@article {4494, title = {Workshops of the Eighth International Brain-Computer Interface Meeting: BCIs: The Next Frontier.}, journal = {Brain Comput Interfaces (Abingdon)}, volume = {9}, year = {2022}, month = {2022}, pages = {69-101}, abstract = {

The Eighth International Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) Meeting was held June 7-9th, 2021 in a virtual format. The conference continued the BCI Meeting series{\textquoteright} interactive nature with 21 workshops covering topics in BCI (also called brain-machine interface) research. As in the past, workshops covered the breadth of topics in BCI. Some workshops provided detailed examinations of specific methods, hardware, or processes. Others focused on specific BCI applications or user groups. Several workshops continued consensus building efforts designed to create BCI standards and increase the ease of comparisons between studies and the potential for meta-analysis and large multi-site clinical trials. Ethical and translational considerations were both the primary topic for some workshops or an important secondary consideration for others. The range of BCI applications continues to expand, with more workshops focusing on approaches that can extend beyond the needs of those with physical impairments. This paper summarizes each workshop, provides background information and references for further study, presents an overview of the discussion topics, and describes the conclusion, challenges, or initiatives that resulted from the interactions and discussion at the workshop.

}, issn = {2326-263X}, doi = {10.1080/2326263X.2021.2009654}, author = {Huggins, Jane E and Krusienski, Dean and Vansteensel, Mariska J and Valeriani, Davide and Thelen, Antonia and Stavisky, Sergey and Norton, James J S and Nijholt, Anton and M{\"u}ller-Putz, Gernot and Kosmyna, Nataliya and Korczowski, Louis and Kapeller, Christoph and Herff, Christian and Halder, Sebastian and Guger, Christoph and Grosse-Wentrup, Moritz and Gaunt, Robert and Dusang, Aliceson Nicole and Clisson, Pierre and Chavarriaga, Ricardo and Anderson, Charles W and Allison, Brendan Z and Aksenova, Tetiana and Aarnoutse, Erik} } @article {2134, title = {Causal influence of gamma oscillations on the sensorimotor rhythm.}, journal = {Neuroimage}, volume = {56}, year = {2011}, month = {05/2011}, pages = {837-42}, abstract = {

Gamma oscillations of the electromagnetic field of the\ brain\ are known to be involved in a variety of cognitive processes, and are believed to be fundamental for information processing within the\ brain. While gamma oscillations have been shown to be correlated with\ brain\ rhythms at different frequencies, to date no empirical evidence has been presented that supports a causal influence of gamma oscillations on other\ brain\ rhythms. In this work, we study the relation of gamma oscillations and the sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) in healthy human subjects using electroencephalography. We first demonstrate that modulation of the SMR, induced by motor imagery of either the left or right hand, is positively correlated with the power of frontal and occipital gamma oscillations, and negatively correlated with the power of centro-parietal gamma oscillations. We then demonstrate that the most simple causal structure, capable of explaining the observed correlation of gamma oscillations and the SMR, entails a causal influence of gamma oscillations on the SMR. This finding supports the fundamental role attributed to gamma oscillations for information processing within the\ brain, and is of particular importance for\ brain-computer interfaces\ (BCIs). As modulation of the SMR is typically used in BCIs to infer a subject{\textquoteright}s intention, our findings entail that gamma oscillations have a causal influence on a subject{\textquoteright}s capability to utilize a\ BCI\ for means of communication.

}, keywords = {Adult, Cerebral Cortex, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Imagination, Male, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1095-9572}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.265}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20451626}, author = {Grosse-Wentrup, Moritz and Sch{\"o}lkopf, B and Jeremy Jeremy Hill} } @article {2132, title = {Closing the sensorimotor loop: haptic feedback facilitates decoding of motor imagery.}, journal = {J Neural Eng}, volume = {8}, year = {2011}, month = {06/2011}, pages = {036005}, abstract = {

The combination of\ brain-computer interfaces\ (BCIs) with robot-assisted physical therapy constitutes a promising approach to neurorehabilitation of patients with severe hemiparetic syndromes caused by cerebrovascular\ brain\ damage (e.g. stroke) and other neurological conditions. In such a scenario, a key aspect is how to reestablish the disrupted sensorimotor feedback loop. However, to date it is an open question how artificially closing the sensorimotor feedback loop influences the decoding performance of a\ BCI. In this paper, we answer this issue by studying six healthy subjects and two stroke patients. We present empirical evidence that haptic feedback, provided by a seven degrees of freedom robotic arm, facilitates online decoding of arm movement intention. The results support the feasibility of future rehabilitative treatments based on the combination of robot-assisted physical therapy with BCIs.

}, keywords = {Brain, Evoked Potentials, Motor, Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory, Feedback, Physiological, Female, Humans, Imagination, Male, Movement, Robotics, Touch, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1741-2552}, doi = {10.1088/1741-2560/8/3/036005}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21474878}, author = {Gomez-Rodriguez, M and Peters, J and Jeremy Jeremy Hill and Sch{\"o}lkopf, B and Gharabaghi, A and Grosse-Wentrup, Moritz} }