@article {2191, title = {Evolution of brain-computer interfaces: going beyond classic motor physiology.}, journal = {Neurosurg Focus}, volume = {27}, year = {2009}, month = {07/2009}, pages = {E4}, abstract = {

The notion that a computer can decode brain signals to infer the intentions of a human and then enact those intentions directly through a machine is becoming a realistic technical possibility. These types of devices are known as brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). The evolution of these neuroprosthetic technologies could have significant implications for patients with motor disabilities by enhancing their ability to interact and communicate with their environment. The cortical physiology most investigated and used for device control has been brain signals from the primary motor cortex. To date, this classic motor physiology has been an effective substrate for demonstrating the potential efficacy of BCI-based control. However, emerging research now stands to further enhance our understanding of the cortical physiology underpinning human intent and provide further signals for more complex brain-derived control. In this review, the authors report the current status of BCIs and detail the emerging research trends that stand to augment clinical applications in the future.

}, keywords = {Brain, Cerebral Cortex, Humans, Man-Machine Systems, Motor Cortex, Movement, Movement Disorders, Neuronal Plasticity, Prostheses and Implants, Research, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1092-0684}, doi = {10.3171/2009.4.FOCUS0979}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19569892}, author = {Leuthardt, E C and Gerwin Schalk and Roland, Jarod and Rouse, Adam and Moran, D} } @article {2189, title = {Advanced neurotechnologies for chronic neural interfaces: new horizons and clinical opportunities.}, journal = {J Neurosci}, volume = {28}, year = {2008}, month = {11/2008}, pages = {11830-8}, keywords = {Cerebral Cortex, Electrodes, Implanted, Electroencephalography, Electronics, Medical, Electrophysiology, Evoked Potentials, Movement Disorders, Neurons, Prostheses and Implants, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1529-2401}, doi = {10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3879-08.2008}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19005048?report=abstract}, author = {Kipke, Daryl R and Shain, William and Buzs{\'a}ki, Gy{\"o}rgy and Fetz, Eberhard E and Henderson, Jaimie M and Hetke, Jamille F and Gerwin Schalk} } @article {2185, title = {Non-invasive brain-computer interface system: towards its application as assistive technology.}, journal = {Brain Res Bull}, volume = {75}, year = {2008}, month = {04/2008}, pages = {796-803}, abstract = {

The quality of life of people suffering from severe motor disabilities can benefit from the use of current assistive technology capable of ameliorating communication, house-environment management and mobility, according to the user{\textquoteright}s residual motor abilities.\ Brain-computer interfaces\ (BCIs) are systems that can translate\ brain\ activity into signals that control external devices. Thus they can represent the only technology for severely paralyzed patients to increase or maintain their communication and control options. Here we report on a pilot study in which a system was implemented and validated to allow disabled persons to improve or recover their mobility (directly or by emulation) and communication within the surrounding environment. The system is based on a software controller that offers to the user a communication interface that is matched with the individual{\textquoteright}s residual motor abilities. Patients (n=14) with severe motor disabilities due to progressive neurodegenerative disorders were trained to use the system prototype under a rehabilitation program carried out in a house-like furnished space. All users utilized regular assistive control options (e.g., microswitches or head trackers). In addition, four subjects learned to operate the system by means of a non-invasive EEG-based BCI. This system was controlled by the subjects{\textquoteright} voluntary modulations of EEG sensorimotor rhythms recorded on the scalp; this skill was learnt even though the subjects have not had control over their limbs for a long time. We conclude that such a prototype system, which integrates several different assistive technologies including a BCI system, can potentially facilitate the translation from pre-clinical\ demonstrations to a\ clinical\ useful BCI.

}, keywords = {Activities of Daily Living, Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Child, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Motor, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Skills, Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne, Pilot Projects, Prostheses and Implants, Robotics, Self-Help Devices, Software, Spinal Muscular Atrophies of Childhood, User-Computer Interface, Volition}, issn = {0361-9230}, doi = {10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.01.007}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18394526}, author = {Cincotti, F and Mattia, Donatella and Aloise, Fabio and Bufalari, Simona and Gerwin Schalk and Oriolo, Giuseppe and Cherubini, Andrea and Marciani, Maria Grazia and Babiloni, Fabio} } @article {2178, title = {The emerging world of motor neuroprosthetics: a neurosurgical perspective.}, journal = {Neurosurgery}, volume = {59}, year = {2006}, month = {07/2006}, pages = {1-14; discussion 1-14}, abstract = {

A MOTOR NEUROPROSTHETIC device, or\ brain computer interface, is a machine that can take some type of signal from the\ brain\ and convert that information into overt device control such that it reflects the intentions of the user{\textquoteright}s\ brain. In essence, these constructs can decode the electrophysiological signals representing motor intent. With the parallel evolution of neuroscience, engineering, and rapid computing, the era of clinical neuroprosthetics is approaching as a practical reality for people with severe motor impairment. Patients with such diseases as spinal cord injury, stroke, limb loss, and neuromuscular disorders may benefit through the implantation of these\ brain computer interfaces\ that serve to augment their ability to communicate and interact with their environment. In the upcoming years, it will be important for the neurosurgeon to understand what a\ brain computer interface\ is, its fundamental principle of operation, and what the salient surgical issues are when considering implantation. We review the current state of the field of motor neuroprosthetics research, the early clinical applications, and the essential considerations from a neurosurgical perspective for the future.

}, keywords = {Brain, Humans, Man-Machine Systems, Movement, Neurosurgery, Prostheses and Implants, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1524-4040}, doi = {10.1227/01.NEU.0000221506.06947.AC}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16823294}, author = {Leuthardt, E C and Gerwin Schalk and Moran, D and Ojemann, J G} } @article {2169, title = {Patients with ALS can use sensorimotor rhythms to operate a brain-computer interface.}, journal = {Neurology}, volume = {64}, year = {2005}, month = {05/2005}, pages = {1775-7}, abstract = {

People with severe motor disabilities can maintain an acceptable quality of life if they can communicate.\ Brain-computer interfaces\ (BCIs), which do not depend on muscle control, can provide communication. Four people severely disabled by ALS learned to operate a BCI with EEG rhythms recorded over sensorimotor cortex. These results suggest that a sensorimotor rhythm-based\ BCI could help maintain quality of life for people with ALS.

}, keywords = {Aged, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Motor, Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory, Female, Humans, Imagination, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Cortex, Movement, Paralysis, Photic Stimulation, Prostheses and Implants, Somatosensory Cortex, Treatment Outcome, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1526-632X}, doi = {10.1212/01.WNL.0000158616.43002.6D}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15911809}, author = {K{\"u}bler, A. and Nijboer, F and Mellinger, J{\"u}rgen and Theresa M Vaughan and Pawelzik, H and Gerwin Schalk and Dennis J. McFarland and Niels Birbaumer and Jonathan Wolpaw} }