@article {3390,
	title = {Locomotor impact of beneficial or nonbeneficial H-reflex conditioning after spinal cord injury.},
	journal = {J Neurophysiol},
	volume = {111},
	year = {2014},
	month = {03/2014},
	pages = {1249-58},
	abstract = {When new motor learning changes neurons and synapses in the spinal cord, it may affect previously learned behaviors that depend on the same spinal neurons and synapses. To explore these effects, we used operant conditioning to strengthen or weaken the right soleus H-reflex pathway in rats in which a right spinal cord contusion had impaired locomotion. When up-conditioning increased the H-reflex, locomotion improved. Steps became longer, and step-cycle asymmetry (i.e., limping) disappeared. In contrast, when down-conditioning decreased the H-reflex, locomotion did not worsen. Steps did not become shorter, and asymmetry did not increase. Electromyographic and kinematic analyses explained how H-reflex increase improved locomotion and why H-reflex decrease did not further impair it. Although the impact of up-conditioning or down-conditioning on the H-reflex pathway was still present during locomotion, only up-conditioning affected the soleus locomotor burst. Additionally, compensatory plasticity apparently prevented the weaker H-reflex pathway caused by down-conditioning from weakening the locomotor burst and further impairing locomotion. The results support the hypothesis that the state of the spinal cord is a "negotiated equilibrium" that serves all the behaviors that depend on it. When new learning changes the spinal cord, old behaviors undergo concurrent relearning that preserves or improves their key features. Thus, if an old behavior has been impaired by trauma or disease, spinal reflex conditioning, by changing a specific pathway and triggering a new negotiation, may enable recovery beyond that achieved simply by practicing the old behavior. Spinal reflex conditioning protocols might complement other neurorehabilitation methods and enhance recovery.},
	keywords = {Animals, Conditioning, Operant, Female, H-Reflex, Learning, Locomotion, Male, Rats, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Spinal Cord Injuries},
	issn = {1522-1598},
	doi = {10.1152/jn.00756.2013},
	url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24371288},
	author = {Yi Chen and Lu Chen and Liu, Rongliang and Wang, Yu and Xiang Yang Chen and Jonathan Wolpaw}
}
@article {3090,
	title = {Operant conditioning of rat soleus H-reflex oppositely affects another H-reflex and changes locomotor kinematics.},
	journal = {The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience},
	volume = {31},
	year = {2011},
	month = {08/2011},
	pages = {11370{\textendash}11375},
	abstract = {H-reflex conditioning is a model for studying the plasticity associated with a new motor skill. We are exploring its effects on other reflexes and on locomotion. Rats were implanted with EMG electrodes in both solei (SOL(R) and SOL(L)) and right quadriceps (QD(R)), and stimulating cuffs on both posterior tibial (PT) nerves and right posterior femoral nerve. When SOL(R) EMG remained in a defined range, PT(R) stimulation just above M-response threshold elicited the SOL(R) H-reflex. Analogous procedures elicited the QD(R) and SOL(L) H-reflexes. After a control period, each rat was exposed for 50 d to a protocol that rewarded SOL(R) H-reflexes that were above (HRup rats) or below (HRdown rats) a criterion. HRup conditioning increased the SOL(R) H-reflex to 214 {\textpm} 37\% (mean {\textpm} SEM) of control (p = 0.02) and decreased the QD(R) H-reflex to 71 {\textpm} 26\% (p = 0.06). HRdown conditioning decreased the SOL(R) H-reflex to 69 {\textpm} 2\% (p < 0.001) and increased the QD(R) H-reflex to 121 {\textpm} 7\% (p = 0.02). These changes remained during locomotion. The SOL(L) H-reflex did not change. During the stance phase of locomotion, ankle plantarflexion increased in HRup rats and decreased in HRdown rats, hip extension did the opposite, and hip height did not change. The plasticity that changes the QD(R) H-reflex and locomotor kinematics may be inevitable (i.e., reactive) due to the ubiquity of activity-dependent CNS plasticity, and/or necessary (i.e., compensatory) to preserve other behaviors (e.g., locomotion) that would otherwise be disturbed by the change in the SOL(R) H-reflex pathway. The changes in joint angles, coupled with the preservation of hip height, suggest that compensatory plasticity did occur.},
	keywords = {Rats, Sprague-Dawley},
	issn = {1529-2401},
	doi = {10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1526-11.2011},
	url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21813696},
	author = {Yi Chen and Lu Chen and Wang, Yu and Jonathan Wolpaw and Xiang Yang Chen}
}
