@article {4566,
	title = {The development of aperiodic neural activity in the human brain.},
	journal = {bioRxiv},
	year = {2024},
	month = {2024 Nov 09},
	abstract = {<p>The neurophysiological mechanisms supporting brain maturation are fundamental to attention and memory capacity across the lifespan. Human brain regions develop at different rates, with many regions developing into the third and fourth decades of life. Here, in this preregistered study (https://osf.io/gsru7), we analyzed intracranial EEG (iEEG) recordings from widespread brain regions in a large developmental cohort. Using task-based (i.e., attention to-be-remembered visual stimuli) and task-free (resting-state) data from 101 children and adults (5.93 - 54.00 years, 63 males;  electrodes = 5691), we mapped aperiodic (1/{\textflorin}-like) activity, a proxy of excitation:inhibition (E:I) balance with steeper slopes indexing inhibition and flatter slopes indexing excitation. We reveal that aperiodic slopes flatten with age into young adulthood in both association and sensorimotor cortices, challenging models of early sensorimotor development based on brain structure. In prefrontal cortex (PFC), attentional state modulated age effects, revealing steeper task-based than task-free slopes in adults and the opposite in children, consistent with the development of cognitive control. Age-related differences in task-based slopes also explained age-related gains in memory performance, linking the development of PFC cognitive control to the development of memory. Last, with additional structural imaging measures, we reveal that age-related differences in gray matter volume are differentially associated with aperiodic slopes in association and sensorimotor cortices. Our findings establish developmental trajectories of aperiodic activity in localized brain regions and illuminate the development of PFC inhibitory control during adolescence in the development of attention and memory.</p>},
	issn = {2692-8205},
	doi = {10.1101/2024.11.08.622714},
	author = {Cross, Zachariah R and Gray, Samantha M and Dede, Adam J O and Rivera, Yessenia M and Yin, Qin and Vahidi, Parisa and Rau, Elias M B and Cyr, Christopher and Holubecki, Ania M and Asano, Eishi and Lin, Jack J and McManus, Olivia Kim and Sattar, Shifteh and Saez, Ignacio and Girgis, Fady and King-Stephens, David and Weber, Peter B and Laxer, Kenneth D and Schuele, Stephan U and Rosenow, Joshua M and Wu, Joyce Y and Lam, Sandi K and Raskin, Jeffrey S and Chang, Edward F and Shaikhouni, Ammar and Brunner, Peter and Roland, Jarod L and Braga, Rodrigo M and Knight, Robert T and Ofen, Noa and Johnson, Elizabeth L}
}
@article {4459,
	title = {A somato-cognitive action network alternates with effector regions in motor cortex.},
	journal = {Nature},
	volume = {617},
	year = {2023},
	month = {05/2023},
	pages = {351-359},
	abstract = {<p>Motor cortex (M1) has been thought to form a continuous somatotopic homunculus extending down~the precentral gyrus from foot to face representations, despite evidence for concentric functional zones and maps of complex actions. Here, using precision functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) methods, we find that the classic homunculus is interrupted by regions with distinct connectivity, structure and function, alternating with effector-specific (foot, hand and mouth) areas. These inter-effector regions exhibit decreased cortical thickness and strong functional connectivity to each other, as well as to the cingulo-opercular network (CON), critical for action and physiological control, arousal, errors and pain. This interdigitation of action control-linked and motor effector regions was verified in the three largest fMRI datasets. Macaque and pediatric (newborn, infant and child) precision fMRI suggested cross-species homologues and developmental precursors of the inter-effector system. A battery of motor and action fMRI tasks documented concentric effector somatotopies, separated by the CON-linked inter-effector regions. The inter-effectors lacked movement specificity and co-activated during action planning (coordination of hands and feet) and axial body movement (such as of the abdomen or eyebrows). These results, together with previous studies demonstrating stimulation-evoked complex actions and connectivity to internal organs such as the adrenal medulla, suggest that M1 is punctuated by a system for whole-body action planning, the somato-cognitive action network (SCAN). In M1, two parallel systems intertwine, forming an integrate-isolate pattern: effector-specific regions (foot, hand and mouth) for isolating fine motor control and the SCAN for integrating goals, physiology and body movement.</p>},
	keywords = {Animals, Brain Mapping, Child, Cognition, Datasets as Topic, Foot, Hand, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Macaca, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Motor Cortex, Mouth},
	issn = {1476-4687},
	doi = {10.1038/s41586-023-05964-2},
	author = {Gordon, Evan M and Chauvin, Roselyne J and Van, Andrew N and Rajesh, Aishwarya and Nielsen, Ashley and Newbold, Dillan J and Lynch, Charles J and Seider, Nicole A and Krimmel, Samuel R and Scheidter, Kristen M and Monk, Julia and Miller, Ryland L and Metoki, Athanasia and Montez, David F and Zheng, Annie and Elbau, Immanuel and Madison, Thomas and Nishino, Tomoyuki and Myers, Michael J and Kaplan, Sydney and Badke D{\textquoteright}Andrea, Carolina and Demeter, Damion V and Feigelis, Matthew and Ramirez, Julian S B and Xu, Ting and Barch, Deanna M and Smyser, Christopher D and Rogers, Cynthia E and Zimmermann, Jan and Botteron, Kelly N and Pruett, John R and Willie, Jon T and Brunner, Peter and Shimony, Joshua S and Kay, Benjamin P and Marek, Scott and Norris, Scott A and Gratton, Caterina and Sylvester, Chad M and Power, Jonathan D and Liston, Conor and Greene, Deanna J and Roland, Jarod L and Petersen, Steven E and Raichle, Marcus E and Laumann, Timothy O and Fair, Damien A and Dosenbach, Nico U F}
}
