only possible way to communicate. Many recent studies have demonstrated that BCIs based on\ electroencephalography(EEG) can allow healthy and severely paralyzed individuals to communicate. While this approach is safe and inexpensive, communication is slow. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) provides signals with higher spatiotemporal resolution than\ EEG\ and could thus be used to explore whether these improved signal properties translate into increased BCI communication speed. In this study, we investigated the utility of an MEG-based BCI that uses voluntary amplitude modulation of sensorimotor mu and beta rhythms. To increase the signal-to-noise ratio, we present a simple spatial filtering method that takes the geometric properties of signal propagation in MEG into account, and we present methods that can process artifacts specifically encountered in an MEG-based BCI. Exemplarily, six participants were successfully trained to communicate binary decisions by imagery of limb movements using a feedback paradigm. Participants achieved significant mu rhythm self control within 32 min of feedback training. For a subgroup of three participants, we localized the origin of the amplitude modulated signal to the motor cortex. Our results suggest that an MEG-based BCI is feasible and efficient in terms of user training.

}, keywords = {Adult, Algorithms, Artifacts, Brain, Electroencephalography, Electromagnetic Fields, Electromyography, Feedback, Female, Foot, Hand, Head Movements, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Magnetoencephalography, Male, Movement, Principal Component Analysis, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1053-8119}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.019}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17475511}, author = {Mellinger, J{\"u}rgen and Gerwin Schalk and Christoph Braun and Preissl, Hubert and Rosenstiel, W. and Niels Birbaumer and K{\"u}bler, A.} } @proceedings {2245, title = {Non-invasive brain-computer interface system to operate assistive devices.}, year = {2007}, month = {04/2007}, pages = {2532-5}, abstract = {In this pilot study, a system that allows disabled persons to improve or recover their mobility and communication within the surrounding environment was implemented and validated. The system is based on a software controller that offers to the user a communication interface that is matched with the individual{\textquoteright}s residual motor abilities. Fourteen patients with severe motor disabilities due to progressive neurodegenerative disorders were trained to use the system prototype under a rehabilitation program. All users utilized regular assistive control options (e.g., microswitches or head trackers) while four patients learned to operate the system by means of a non-invasive EEG-based Brain-Computer Interface, based on the subjects{\textquoteright} voluntary modulations of EEG sensorimotor rhythms recorded on the scalp.}, keywords = {Brain, Communication Aids for Disabled, Computer Systems, Humans, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Quality of Life, Self-Help Devices, Software, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1557-170X}, doi = {10.1109/IEMBS.2007.4352844}, author = {Cincotti, F and Aloise, Fabio and Bufalari, Simona and Gerwin Schalk and Oriolo, Giuseppe and Cherubini, Andrea and Davide, Fabrizio and Babiloni, Fabio and Marciani, Maria Grazia and Mattia, Donatella} } @article {2174, title = {A {\textmu}-rhythm Matched Filter for Continuous Control of a Brain-Computer Interface.}, journal = {IEEE Trans Biomed Eng}, volume = {54}, year = {2007}, month = {02/2007}, pages = {273-80}, abstract = {

A brain-computer interface (BCI) is a system that provides an alternate nonmuscular communication/control channel for individuals with severe neuromuscular disabilities. With proper training, individuals can learn to modulate the amplitude of specific electroencephalographic (EEG) components (e.g., the 8-12 Hz mu rhythm and 18-26 Hz beta rhythm) over the sensorimotor cortex and use them to control a cursor on a computer screen. Conventional spectral techniques for monitoring the\ continuousamplitude fluctuations fail to capture essential amplitude/phase relationships of the mu and beta rhythms in a compact fashion and, therefore, are suboptimal. By extracting the characteristic mu rhythm for a user, the exact morphology can be characterized and exploited as a matched filter. A simple, parameterized model for the characteristic mu rhythm is proposed and its effectiveness as a matched filter is examined online for a one-dimensional cursor control task. The results suggest that amplitude/phase coupling exists between the mu and beta bands during event-related desynchronization, and that an appropriate matched filter can provide improved performance.

}, keywords = {Algorithms, Cerebral Cortex, Cortical Synchronization, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Imagination, Pattern Recognition, Automated, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {0018-9294}, doi = {10.1109/TBME.2006.886661}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17278584}, author = {Krusienski, Dean J and Gerwin Schalk and Dennis J. McFarland and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {2172, title = {The BCI competition III: Validating alternative approaches to actual BCI problems.}, journal = {IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng}, volume = {14}, year = {2006}, month = {06/2006}, pages = {153-9}, abstract = {

A\ brain-computer interface\ (BCI) is a system that allows its users to control external devices with\ brainactivity. Although the proof-of-concept was given decades ago, the reliable translation of user intent into device control commands is still a major challenge. Success requires the effective interaction of two adaptive controllers: the user{\textquoteright}s\ brain, which produces\ brain\ activity that encodes intent, and the BCI system, which translates that activity into device control commands. In order to facilitate this interaction, many laboratories are exploring a variety of signal analysis techniques to improve the adaptation of the BCI system to the user. In the literature, many machine learning and pattern classification algorithms have been reported to give impressive results when applied to BCI data in offline analyses. However, it is more difficult to evaluate their relative value for actual\ online\ use. BCI data competitions have been organized to provide objective formal evaluations of alternative methods. Prompted by the great interest in the first two BCI Competitions, we organized the third BCI Competition to address several of the most difficult and important analysis problems in BCI research. The paper describes the data sets that were provided to the competitors and gives an overview of the results.

