@article {4567, title = {IpsiHand Brain-Computer Interface Therapy Induces Broad Upper Extremity Motor Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke.}, journal = {Neurorehabil Neural Repair}, volume = {39}, year = {2025}, month = {2025 Jan}, pages = {74-86}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Chronic hemiparetic stroke patients have very limited benefits from current therapies. Brain-computer interface (BCI) engaging the unaffected hemisphere has emerged as a promising novel therapeutic approach for chronic stroke rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the effectiveness of contralesionally-controlled BCI therapy in chronic stroke patients with impaired upper extremity motor function. We further explored neurophysiological features of motor recovery driven by BCI. We hypothesized that BCI therapy would induce a broad motor recovery in the upper extremity, and there would be corresponding changes in baseline theta and gamma oscillations, which have been shown to be associated with motor recovery.

METHODS: Twenty-six prospectively enrolled chronic hemiparetic stroke patients performed a therapeutic BCI task for 12 weeks. Motor function assessment data and resting state electroencephalogram signals were acquired before initiating BCI therapy and across BCI therapy sessions. The Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer assessment served as a primary motor outcome assessment tool. Theta-gamma cross-frequency coupling (CFC) was computed and correlated with motor recovery.

RESULTS: Chronic stroke patients achieved significant motor improvement in both proximal and distal upper extremity with BCI therapy. Motor function improvement was independent of Botox application. Theta-gamma CFC enhanced bilaterally over the C3/C4 motor electrodes and positively correlated with motor recovery across BCI therapy sessions.

CONCLUSIONS: BCI therapy resulted in significant motor function improvement across the proximal and distal upper extremities of patients, which significantly correlated with theta-gamma CFC increases in the motor regions. This may represent rhythm-specific cortical oscillatory mechanism for BCI-driven rehabilitation in chronic stroke patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: Advarra Study: https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04338971 and Washington University Study: https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03611855.

}, keywords = {Adult, Aged, brain-computer interfaces, Chronic Disease, Electroencephalography, Female, Gamma Rhythm, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Paresis, Prospective Studies, Recovery of Function, Stroke, Stroke Rehabilitation, Theta Rhythm, Upper Extremity}, issn = {1552-6844}, doi = {10.1177/15459683241287731}, author = {Rustamov, Nabi and Souders, Lauren and Sheehan, Lauren and Carter, Alexandre and Leuthardt, Eric C} } @article {4335, title = {Within-subject reaction time variability: Role of cortical networks and underlying neurophysiological mechanisms.}, journal = {Neuroimage}, volume = {237}, year = {2021}, month = {08/2021}, pages = {118127}, abstract = {

Variations in reaction time are a ubiquitous characteristic of human behavior. Extensively documented, they have been successfully modeled using parameters of the subject or the task, but the neural basis of behavioral reaction time that varies within the same subject and the same task has been minimally studied. In this paper, we investigate behavioral reaction time variance using 28 datasets of direct cortical recordings in humans who engaged in four different types of simple sensory-motor reaction time tasks. Using a previously described technique that can identify the onset of population-level cortical activity and a novel functional connectivity algorithm described herein, we show that the cumulative latency difference of population-level neural activity across the task-related cortical network can explain up to 41\% of the trial-by-trial variance in reaction time. Furthermore, we show that reaction time variance may primarily be due to the latencies in specific brain regions and demonstrate that behavioral latency variance is accumulated across the whole task-related cortical network. Our results suggest that population-level neural activity monotonically increases prior to movement execution, and that trial-by-trial changes in that increase are, in part, accounted for by inhibitory activity indexed by low-frequency oscillations. This pre-movement neural activity explains 19\% of the measured variance in neural latencies in our data. Thus, our study provides a mechanistic explanation for a sizable fraction of behavioral reaction time when the subject{\textquoteright}s task is the same from trial to trial.

}, keywords = {Adult, Algorithms, Alpha Rhythm, Cerebral Cortex, Connectome, Electrocorticography, Female, Gamma Rhythm, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nerve Net, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Young Adult}, issn = {1095-9572}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118127}, author = {Paraskevopoulou, Sivylla E and Coon, William G and Peter Brunner and Miller, Kai J and Schalk, Gerwin} }