@article {3390,
	title = {Locomotor impact of beneficial or nonbeneficial H-reflex conditioning after spinal cord injury.},
	journal = {J Neurophysiol},
	volume = {111},
	year = {2014},
	month = {03/2014},
	pages = {1249-58},
	abstract = {When new motor learning changes neurons and synapses in the spinal cord, it may affect previously learned behaviors that depend on the same spinal neurons and synapses. To explore these effects, we used operant conditioning to strengthen or weaken the right soleus H-reflex pathway in rats in which a right spinal cord contusion had impaired locomotion. When up-conditioning increased the H-reflex, locomotion improved. Steps became longer, and step-cycle asymmetry (i.e., limping) disappeared. In contrast, when down-conditioning decreased the H-reflex, locomotion did not worsen. Steps did not become shorter, and asymmetry did not increase. Electromyographic and kinematic analyses explained how H-reflex increase improved locomotion and why H-reflex decrease did not further impair it. Although the impact of up-conditioning or down-conditioning on the H-reflex pathway was still present during locomotion, only up-conditioning affected the soleus locomotor burst. Additionally, compensatory plasticity apparently prevented the weaker H-reflex pathway caused by down-conditioning from weakening the locomotor burst and further impairing locomotion. The results support the hypothesis that the state of the spinal cord is a "negotiated equilibrium" that serves all the behaviors that depend on it. When new learning changes the spinal cord, old behaviors undergo concurrent relearning that preserves or improves their key features. Thus, if an old behavior has been impaired by trauma or disease, spinal reflex conditioning, by changing a specific pathway and triggering a new negotiation, may enable recovery beyond that achieved simply by practicing the old behavior. Spinal reflex conditioning protocols might complement other neurorehabilitation methods and enhance recovery.},
	keywords = {Animals, Conditioning, Operant, Female, H-Reflex, Learning, Locomotion, Male, Rats, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Spinal Cord Injuries},
	issn = {1522-1598},
	doi = {10.1152/jn.00756.2013},
	url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24371288},
	author = {Yi Chen and Lu Chen and Liu, Rongliang and Wang, Yu and Xiang Yang Chen and Jonathan Wolpaw}
}
@article {3383,
	title = {Persistent beneficial impact of H-reflex conditioning in spinal cord-injured rats.},
	journal = {J Neurophysiol},
	volume = {112},
	year = {2014},
	month = {11/2014},
	pages = {2374-81},
	abstract = {<p>Operant conditioning of a spinal cord reflex can improve locomotion in rats and humans with incomplete spinal cord injury. This study examined the persistence of its beneficial effects. In rats in which a right lateral column contusion injury had produced asymmetric locomotion, up-conditioning of the right soleus H-reflex eliminated the asymmetry while down-conditioning had no effect. After the 50-day conditioning period ended, the H-reflex was monitored for 100 [{\textpm}9 (SD)] (range 79-108) more days and locomotion was then reevaluated. After conditioning ended in up-conditioned rats, the H-reflex continued to increase, and locomotion continued to improve. In down-conditioned rats, the H-reflex decrease gradually disappeared after conditioning ended, and locomotion at the end of data collection remained as impaired as it had been before and immediately after down-conditioning. The persistence (and further progression) of H-reflex increase but not H-reflex decrease in these spinal cord-injured rats is consistent with the fact that up-conditioning improved their locomotion while down-conditioning did not. That is, even after up-conditioning ended, the up-conditioned H-reflex pathway remained adaptive because it improved locomotion. The persistence and further enhancement of the locomotor improvement indicates that spinal reflex conditioning protocols might supplement current therapies and enhance neurorehabilitation. They may be especially useful when significant spinal cord regeneration becomes possible and precise methods for retraining the regenerated spinal cord are needed.</p>},
	keywords = {H-reflex conditioning, Learning, Locomotion, Memory, Motor control, Rehabilitation, spinal cord injury, spinal cord plasticity},
	issn = {1522-1598},
	doi = {10.1152/jn.00422.2014},
	url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25143542},
	author = {Yi Chen and Lu Chen and Wang, Yu and Jonathan Wolpaw and Xiang Yang Chen}
}
@article {3188,
	title = {Effects of H-reflex up-conditioning on GABAergic terminals on rat soleus motoneurons.},
	journal = {The European journal of neuroscience},
	volume = {28},
	year = {2008},
	month = {08/2008},
	pages = {668{\textendash}674},
	abstract = {To explore the role of spinal cord plasticity in motor learning, we evaluated the effects of H-reflex operant conditioning on GABAergic input to rat spinal motoneurons. Previous work indicated that down-conditioning of soleus H-reflex increases GABAergic input to soleus motoneurons. This study explored the effect of H-reflex up-conditioning on GABAergic input. Of nine rats exposed to H-reflex up-conditioning, up-conditioning was successful (H-reflex increase >or= 20\%) in seven and failed (change < 20\%) in two. These rats and eight naive control (i.e. unconditioned) rats were injected with cholera toxin subunit B-conjugated Alexa fluor 488 into the soleus muscle to retrogradely label soleus motoneurons. Sections containing soleus motoneurons were processed for GAD(67) [one of the two principal forms of the GABA-synthesizing enzyme glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD)] with an ABC-peroxidase system. Two blinded independent raters counted and measured GABAergic terminals on these motoneurons. Unlike successful down-conditioning, which greatly increased the number of identifiable GABAergic terminals on the motoneurons, up-conditioning did not significantly change GABAergic terminal number. Successful up-conditioning did produce slight but statistically significant increases in GABAergic terminal diameter and soma coverage. These results are consistent with other data indicating that up- and down-conditioning are not mirror images of each other, but rather have different mechanisms. Although the marked changes in GABAergic terminals with down-conditioning probably contribute to H-reflex decrease, the modest changes in GABAergic terminals associated with up-conditioning may be compensatory or reactive plasticity, rather than the plasticity responsible for H-reflex increase. As a variety of spinal and supraspinal GABAergic neurons innervate motoneurons, the changes found with up-conditioning may be in terminals other than those affected in successful down-conditioning.},
	keywords = {activity-dependent plasticity, Learning, Memory, Motor control, Spinal Cord},
	issn = {1460-9568},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06370.x},
	url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18657184},
	author = {Pillai, Shreejith and Wang, Yu and Jonathan Wolpaw and Xiang Yang Chen}
}