}, keywords = {Algorithms, Brain, Communication Aids for Disabled, Databases, Factual, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Neuromuscular Diseases, Software Validation, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1534-4320}, doi = {10.1109/TNSRE.2006.875642}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16792282}, author = {Benjamin Blankertz and M{\"u}ller, Klaus-Robert and Krusienski, Dean J and Gerwin Schalk and Jonathan Wolpaw and Schl{\"o}gl, Alois and Pfurtscheller, Gert and Mill{\'a}n, Jos{\'e} del R and Schr{\"o}der, Michael and Niels Birbaumer} } @article {2176, title = {BCI meeting 2005 - Workshop on Technology: Hardware and Software.}, journal = {IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng}, volume = {14}, year = {2006}, month = {06/2006}, pages = {128-31}, abstract = {

This paper describes the outcome of discussions held during the Third International BCI Meeting at a workshop to review and evaluate the current state of BCI-related hardware and software. Technical requirements and current technologies, standardization procedures and future trends are covered. The main conclusion was recognition of the need to focus technical requirements on the users{\textquoteright} needs and the need for consistent standards in BCI research.

}, keywords = {Algorithms, Biotechnology, Brain, Communication Aids for Disabled, Computers, Electroencephalography, Equipment Design, Humans, Internationality, Man-Machine Systems, Neuromuscular Diseases, Software, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1534-4320}, doi = {10.1109/TNSRE.2006.875584}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16792276}, author = {Cincotti, F and Bianchi, L and Birch, Gary and Guger, C and Mellinger, J{\"u}rgen and Scherer, Reinhold and Schmidt, Robert N and Y{\'a}{\~n}ez Su{\'a}rez, Oscar and Gerwin Schalk} } @article {2143, title = {Classifying EEG and ECoG signals without subject training for fast BCI implementation: comparison of nonparalyzed and completely paralyzed subjects.}, journal = {IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng}, volume = {14}, year = {2006}, month = {06/2006}, pages = {183-6}, abstract = {

We summarize results from a series of related studies that aim to develop a motor-imagery-basedbrain-computer interface\ using a single recording session of electroencephalogram (EEG) or electrocorticogram (ECoG) signals for each subject. We apply the same experimental and analytical methods to 11 nonparalysed subjects (eight EEG, three ECoG), and to five paralyzed subjects (four EEG, one ECoG) who had been unable to communicate for some time. While it was relatively easy to obtain classifiable signals quickly from most of the nonparalyzed subjects, it proved impossible to classify the signals obtained from the paralyzed patients by the same methods. This highlights the fact that though certain BCI paradigms may work well with healthy subjects, this does not necessarily indicate success with the target user group. We outline possible reasons for this failure to transfer.

}, keywords = {Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Cluster Analysis, Computer User Training, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Imagination, Male, Middle Aged, Paralysis, Pattern Recognition, Automated, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1534-4320}, doi = {10.1109/TNSRE.2006.875548}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16792289}, author = {Jeremy Jeremy Hill and Lal, T.N and Schr{\"o}der, Michael and Hinterberger, T. and Wilhelm, Barbara and Nijboer, F and Mochty, Ursula and Widman, Guido and Elger, Christian and Sch{\"o}lkopf, B and K{\"u}bler, A. and Niels Birbaumer} } @article {2175, title = {ECoG factors underlying multimodal control of a brain-computer interface.}, journal = {IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng}, volume = {14}, year = {2006}, month = {06/2006}, pages = {246-50}, abstract = {

Most current brain-computer interface (BCI) systems for humans use electroencephalographic activity recorded from the scalp, and may be limited in many ways. Electrocorticography (ECoG) is believed to be a minimally-invasive alternative to electroencephalogram (EEG) for BCI systems, yielding superior signal characteristics that could allow rapid user training and faster communication rates. In addition, our preliminary results suggest that brain regions other than the sensorimotor cortex, such as auditory cortex, may be trained to control a BCI system using similar methods as those used to train motor regions of the brain. This could prove to be vital for users who have neurological disease, head trauma, or other conditions precluding the use of sensorimotor cortex for BCI control.

