@article {4448, title = {Passive functional mapping of receptive language cortex during general anesthesia using electrocorticography.}, journal = {Clin Neurophysiol}, volume = {147}, year = {2023}, month = {03/2023}, pages = {31-44}, abstract = {

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility of passive functional mapping in the receptive language cortex during general anesthesia using electrocorticographic (ECoG) signals.

METHODS: We used subdurally placed ECoG grids to record cortical responses to speech stimuli during awake and anesthesia conditions. We identified the cortical areas with significant responses to the stimuli using the spectro-temporal consistency of the brain signal in the broadband gamma (BBG) frequency band (70-170~Hz).

RESULTS: We found that ECoG BBG responses during general anesthesia effectively identify cortical regions associated with receptive language function. Our analyses demonstrated that the ability to identify receptive language cortex varies across different states and depths of anesthesia. We confirmed these results by comparing them to receptive language areas identified during the awake condition. Quantification of these results demonstrated an average sensitivity and specificity of passive language mapping during general anesthesia to be 49{\textpm}7.7\% and 100\%, respectively.

CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that mapping receptive language cortex in patients during general anesthesia is feasible.

SIGNIFICANCE: Our proposed protocol could greatly expand the population of patients that can benefit from passive language mapping techniques, and could eliminate the risks associated with electrocortical stimulation during an awake craniotomy.

}, keywords = {Anesthesia, General, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Electrocorticography, Humans, Language}, issn = {1872-8952}, doi = {10.1016/j.clinph.2022.11.021}, author = {Nourmohammadi, Amin and Swift, James R and de Pesters, Adriana and Guay, Christian S and Adamo, Matthew A and Dalfino, John C and Ritaccio, Anthony L and Schalk, Gerwin and Brunner, Peter} } @article {4335, title = {Within-subject reaction time variability: Role of cortical networks and underlying neurophysiological mechanisms.}, journal = {Neuroimage}, volume = {237}, year = {2021}, month = {08/2021}, pages = {118127}, abstract = {

Variations in reaction time are a ubiquitous characteristic of human behavior. Extensively documented, they have been successfully modeled using parameters of the subject or the task, but the neural basis of behavioral reaction time that varies within the same subject and the same task has been minimally studied. In this paper, we investigate behavioral reaction time variance using 28 datasets of direct cortical recordings in humans who engaged in four different types of simple sensory-motor reaction time tasks. Using a previously described technique that can identify the onset of population-level cortical activity and a novel functional connectivity algorithm described herein, we show that the cumulative latency difference of population-level neural activity across the task-related cortical network can explain up to 41\% of the trial-by-trial variance in reaction time. Furthermore, we show that reaction time variance may primarily be due to the latencies in specific brain regions and demonstrate that behavioral latency variance is accumulated across the whole task-related cortical network. Our results suggest that population-level neural activity monotonically increases prior to movement execution, and that trial-by-trial changes in that increase are, in part, accounted for by inhibitory activity indexed by low-frequency oscillations. This pre-movement neural activity explains 19\% of the measured variance in neural latencies in our data. Thus, our study provides a mechanistic explanation for a sizable fraction of behavioral reaction time when the subject{\textquoteright}s task is the same from trial to trial.

}, keywords = {Adult, Algorithms, Alpha Rhythm, Cerebral Cortex, Connectome, Electrocorticography, Female, Gamma Rhythm, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nerve Net, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Young Adult}, issn = {1095-9572}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118127}, author = {Paraskevopoulou, Sivylla E and Coon, William G and Peter Brunner and Miller, Kai J and Schalk, Gerwin} }