@article {2202, title = {Rapid Communication with a "P300" Matrix Speller Using Electrocorticographic Signals (ECoG).}, journal = {Front Neurosci}, volume = {5}, year = {2011}, month = {02/2011}, pages = {5}, abstract = {

A\ brain-computer interface\ (BCI) can provide a non-muscular communication channel to severely disabled people. One particular realization of a\ BCI\ is the P300 matrix speller that was originally described by Farwell and Donchin (1988). This speller uses event-related potentials (ERPs) that include the P300 ERP. All previous online studies of the P300 matrix speller used scalp-recorded electroencephalography (EEG) and were limited in their communication performance to only a few characters per minute. In our study, we investigated the feasibility of using electrocorticographic (ECoG) signals for online operation of the matrix speller, and determined associated spelling rates. We used the matrix speller that is implemented in the BCI2000 system. This speller used ECoG signals that were recorded from frontal, parietal, and occipital areas in one subject. This subject spelled a total of 444 characters in online experiments. The results showed that the subject sustained a rate of 17\ characters/min (i.e., 69\ bits/min), and achieved a peak rate of 22\ characters/min (i.e., 113\ bits/min). Detailed analysis of the results suggests that ERPs over visual areas (i.e., visual evoked potentials) contribute significantly to the performance of the matrix speller\ BCI\ system. Our results also point to potential reasons for the apparent advantages in spelling performance of ECoG compared to EEG. Thus, with additional verification in more subjects, these results may further extend the communication options for people with serious neuromuscular disabilities.

}, keywords = {brain-computer interface, Electrocorticography, event-related potential, P300, speller}, issn = {1662-453X}, doi = {10.3389/fnins.2011.00005}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21369351}, author = {Peter Brunner and A L Ritaccio and Emrich, Joseph F and H Bischof and Gerwin Schalk} } @article {2200, title = {Does the {\textquoteright}P300{\textquoteright} speller depend on eye gaze?.}, journal = {J Neural Eng}, volume = {7}, year = {2010}, month = {10/2010}, pages = {056013}, abstract = {

Many people affected by debilitating neuromuscular disorders such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, brainstem stroke or spinal cord injury are impaired in their ability to, or are even unable to, communicate. A brain-computer interface (BCI) uses brain signals, rather than muscles, to re-establish communication with the outside world. One particular BCI approach is the so-called {\textquoteright}P300 matrix speller{\textquoteright} that was first described by Farwell and Donchin (1988 Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 70 510-23). It has been widely assumed that this method does not depend on the ability to focus on the desired character, because it was thought that it relies primarily on the P300-evoked potential and minimally, if at all, on other EEG features such as the visual-evoked potential (VEP). This issue is highly relevant for the clinical application of this BCI method, because eye movements may be impaired or lost in the relevant user population. This study investigated the extent to which the performance in a {\textquoteright}P300{\textquoteright} speller BCI depends on eye gaze. We evaluated the performance of 17 healthy subjects using a {\textquoteright}P300{\textquoteright} matrix speller under two conditions. Under one condition ({\textquoteright}letter{\textquoteright}), the subjects focused their eye gaze on the intended letter, while under the second condition ({\textquoteright}center{\textquoteright}), the subjects focused their eye gaze on a fixation cross that was located in the center of the matrix. The results show that the performance of the {\textquoteright}P300{\textquoteright} matrix speller in normal subjects depends in considerable measure on gaze direction. They thereby disprove a widespread assumption in BCI research, and suggest that this BCI might function more effectively for people who retain some eye-movement control. The applicability of these findings to people with severe neuromuscular disabilities (particularly in eye-movements) remains to be determined.

}, keywords = {Adult, Event-Related Potentials, P300, Eye Movements, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Neurological, Photic Stimulation, User-Computer Interface, Young Adult}, issn = {1741-2552}, doi = {10.1088/1741-2560/7/5/056013}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20858924}, author = {Peter Brunner and Joshi, S and S Briskin and Jonathan Wolpaw and H Bischof and Gerwin Schalk} } @article {2192, title = {A practical procedure for real-time functional mapping of eloquent cortex using electrocorticographic signals in humans.}, journal = {Epilepsy Behav}, volume = {15}, year = {2009}, month = {07/2009}, pages = {278-86}, abstract = {

Functional mapping of eloquent cortex is often necessary prior to invasive brain surgery, but current techniques that derive this mapping have important limitations. In this article, we demonstrate the first comprehensive evaluation of a rapid, robust, and practical mapping system that uses passive recordings of electrocorticographic signals. This mapping procedure is based on the BCI2000 and SIGFRIED technologies that we have been developing over the past several years. In our study, we evaluated 10 patients with epilepsy from four different institutions and compared the results of our procedure with the results derived using electrical cortical stimulation (ECS) mapping. The results show that our procedure derives a functional motor cortical map in only a few minutes. They also show a substantial concurrence with the results derived using ECS mapping. Specifically, compared with ECS maps, a next-neighbor evaluation showed no false negatives, and only 0.46 and 1.10\% false positives for hand and tongue maps, respectively. In summary, we demonstrate the first comprehensive evaluation of a practical and robust mapping procedure that could become a new tool for planning of invasive brain surgeries.

}, keywords = {Adult, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Implanted, Electroencephalography, Epilepsy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Young Adult}, issn = {1525-5069}, doi = {10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.04.001}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19366638}, author = {Peter Brunner and A L Ritaccio and Lynch, Timothy M and Emrich, Joseph F and Adam J Wilson and Williams, Justin C and Aarnoutse, Erik J and Ramsey, Nick F and Leuthardt, E C and H Bischof and Gerwin Schalk} } @article {2183, title = {Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs): Detection Instead of Classification.}, journal = {J Neurosci Methods}, volume = {167}, year = {2008}, month = {01/2008}, pages = {51-62}, abstract = {

Many studies over the past two decades have shown that people can use\ brain\ signals to convey their intent to a\ computer\ through\ brain-computer interfaces\ (BCIs). These devices operate by recording signals from the\ brain\ and translating these signals into device commands. They can be used by people who are severely paralyzed to communicate without any use of muscle activity. One of the major impediments in translating this novel technology into\ clinical\ applications is the current requirement for preliminary analyses to identify the\ brain\ signal features best suited for communication. This paper introduces and validates signal detection, which does not require such analysis procedures, as a new concept in BCI signal processing. This detection concept is realized with Gaussian mixture models (GMMs) that are used to model resting\ brain\ activity so that any change in\ relevantbrain\ signals can be detected. It is implemented in a package called SIGFRIED (SIGnal modeling For Real-time Identification and Event Detection). The results indicate that SIGFRIED produces results that are within the range of those achieved using a common analysis strategy that requires preliminary identification of signal features. They indicate that such laborious analysis procedures could be replaced by merely recording\ brain\ signals during rest. In summary, this paper demonstrates how SIGFRIED could be used to overcome one of the present impediments to translation of laboratory BCI demonstrations into clinically practical applications.

}, keywords = {Adult, Algorithms, Brain, Brain Mapping, Electrocardiography, Electroencephalography, Humans, Male, Man-Machine Systems, Normal Distribution, Online Systems, Signal Detection, Psychological, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Software Validation, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {0165-0270}, doi = {10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.08.010}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17920134}, author = {Gerwin Schalk and Peter Brunner and Lester A Gerhardt and H Bischof and Jonathan Wolpaw} }