}, keywords = {Adult, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Communication Aids for Disabled, Computer Peripherals, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Imagination, Male, Man-Machine Systems, Neuromuscular Diseases, Systems Integration, User-Computer Interface, Volition}, issn = {1534-4320}, doi = {10.1109/TNSRE.2006.875570}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16792305}, author = {Adam J Wilson and Felton, Elizabeth A and Garell, P Charles and Gerwin Schalk and Williams, Justin C} } @article {2173, title = {Electrocorticography-based brain computer interface--the Seattle experience.}, journal = {IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng}, volume = {14}, year = {2006}, month = {06/2006}, pages = {194-8}, abstract = {

Electrocorticography (ECoG) has been demonstrated to be an effective modality as a platform for brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). Through our experience with ten subjects, we further demonstrate evidence to support the power and flexibility of this signal for BCI usage. In a subset of four patients, closed-loop BCI experiments were attempted with the patient receiving online feedback that consisted of one-dimensional cursor movement controlled by ECoG features that had shown correlation with various real and imagined motor and speech tasks. All four achieved control, with final target accuracies between 73\%-100\%. We assess the methods for achieving control and the manner in which enhancing online control can be accomplished by rescreening during online tasks. Additionally, we assess the relevant issues of the current experimental paradigm in light of their clinical constraints.

}, keywords = {Cerebral Cortex, Electroencephalography, Epilepsy, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, User-Computer Interface, Washington}, issn = {1534-4320}, doi = {10.1109/TNSRE.2006.875536}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16792292}, author = {Leuthardt, E C and Miller, John W and Gerwin Schalk and Rao, Rajesh P N and Ojemann, J G} } @article {2178, title = {The emerging world of motor neuroprosthetics: a neurosurgical perspective.}, journal = {Neurosurgery}, volume = {59}, year = {2006}, month = {07/2006}, pages = {1-14; discussion 1-14}, abstract = {

A MOTOR NEUROPROSTHETIC device, or\ brain computer interface, is a machine that can take some type of signal from the\ brain\ and convert that information into overt device control such that it reflects the intentions of the user{\textquoteright}s\ brain. In essence, these constructs can decode the electrophysiological signals representing motor intent. With the parallel evolution of neuroscience, engineering, and rapid computing, the era of clinical neuroprosthetics is approaching as a practical reality for people with severe motor impairment. Patients with such diseases as spinal cord injury, stroke, limb loss, and neuromuscular disorders may benefit through the implantation of these\ brain computer interfaces\ that serve to augment their ability to communicate and interact with their environment. In the upcoming years, it will be important for the neurosurgeon to understand what a\ brain computer interface\ is, its fundamental principle of operation, and what the salient surgical issues are when considering implantation. We review the current state of the field of motor neuroprosthetics research, the early clinical applications, and the essential considerations from a neurosurgical perspective for the future.

}, keywords = {Brain, Humans, Man-Machine Systems, Movement, Neurosurgery, Prostheses and Implants, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1524-4040}, doi = {10.1227/01.NEU.0000221506.06947.AC}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16823294}, author = {Leuthardt, E C and Gerwin Schalk and Moran, D and Ojemann, J G} } @article {3202, title = {An evaluation of autoregressive spectral estimation model order for brain-computer interface applications.}, journal = {Conference proceedings : ... Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Conference}, volume = {1}, year = {2006}, month = {09/2006}, pages = {1323{\textendash}1326}, abstract = {Autoregressive (AR) spectral estimation is a popular method for modeling the electroencephalogram (EEG), and therefore the frequency domain EEG phenomena that are used for control of a brain-computer interface (BCI). Several studies have been conducted to evaluate the optimal AR model order for EEG, but the criteria used in these studies does not necessarily equate to the optimal AR model order for sensorimotor rhythm (SMR)-based BCI control applications. The present study confirms this by evaluating the EEG spectra of data obtained during control of SMR-BCI using different AR model orders and model evaluation criteria. The results indicate that the AR model order that optimizes SMR-BCI control performance is generally higher than the model orders that are frequently used in SMR-BCI studies.}, keywords = {User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1557-170X}, doi = {10.1109/IEMBS.2006.259822}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17946038}, author = {Krusienski, D. J. and Dennis J. McFarland and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {2153, title = {Multi-channel linear descriptors for event-related EEG collected in brain computer interface.}, journal = {J Neural Eng}, volume = {3}, year = {2006}, month = {03/2006}, pages = {52-8}, abstract = {

By three multi-channel linear descriptors, i.e. spatial\ complexity\ (omega), field power (sigma) and frequency of field changes (phi),\ event-relatedEEGdata\ within 8-30 Hz were investigated during imagination of left or right hand movement. Studies on the\ event-relatedEEGdata\ indicate that a two-channel version of omega, sigma and phi could reflect the antagonistic ERD/ERS patterns over contralateral and ipsilateral areas and also characterize different phases of the changing brain states in the\ event-related\ paradigm. Based on the selective two-channel linear descriptors, the left and right hand motor imagery tasks are classified to obtain satisfactory results, which testify the validity of the three linear descriptors omega, sigma and phi for characterizing\ event-relatedEEG. The preliminary results show that omega, sigma together with phi have good separability for left and right hand motor imagery tasks, which could be considered for classification of two classes of\ EEG\ patterns in the application of brain computer interfaces.

