@article {3091,
	title = {Should the parameters of a BCI translation algorithm be continually adapted?.},
	journal = {Journal of neuroscience methods},
	volume = {199},
	year = {2011},
	month = {07/2011},
	pages = {103{\textendash}107},
	abstract = {People with or without motor disabilities can learn to control sensorimotor rhythms (SMRs) recorded from the scalp to move a computer cursor in one or more dimensions or can use the P300 event-related potential as a control signal to make discrete selections. Data collected from individuals using an SMR-based or P300-based BCI were evaluated offline to estimate the impact on performance of continually adapting the parameters of the translation algorithm during BCI operation. The performance of the SMR-based BCI was enhanced by adaptive updating of the feature weights or adaptive normalization of the features. In contrast, P300 performance did not benefit from either of these procedures.},
	keywords = {adaptation, brain-computer interface, EEG},
	issn = {1872-678X},
	doi = {10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.04.037},
	url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21571004},
	author = {Dennis J. McFarland and Sarnacki, William A. and Jonathan Wolpaw}
}