}, keywords = {Algorithms, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Motor, Humans, Imagination, Motor Cortex, Movement, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1741-2560}, doi = {10.1088/1741-2560/3/1/006}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16510942}, author = {Pei, Xiao-Mei and Zheng, Shi Dong and Xu, Jin and Bin, Guang-yu and Zuoguan Wang} } @article {3217, title = {The Third International Meeting on Brain-Computer Interface Technology: making a difference.}, journal = {IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society}, volume = {14}, year = {2006}, month = {06/2006}, pages = {126{\textendash}127}, abstract = {This special issue of the IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL SYSTEMS AND REHABILITATION ENGINEERING provides a representative and comprehensive bird{\textquoteright}s-eye view of the most recent developments in brain-computer interface (BCI) technology from laboratories around the world. The 30 research communications and papers are the direct outcome of the Third International Meeting on Brain-Computer Interface Technology held at the Rensselaerville Institute, Rensselaerville, NY, in June 2005. Fifty-three research groups from North and South America, Europe, and Asia, representing the majority of all the existing BCI laboratories around the world, participated in this highly focused meeting sponsored by the National Institutes of Health and organized by the BCI Laboratory of the Wadsworth Center of the New York State Department of Health. As demonstrated by the papers in this special issue, the rapid advances in BCI research and development make this technology capable of providing communication and control to people severely disabled by amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), brainstem stroke, cerebral palsy, and other neuromuscular disorders. Future work is expected to improve the performance and utility of BCIs, and to focus increasingly on making them a viable, practical, and affordable communication alternative for many thousands of severely disabled people worldwide.}, keywords = {User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1534-4320}, doi = {10.1109/TNSRE.2006.875649}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16792275}, author = {Theresa M Vaughan and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {2177, title = {The Wadsworth BCI Research and Development Program: At Home with BCI.}, journal = {IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng}, volume = {14}, year = {2006}, month = {06/2006}, pages = {229-33}, abstract = {

The ultimate goal of brain-computer interface (BCI) technology is to provide communication and control capacities to people with severe motor disabilities. BCI research at the Wadsworth Center focuses primarily on noninvasive,\ electroencephalography\ (EEG)-based BCI methods. We have shown that people, including those with severe motor disabilities, can learn to use sensorimotor rhythms (SMRs) to move a cursor rapidly and accurately in one or two dimensions. We have also improved P300-based BCI operation. We are now translating this laboratory-proven BCI technology into a system that can be used by severely disabled people in their homes with minimal ongoing technical oversight. To accomplish this, we have: improved our general-purpose BCI software (BCI2000); improved online adaptation and feature translation for SMR-based BCI operation; improved the accuracy and bandwidth of P300-based BCI operation; reduced the\ complexity\ of system hardware and software and begun to evaluate home system use in appropriate users. These developments have resulted in prototype systems for every day use in people{\textquoteright}s homes.

}, keywords = {Animals, Brain, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Neuromuscular Diseases, New York, Research, Switzerland, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Universities, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1534-4320}, doi = {10.1109/TNSRE.2006.875577}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16792301}, author = {Theresa M Vaughan and Dennis J. McFarland and Gerwin Schalk and Sarnacki, William A and Krusienski, Dean J and Sellers, Eric W and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {2169, title = {Patients with ALS can use sensorimotor rhythms to operate a brain-computer interface.}, journal = {Neurology}, volume = {64}, year = {2005}, month = {05/2005}, pages = {1775-7}, abstract = {

People with severe motor disabilities can maintain an acceptable quality of life if they can communicate.\ Brain-computer interfaces\ (BCIs), which do not depend on muscle control, can provide communication. Four people severely disabled by ALS learned to operate a BCI with EEG rhythms recorded over sensorimotor cortex. These results suggest that a sensorimotor rhythm-based\ BCI could help maintain quality of life for people with ALS.

}, keywords = {Aged, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Motor, Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory, Female, Humans, Imagination, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Cortex, Movement, Paralysis, Photic Stimulation, Prostheses and Implants, Somatosensory Cortex, Treatment Outcome, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1526-632X}, doi = {10.1212/01.WNL.0000158616.43002.6D}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15911809}, author = {K{\"u}bler, A. and Nijboer, F and Mellinger, J{\"u}rgen and Theresa M Vaughan and Pawelzik, H and Gerwin Schalk and Dennis J. McFarland and Niels Birbaumer and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {3220, title = {Patients with ALS can use sensorimotor rhythms to operate a brain-computer interface.}, journal = {Neurology}, volume = {64}, year = {2005}, month = {05/2005}, pages = {1775{\textendash}1777}, abstract = {People with severe motor disabilities can maintain an acceptable quality of life if they can communicate. Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), which do not depend on muscle control, can provide communication. Four people severely disabled by ALS learned to operate a BCI with EEG rhythms recorded over sensorimotor cortex. These results suggest that a sensorimotor rhythm-based BCI could help maintain quality of life for people with ALS.}, keywords = {User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1526-632X}, doi = {10.1212/01.WNL.0000158616.43002.6D}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15911809}, author = {K{\"u}bler, A. and Nijboer, F. and Mellinger, J. and Theresa M Vaughan and Pawelzik, H. and Gerwin Schalk and Dennis J. McFarland and Niels Birbaumer and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {2167, title = {The BCI Competition 2003: Progress and perspectives in detection and discrimination of EEG single trials.}, journal = {IEEE Trans Biomed Eng}, volume = {51}, year = {2004}, month = {06/2004}, pages = {1044-51}, abstract = {Interest in developing a new method of man-to-machine communication--a brain-computer interface (BCI)--has grown steadily over the past few decades. BCIs create a new communication channel between the brain and an output device by bypassing conventional motor output pathways of nerves and muscles. These systems use signals recorded from the scalp, the surface of the cortex, or from inside the brain to enable users to control a variety of applications including simple word-processing software and orthotics. BCI technology could therefore provide a new communication and control option for individuals who cannot otherwise express their wishes to the outside world. Signal processing and classification methods are essential tools in the development of improved BCI technology. We organized the BCI Competition 2003 to evaluate the current state of the art of these tools. Four laboratories well versed in EEG-based BCI research provided six data sets in a documented format. We made these data sets (i.e., labeled training sets and unlabeled test sets) and their descriptions available on the Internet. The goal in the competition was to maximize the performance measure for the test labels. Researchers worldwide tested their algorithms and competed for the best classification results. This paper describes the six data sets and the results and function of the most successful algorithms.}, keywords = {Adult, Algorithms, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Artificial Intelligence, Brain, Cognition, Databases, Factual, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {0018-9294}, doi = {10.1109/TBME.2004.826692}, author = {Benjamin Blankertz and M{\"u}ller, Klaus-Robert and Curio, Gabriel and Theresa M Vaughan and Gerwin Schalk and Jonathan Wolpaw and Schl{\"o}gl, Alois and Neuper, Christa and Pfurtscheller, Gert and Hinterberger, T. and Schr{\"o}der, Michael and Niels Birbaumer} } @article {2166, title = {BCI2000: a general-purpose brain-computer interface (BCI) system.}, journal = {IEEE Trans Biomed Eng}, volume = {51}, year = {2004}, month = {06/2004}, pages = {1034-43}, abstract = {Many laboratories have begun to develop brain-computer interface (BCI) systems that provide communication and control capabilities to people with severe motor disabilities. Further progress and realization of practical applications depends on systematic evaluations and comparisons of different brain signals, recording methods, processing algorithms, output formats, and operating protocols. However, the typical BCI system is designed specifically for one particular BCI method and is, therefore, not suited to the systematic studies that are essential for continued progress. In response to this problem, we have developed a documented general-purpose BCI research and development platform called BCI2000. BCI2000 can incorporate alone or in combination any brain signals, signal processing methods, output devices, and operating protocols. This report is intended to describe to investigators, biomedical engineers, and computer scientists the concepts that the BC12000 system is based upon and gives examples of successful BCI implementations using this system. To date, we have used BCI2000 to create BCI systems for a variety of brain signals, processing methods, and applications. The data show that these systems function well in online operation and that BCI2000 satisfies the stringent real-time requirements of BCI systems. By substantially reducing labor and cost, BCI2000 facilitates the implementation of different BCI systems and other psychophysiological experiments. It is available with full documentation and free of charge for research or educational purposes and is currently being used in a variety of studies by many research groups.}, keywords = {Algorithms, Brain, Cognition, Communication Aids for Disabled, Computer Peripherals, Electroencephalography, Equipment Design, Equipment Failure Analysis, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Systems Integration, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {0018-9294}, doi = {10.1109/TBME.2004.827072}, author = {Gerwin Schalk and Dennis J. McFarland and Hinterberger, T. and Niels Birbaumer and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {3223, title = {BCI2000: a general-purpose brain-computer interface (BCI) system.}, journal = {IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering}, volume = {51}, year = {2004}, month = {06/2004}, pages = {1034{\textendash}1043}, abstract = {Many laboratories have begun to develop brain-computer interface (BCI) systems that provide communication and control capabilities to people with severe motor disabilities. Further progress and realization of practical applications depends on systematic evaluations and comparisons of different brain signals, recording methods, processing algorithms, output formats, and operating protocols. However, the typical BCI system is designed specifically for one particular BCI method and is, therefore, not suited to the systematic studies that are essential for continued progress. In response to this problem, we have developed a documented general-purpose BCI research and development platform called BCI2000. BCI2000 can incorporate alone or in combination any brain signals, signal processing methods, output devices, and operating protocols. This report is intended to describe to investigators, biomedical engineers, and computer scientists the concepts that the BC12000 system is based upon and gives examples of successful BCI implementations using this system. To date, we have used BCI2000 to create BCI systems for a variety of brain signals, processing methods, and applications. The data show that these systems function well in online operation and that BCI2000 satisfies the stringent real-time requirements of BCI systems. By substantially reducing labor and cost, BCI2000 facilitates the implementation of different BCI systems and other psychophysiological experiments. It is available with full documentation and free of charge for research or educational purposes and is currently being used in a variety of studies by many research groups.}, keywords = {User-Computer Interface}, issn = {0018-9294}, doi = {10.1109/TBME.2004.827072}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15188875}, author = {Gerwin Schalk and Dennis J. McFarland and Hinterberger, Thilo and Niels Birbaumer and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {2168, title = {A brain-computer interface using electrocorticographic signals in humans.}, journal = {J Neural Eng}, volume = {1}, year = {2004}, month = {06/2004}, pages = {63-71}, abstract = {

Brain-computer interfaces\ (BCIs) enable users to control devices with electroencephalographic (EEG) activity from the scalp or with single-neuron activity from within the\ brain. Both methods have disadvantages: EEG has limited resolution and requires extensive training, while single-neuron recording entails significant clinical risks and has limited stability. We demonstrate here for the first time that electrocorticographic (ECoG) activity recorded from the surface of the\ brain\ can enable users to control a one-dimensional\ computer\ cursor rapidly and accurately. We first identified ECoG signals that were associated with different types of motor and speech imagery. Over brief training periods of 3-24 min, four patients then used these signals to master closed-loop control and to achieve success rates of 74-100\% in a one-dimensional binary task. In additional open-loop experiments, we found that ECoG signals at frequencies up to 180 Hz encoded substantial information about the direction of two-dimensional joystick movements. Our results suggest that an ECoG-based BCI could provide for people with severe motor disabilities a non-muscular communication and control option that is more powerful than EEG-based BCIs and is potentially more stable and less traumatic than BCIs that use electrodes penetrating the\ brain.

}, keywords = {Adult, Brain, Communication Aids for Disabled, Computer Peripherals, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Electrodes, Implanted, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Imagination, Male, Movement Disorders, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1741-2560}, doi = {10.1088/1741-2560/1/2/001}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15876624}, author = {Leuthardt, E C and Gerwin Schalk and Jonathan Wolpaw and Ojemann, J G and Moran, D} } @article {2165, title = {The Wadsworth Center brain-computer interface (BCI) research and development program.}, journal = {IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng}, volume = {11}, year = {2003}, month = {06/2003}, pages = {204-7}, abstract = {

Brain-computer interface (BCI) research at the Wadsworth Center has focused primarily on using electroencephalogram (EEG) rhythms recorded from the scalp over sensorimotor cortex to\ control\ cursor movement in one or two dimensions. Recent and current studies seek to improve the speed and accuracy of this\ control\ by improving the selection of signal features and their translation into device commands, by incorporating additional signal features, and by optimizing the adaptive interaction between the user and system. In addition, to facilitate the evaluation, comparison, and combination of alternative BCI methods, we have developed a general-purpose BCI system called BCI-2000 and have made it available to other research\ groups. Finally, in collaboration with several other\ groups, we are developing simple BCI applications and are testing their practicality and long-term value for people with severe motor disabilities.

}, keywords = {Academic Medical Centers, Adult, Algorithms, Artifacts, Brain, Brain Mapping, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Feedback, Humans, Middle Aged, Nervous System Diseases, Research, Research Design, User-Computer Interface, Visual Perception}, issn = {1534-4320}, doi = {10.1109/TNSRE.2003.814442}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12899275}, author = {Jonathan Wolpaw and Dennis J. McFarland and Theresa M Vaughan and Gerwin Schalk} } @article {2268, title = {Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control.}, journal = {Clin Neurophysiol}, volume = {113}, year = {2002}, month = {06/2002}, pages = {767-91}, abstract = {

For many years people have speculated that electroencephalographic activity or other electrophysiological measures of brain function might provide a new non-muscular channel for sending messages and commands to the external world - a brain-computer interface (BCI). Over the past 15 years, productive BCI research programs have arisen. Encouraged by new understanding of brain function, by the advent of powerful low-cost computer equipment, and by growing recognition of the needs and potentials of people with disabilities, these programs concentrate on developing new augmentative communication and\ controltechnology for those with severe neuromuscular disorders, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, brainstem stroke, and spinal cord injury. The immediate goal is to provide these users, who may be completely paralyzed, or {\textquoteright}locked in{\textquoteright}, with basic communication capabilities so that they can express their wishes to caregivers or even operate word processing programs or neuroprostheses. Present-day BCIs determine the intent of the user from a variety of different electrophysiological signals. These signals include slow cortical potentials, P300 potentials, and mu or beta rhythms recorded from the scalp, and cortical neuronal activity recorded by implanted electrodes. They are translated in real-time into commands that operate a computer display or other device. Successful operation requires that the user encode commands in these signals and that the BCI derive the commands from the signals. Thus, the user and the BCI system need to adapt to each other both initially and continually so as to ensure stable performance. Current BCIs have maximum information transfer rates up to 10-25bits/min. This limited capacity can be valuable for people whose severe disabilities prevent them from using conventional augmentative communication methods. At the same time, many possible applications of BCI technology, such as neuroprosthesis\ control, may require higher information transfer rates. Future progress will depend on: recognition that BCI research and development is an interdisciplinary problem, involving neurobiology, psychology, engineering, mathematics, and computer science; identification of those signals, whether evoked potentials, spontaneous rhythms, or neuronal firing rates, that users are best able to\ control\ independent of activity in conventional motor output pathways; development of training methods for helping users to gain and maintain that\ control; delineation of the best algorithms for translating these signals into device commands; attention to the identification and elimination of artifacts such as electromyographic and electro-oculographic activity; adoption of precise and objective procedures for evaluating BCI performance; recognition of the need for long-term as well as short-term assessment of BCI performance; identification of appropriate BCI applications and appropriate matching of applications and users; and attention to factors that affect user acceptance of augmentative technology, including ease of use, cosmesis, and provision of those communication and\ control\ capacities that are most important to the user. Development of BCI technology will also benefit from greater emphasis on peer-reviewed research publications and avoidance of the hyperbolic and often misleading media attention that tends to generate unrealistic expectations in the public and skepticism in other researchers. With adequate recognition and effective engagement of all these issues, BCI systems could eventually provide an important new communication and\ control\ option for those with motor disabilities and might also give those without disabilities a supplementary\ control\ channel or a\ control\ channel useful in special circumstances.

}, keywords = {Brain Diseases, Communication Aids for Disabled, Computer Systems, Electroencephalography, Humans, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1388-2457}, doi = {10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00057-3}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12048038}, author = {Jonathan Wolpaw and Niels Birbaumer and Dennis J. McFarland and Pfurtscheller, Gert and Theresa M Vaughan} } @article {3230, title = {Brain-computer communication: unlocking the locked in.}, journal = {Psychological bulletin}, volume = {127}, year = {2001}, month = {05/2001}, pages = {358{\textendash}375}, abstract = {With the increasing efficiency of life-support systems and better intensive care, more patients survive severe injuries of the brain and spinal cord. Many of these patients experience locked-in syndrome: The active mind is locked in a paralyzed body. Consequently, communication is extremely restricted or impossible. A muscle-independent communication channel overcomes this problem and is realized through a brain-computer interface, a direct connection between brain and computer. The number of technically elaborated brain-computer interfaces is in contrast with the number of systems used in the daily life of locked-in patients. It is hypothesized that a profound knowledge and consideration of psychological principles are necessary to make brain-computer interfaces feasible for locked-in patients.}, keywords = {User-Computer Interface}, issn = {0033-2909}, doi = {10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.358}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11393301}, author = {K{\"u}bler, A. and Kotchoubey, B. and Kaiser, J. and Jonathan Wolpaw and Niels Birbaumer} } @article {3235, title = {Brain-computer interface research at the Wadsworth Center.}, journal = {IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society}, volume = {8}, year = {2000}, month = {06/2000}, pages = {222{\textendash}226}, abstract = {Studies at the Wadsworth Center over the past 14 years have shown that people with or without motor disabilities can learn to control the amplitude of mu or beta rhythms in electroencephalographic (EEG) activity recorded from the scalp over sensorimotor cortex and can use that control to move a cursor on a computer screen in one or two dimensions. This EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI) could provide a new augmentative communication technology for those who are totally paralyzed or have other severe motor impairments. Present research focuses on improving the speed and accuracy of BCI communication.}, keywords = {User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1063-6528}, doi = {10.1109/86.847823}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10896194}, author = {Jonathan Wolpaw and Dennis J. McFarland and Theresa M Vaughan} } @article {2163, title = {Brain-computer interface technology: a review of the first international meeting.}, journal = {IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng}, volume = {8}, year = {2000}, month = {06/2000}, pages = {164-73}, abstract = {

Over the past decade, many laboratories have begun to explore brain-computer interface (BCI) technology as a radically new communication option for those with neuromuscular impairments that prevent them from using conventional augmentative communication methods. BCI{\textquoteright}s provide these users with communication channels that do not depend on peripheral nerves and muscles. This article summarizes the first international meeting devoted to BCI research and development. Current BCI{\textquoteright}s use electroencephalographic (EEG) activity recorded at the scalp or single-unit activity recorded from within cortex to control cursor movement, select letters or icons, or operate a neuroprosthesis. The central element in each BCI is a translation algorithm that converts electrophysiological input from the user into output that controls external devices. BCI operation depends on effective interaction between two adaptive controllers, the user who encodes his or her commands in the electrophysiological input provided to the BCI, and the BCI which recognizes the commands contained in the input and expresses them in device control. Current BCI{\textquoteright}s have maximum information transfer rates of 5-25 b/min. Achievement of greater speed and accuracy depends on improvements in signal processing, translation algorithms, and user training. These improvements depend on increased interdisciplinary cooperation between neuroscientists, engineers, computer programmers, psychologists, and rehabilitation specialists, and on adoption and widespread application of objective methods for evaluating alternative methods. The practical use of BCI technology depends on the development of appropriate applications, identification of appropriate user groups, and careful attention to the needs and desires of individual users. BCI research and development will also benefit from greater emphasis on peer-reviewed publications, and from adoption of standard venues for presentations and discussion.

}, keywords = {Algorithms, Cerebral Cortex, Communication Aids for Disabled, Disabled Persons, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Neuromuscular Diseases, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1063-6528}, doi = {10.1109/TRE.2000.847807}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10896178}, author = {Jonathan Wolpaw and Niels Birbaumer and Heetderks, W J and Dennis J. McFarland and Peckham, P H and Gerwin Schalk and Emanuel Donchin and Quatrano, L A and Robinson, C J and Theresa M Vaughan} } @article {3243, title = {Answering questions with an electroencephalogram-based brain-computer interface.}, journal = {Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation}, volume = {79}, year = {1998}, month = {09/1998}, pages = {1029{\textendash}1033}, abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that humans can learn to control selected electroencephalographic components and use that control to answer simple questions. METHODS: Four adults (one with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) learned to use electroencephalogram (EEG) mu rhythm (8 to 12Hz) or beta rhythm (18 to 25Hz) activity over sensorimotor cortex to control vertical cursor movement to targets at the top or bottom edge of a video screen. In subsequent sessions, the targets were replaced with the words YES and NO, and individuals used the cursor to answer spoken YES/NO questions from single- or multiple-topic question sets. They confirmed their answers through the response verification (RV) procedure, in which the word positions were switched and the question was answered again. RESULTS: For 5 consecutive sessions after initial question training, individuals were asked an average of 4.0 to 4.6 questions per minute; 64\% to 87\% of their answers were confirmed by the RV procedure and 93\% to 99\% of these answers were correct. Performances for single- and multiple-topic question sets did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that (1) EEG-based cursor control can be used to answer simple questions with a high degree of accuracy, (2) attention to auditory queries and formulation of answers does not interfere with EEG-based cursor control, (3) question complexity (at least as represented by single versus multiple-topic question sets) does not noticeably affect performance, and (4) the RV procedure improves accuracy as expected. Several options for increasing the speed of communication appear promising. An EEG-based brain-computer interface could provide a new communication and control modality for people with severe motor disabilities.}, keywords = {User-Computer Interface}, issn = {0003-9993}, doi = {10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90165-4}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9749678}, author = {Miner, L. A. and Dennis J. McFarland and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {3256, title = {EEG-based brain computer interface (BCI). Search for optimal electrode positions and frequency components.}, journal = {Medical progress through technology}, volume = {21}, year = {1995}, month = {1996}, pages = {111{\textendash}121}, abstract = {Several laboratories around the world have recently started to investigate EEG-based brain computer interface (BCI) systems in order to create a new communication channel for subjects with severe motor impairments. The present paper describes an initial evaluation of 64-channel EEG data recorded while subjects used one EEG channel over the left sensorimotor area to control on-line vertical cursor movement. Targets were given at the top or bottom of a computer screen. Data from 3 subjects in the early stages of training were analyzed by calculating band power time courses and maps for top and bottom targets separately. In addition, the Distinction Sensitive Learning Vector Quantizer (DSLVQ) was applied to single-trial EEG data. It was found that for each subject there exist optimal electrode positions and frequency components for on-line EEG-based cursor control.}, keywords = {User-Computer Interface}, issn = {0047-6552}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8776708}, author = {Pfurtscheller, G. and Flotzinger, D. and Pregenzer, M. and Jonathan Wolpaw and Dennis J. McFarland} }